Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: HP Vs. Dollar, Bang for Buck...
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    brickman's Avatar
    brickman is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    west plains
    Car Year, Make, Model: '48 chev Stylemaster
    Posts
    1,390

    HP Vs. Dollar, Bang for Buck...

     



    We are having a great discussion in our car club about HP per dollar ratio and what is the most bang for the buck. I would love hearing what you all think would be the way to go, duel carb blower? Single or duel turbo's?(Ernie Banks style?) Nitrious? Big compression, Big cam? Stroker kits? Let me Know, I think around here it's a toss up between Blower and Nitrious. Spout off guys & Gals and let it fly, no feelings to get hurt here!!
    "Sunshine, a street rod and a winding beautiful Ozarks road is truely Bliss!"

  2. #2
    Itoldyouso's Avatar
    Itoldyouso is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    fort myers
    Car Year, Make, Model: '27 ford/'39 dodge/ '23 t
    Posts
    11,033

    Dollar for dollar, my bet goes on nitros.

    Don

  3. #3
    billlsbird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3 Window Coupe w/ 392 Hemi
    Posts
    916

    Quote Originally Posted by Itoldyouso
    Dollar for dollar, my bet goes on nitros.

    Don
    .....I'll also bet on the nitrous..... I mean, after all, how can one possibly beat hundreds of HP for hundreds of dollars???? Everything else is hundreds of dollars for dozens of HP or thousands of dollars for hundreds of HP....

  4. #4
    southerner's Avatar
    southerner is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Auckland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 Holden HT
    Posts
    818

    well I'll go for the blower, because over time you have to keep filling up the bottle and thet is an ongoing expense
    "aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"

    Enzo Ferrari

  5. #5
    gassersrule_196's Avatar
    gassersrule_196 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lawrence
    Posts
    3,261

    large bore small stroke and for add on's blowers or alcahol guy who uses it round here said its only 2.50 a gallon i was like :O i havent looked so i wouldnt know lol

  6. #6
    halftanked is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Liberty
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1929 ford
    Posts
    504

    I'd start with a 500 Caddy,can't beat cubic inches,and I can generally get good ones for less than a buck an inch, and giggle gas, let it blow if it wants. Hank

  7. #7
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    I like Halftanked's way of thinking! Stock cubes are the cheapest, and a 500 Cad is tops. Let 'er blow, they're cheap!

  8. #8
    canadianal's Avatar
    canadianal is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    waldeck
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 ford custom,27 t bucket
    Posts
    683

    he guys quit picking on the 500
    ill need another one of those when mine eventually goes to the great steel pile in the sky
    go get a olds 455 the bottom ends are pretty tough, i think they would handle the gas better

  9. #9
    thesals's Avatar
    thesals is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    san diego
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 mustangFB, 69 econline Drag Van
    Posts
    1,527

    i'd buy a cheap handgun, shoot my opponent and slowly cross the finish line... and it does have a lotta bang too
    just because your car is faster, doesn't mean i cant outdrive you... give me a curvy mountain road and i'll beat you any day

  10. #10
    chevydrivin is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    mccomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 belair: 68 Camaro: 69 F100: 51 M37's
    Posts
    287

    How about oxygen and acetlyne. Cut it up to make it lighter, don't spend any money on parts just cut old parts off.

  11. #11
    billlsbird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3 Window Coupe w/ 392 Hemi
    Posts
    916

    Quote Originally Posted by chevydrivin
    How about oxygen and acetlyne. Cut it up to make it lighter, don't spend any money on parts just cut old parts off.
    .....yeah I'd forgotten about this one. Just cut off everything that doesn't make it go faster! I once had an '84 Camero that weighted around 2700 lbs. I cut EVERYTHING off that didn't pertain to making it go faster. Even lexan windows, cut the ends off of long bolts, etcccccc..... It sure was faster cuz of this! zzz

  12. #12
    Don Shillady's Avatar
    Don Shillady is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Ashland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 29 fendered roadster
    Posts
    2,160

    Petersen Pub. Co. used to print a "Hot Rod Annual" which I tried to collect and somewhere around 1971 or so there was an extensive set of dyno runs by Iskederian Eng. on modifying the SBC 350. They got it up to over 480 H.P. without nitrous or any forced induction but in terms of (HP/$) the simple change of the stock cam for a mild Isky cam gave the most increase of about 63 HP for the price of a reground cam. For many years I was hooked on the idea that all you had to do was rebuild a 350 and change the cam. However, when you read the dyno charts carefully you can see that the low rpm torque drops off considerably when the cam is selected for more HP in the 4000 rpm range. That is why I now look at the low rpm torque since that will be the operating range when cruising in 4th gear OD. I just found the old article and the HP gain was 62.3 HP for the $55 Isky 280-H cam with a peak HP (I assume at the flywheel since their stock baseline was 293.7 HP at 4000 rpm.) With the only change being to the 280-H cam they got 356.0 HP at 5500 rpm. For comparison, the stock cam produced 170.8 HP at 2500 rpm but with the 280-H they got 158.7 HP at 2500 rpm. Using their old price that was (62.3 HP/$55)=1.13 HP/$. Probably a similar cam can be bought for even less today from Speedway, but of course that is the old way of measuring the HP at the flywheel and it is obvious that more HP at higher rpm degrades the low rpm HP. This is just playing with numbers but you said (HP/$). Overall I would agree with lt1s10 that adding a Roots-type blower would be the best way to add a lot of HP, but then what about overheating and crank bearings?

    Don Shillady
    Retired Scientist/teen rodder
    Last edited by Don Shillady; 08-08-2006 at 06:57 PM.

  13. #13
    kitz's Avatar
    kitz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Roadster, BBC
    Posts
    962

    Sorry fellas, IMO if all you want is the best bang for the $ then you cannot come close to nitrous. Period. And I am talking about total expended dollars and effort here, not just parts cost.

    That said, the fastest way to wrecking the average engine is nitrous also. But that was not the quest here ..............

    Kitz
    Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400

  14. #14
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    my vote goes to any forced induction, a couple grand for just about double the HP of what you had, continuesly, whenever you need it.
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  15. #15
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by brickman
    We are having a great discussion in our car club about HP per dollar ratio and what is the most bang for the buck. I would love hearing what you all think would be the way to go, duel carb blower? Single or duel turbo's?(Ernie Banks style?) Nitrious? Big compression, Big cam? Stroker kits? Let me Know, I think around here it's a toss up between Blower and Nitrious. Spout off guys & Gals and let it fly, no feelings to get hurt here!!
    N2O,by far is the cheapest investment.Over time a blower or a turbo becomes less expensive than N2O.

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink