supercharger vs turbocharger

[ebadal]

Hey man i say get rid of them both and put an NOS system on it cause you have power when you want it plus it is a tenth of the cost in the long run

[pro70z28]

Originally posted by ebadal
Hey man i say get rid of them both and put an NOS system on it cause you have power when you want it plus it is a tenth of the cost in the long run

LOOK Here.

http://www.clubhotrod.com/forums/sho...t=supercharger

[heheheha]

No good when you a) want power ALL the time, b) don't want to refill your bottles after every run, and c) don't want to replace things like rings on a monthly basis. I myself say turbo - no belt friction, and pretty lightweight.

[Swifster]

Originally posted by heheheha
No good when you a) want power ALL the time, b) don't want to refill your bottles after every run, and c) don't want to replace things like rings on a monthly basis. I myself say turbo - no belt friction, and pretty lightweight.

I like a blower because there's no lag. With a turbo you have wait for the turbo to spool up. A supercharger will give more low end torque, and the low end is what's used on the street. Notice GM and Ford have started using Eaton superchargers for a power adder. No turbo's in their lineups at all. What does that tell you.