Actually 1975 was the last year of official import and sale through Lincoln Mercury dealers, but you could still legally import them all the way through 1992.......
Bill S.
Printable View
Face it Matt, the cars post '72 sucked, and there's not enough lipstick to make those pigs presentable. The poor performance continued for about ten years.
I should have said, "....performance post '72 sucked...." as opposed to "...the cars." With the '73 models performance went into the toilet, and stayed there for year after year after year.... And if you weren't old enough to be driving in those years you have no idea how bad those mid-'70's years were for what Detroit still tried to sell as "muscle".
Imho.. if you think 1974/ 75 ANYTHING was a performance vehicle!!! You've obviously never had your pants scared off of you by a big block anything from the big three from 67 to 71, period!
I used to spin Clevelands until they broke the crankshafts, none of them could lift the front wheels of my Cougar at the track, my 67 Mustang fitted with a 428 could do it easily..
Just not the same performance imho! With those Big Blocks, Tromp down on the little pedal to the right and send the tires up in smoke, from a stock vehicle! At almost any speed..
Funny conversation, not laughing funny, more "interesting" to discover the perceptions of what some guys feel is performance when compared to others.
Robin, my statement applies to vehicles made in/for the US market after '72 when the Detroit engineer's heads were reeling from all of the new regulations that they had to deal with, and had very little experience how to comply on a large scale mass production basis. Those guys were throwing about a mile of vacuum tubing at everything with four wheels, along with that new monster, EGR, the artificial octane booster. What you guys had in other parts of the world may have still been what we had enjoyed pre-'72 for a few years but it's a moot point.