Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 390 xtra HP
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Bfrazee is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Yankton
    Posts
    1

    390 xtra HP

     



    Looking for some more horse. I have a 390 with stock heads performer rpm intake holley 750 doulbe pumper, holley blue fuel pump. Headmen headers, rebuilt c6 w shiftkit. 389 gears. msd box and distributor. running about 13 degrees advance and all in 26 degrees advance at around 2800 rpm. Wanting to know what size jet to go to

  2. #2
    tyler's Avatar
    tyler is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    gainesville
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1973 porsche 914 283 v8 '65 Galaxie 406
    Posts
    335

    what kind of cam do you have
    Honda Motor= 1.6L
    Soda Bottle= 2L




  3. #3
    gentech is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    rancho cordova
    Car Year, Make, Model: 75' Ford Explorer F-150
    Posts
    6

    Too much carb

     



    Stock heads, no mention of cam lift and way too much carb. I would suggest going to the Eldelbrock site and looking at the Ford FE RPM package.

  4. #4
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Unless it is a serious drag car, a vacuum seconday carb seems to work a lot better then a mechanical linkage secondary. A 650 vacuum secondary would probably be about the right choice for power, driveability, and mpg...JMO
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  5. #5
    Henry Rifle's Avatar
    Henry Rifle is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Little Elm
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford Low Boy w/ZZ430 Clone
    Posts
    3,890

    I"m not an expert on carb sizing. I only know what I've run on various cars for the last 40 years or so. A 750 may be a bit large for a 390 with some decent power, but it's not out of the ballpark and I wouldn't throw it away (or sell it) to buy a smaller one. Tuned, it will work fine. I ran a 750 DP, manual secondaries on my GTO (400 CID). The original Quadrajet was 750 CFM, vacuum secondaries. I ran a 3310, 750 CFM, vacuum secondaires. I even tried a Holley 3-bbl, 950 CFM. Anyone remember them? The best performer with the best response was the 750DP. The best mileage/performance combination was the 3310, but the Q-jet was close. The 3-bbl was the biggest PITA to tune, but it ran as good as the 3310 once I got it there.

    Shoot, the original 302 Z-28 even ran an 850 CFM Holley clone.

    Just saying that I'd really work on tuning the 750DP before I spent a lot of extra cash on something else.
    Jack

    Gone to Texas

  6. #6
    Irelands child's Avatar
    Irelands child is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ballston Lake
    Car Year, Make, Model: Ford 5.0L '31 A Brookville Roadster
    Posts
    667

    Talking Holley carbs

     



    QUOTE=Henry Rifle]I"m not an expert on carb sizing. I only know what I've run on various cars for the last 40 years or so. A 750 may be a bit large for a 390 with some decent power,

    I tried an early 3310 (780 CFM) for a while on my long gone '79 F350 years ago, thinking bigger is always better. It ran like crap, especially in the Colorado mountains pulling my 30 foot 5th wheel. At sea level, ran OK, but the original Holley was about a 550CFM, if my recollection is good. The 3310 gave me about 11 mpg, the original about 12.5 empty. Got an idea and took the Edelbrock Performer 600 cfm off my street rod and put it on the truck. Performance vastly improved, and better yet, the gas mileage went to 13.5 all around driving. And I could smoke the 12" wide rear tires again. Mind you, this was on a mildly modified (cam, exhaust and dist) 460 CID, 6200+ pound F350 SCab.

    My experiences with a 950 3 bbl were interesting on my 390 '68 Torino. It ran like gangbusters for about 6 months, then just plain wore out. Shafts were sloppy, leaked everywhere, power valves blew out about once a month, etc, etc. Finally sold it for $65 - and regretted it ever since as it was a conversation piece worth more than that. I then ran a 406 Tri Power on the Torino for several years afterwards - and finally sold that setup a couple of years ago, long after the Torino was scrapped, probably to make steel for ricers
    Dave

  7. #7
    gentech is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    rancho cordova
    Car Year, Make, Model: 75' Ford Explorer F-150
    Posts
    6

    I thought I would post this link. It's a calculator for carb. sizing

    http://www.usaimports.co.uk/Carb_Calculator.htm

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink