Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: a/c helping mpg??!!
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    burrbrian's Avatar
    burrbrian is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    springfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: "71" chevy 1/2 ton 2wd pickup
    Posts
    89

    a/c helping mpg??!!

     



    A local shop around here put out a brochure that claims that running the air and keeping the windows up will give you better milage than running around with the windows down! Going on the idea that with windows down it creates more drag than with them up and kills the areodynamics. Does anyone think that takes more out of it than using the a/c?
    personnaly, I am not buying it. I have seen the a/c take 3-5 mpg and don't think the windows being down would do more than that. Haven't really gotten that deeply hung-up on the subject but thought it would be something for us to scratch our heads about.

  2. #2
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Don't know. Saw it on Mythbusters once, they said the same thing. Probably especially true on newer cars that actually have some aero....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  3. #3
    Itoldyouso's Avatar
    Itoldyouso is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    fort myers
    Car Year, Make, Model: '27 ford/'39 dodge/ '23 t
    Posts
    11,033

    Run a test: One week fill up your tank and set your tripometer to zero and see how far you go on a tank of gas. Next fillup, do exactly same thing, but ride around with the windows open, no A/C.

    Let us know how you make out.


    Don

  4. #4
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    I've heard that story for thirty years or more, didn't believe it then and doubt it now. With the new, gutless little pointy-ended 'boxes they call automobiles these days, and tiny Chinese compressers, it might actually be true. Hope I never have to find out!

  5. #5
    lt1s10's Avatar
    lt1s10 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    rustburg,
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1997 CHEVY.S10 LT1-350
    Posts
    4,093

    Quote Originally Posted by burrbrian
    A local shop around here put out a brochure that claims that running the air and keeping the windows up will give you better milage than running around with the windows down! Going on the idea that with windows down it creates more drag than with them up and kills the areodynamics. Does anyone think that takes more out of it than using the a/c?
    personnaly, I am not buying it. I have seen the a/c take 3-5 mpg and don't think the windows being down would do more than that. Haven't really gotten that deeply hung-up on the subject but thought it would be something for us to scratch our heads about.
    newer cars i'd say its so.
    Mike
    check my home page out!!!
    http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html




  6. #6
    Stu Cool's Avatar
    Stu Cool is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Olivehurst, CA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '53 Studebaker Custom w/LS1
    Posts
    1,900

    Quote Originally Posted by lt1s10
    newer cars i'd say its so.
    I agree, the newer A/C systems are much more efficient. Even the newer trucks are designed with aerodynamics and are most efficient with the windows up.

    Pat
    Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong!

  7. #7
    astroracer's Avatar
    astroracer is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Byron, Mi.
    Car Year, Make, Model: '88 Astro Van-BAD AST
    Posts
    871

    I drive 120 miles a day to work and back. I drive either a '92 Astro Van or a 2000 Monte Carlo SS. I can definetly say I get better mileage with the windows up and the air on. My '95 GMC Sierra is the same way and so was my '89 Chevy pickup. You won't get any argument from me that there is a difference...
    Mark
    If money is the root of all evil... Women must be the fertilizer...
    Link to my BAD AST Build Thread:
    http://www.clubhotrod.com/suspension...van-build.html

  8. #8
    mopar34's Avatar
    mopar34 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Stewartstown
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ply PE sdn; 57 Olds 88 J2
    Posts
    1,953

    The newer a/c compressors don't drag on the engine as they did back in the 60's and 70's, they take away very little hp. If the car is relatively drag efficient, then a/c and windows up would be more fuel efficient that no a/c and windows down. Now as for old cars and cars using the compressors that take a toll on the engine or less aerodynamic vehicles, then the efficency would be less likely. This does not apply to street rods and kustoms though. If you truly want to be cool in one of these cars, you gotta open the windows and hang your elbow out while wearing your shades and a tee shirt.

    If you can't be Milner, at least you can pretend.

  9. #9
    NTFDAY's Avatar
    NTFDAY is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Springfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: '66 Mustang, 76 Corvette
    Posts
    5,394

    I agree with Denny. In stop and go traffic gas mileage will suffer, but as Denny said cruisin' down the interstate at 60 mph you'll get better mileage with the ac on and the windows rolled up. Pickup trucks with the tailgate up and no bed cover will also cut your mileage cruisin' down the interstate at 60 mph.
    Ken Thomas
    NoT FaDe AwaY and the music didn't die
    The simplest road is usually the last one sought
    Wild Willie & AA/FA's The greatest show in drag racing

  10. #10
    burrbrian's Avatar
    burrbrian is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    springfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: "71" chevy 1/2 ton 2wd pickup
    Posts
    89

    Hey, everybody. Seems like the general train of thought is that it will get better mileage but like mopar and pope say I prefer to hang my arm out and have the fresh air in my face! Never could stand being closed up with the car-or truck, in my case- shut up tight. Even run the window 1/3 way down in winter. NOT totally crazy, though. I still use heat. Thanks for everybodies thoughts on this, made for good exercise for my noodle. see ya!

  11. #11
    burrbrian's Avatar
    burrbrian is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    springfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: "71" chevy 1/2 ton 2wd pickup
    Posts
    89

    Okay, seems like in the newer cars it makes a slight difference in favor of mileage but I know in the older-early 70's,late 70's it hurt mileage. I guess a lot depends on the systems in the vehicle and how much drain they put on them. Oh, Don don't fret the hair- a lot of women like the " windblown" look.
    Oh, R Pope, I am crazy but have been trying to convince my new boss that I have an inkling of sanity left!
    Last edited by burrbrian; 07-21-2006 at 04:35 AM.

  12. #12
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    I'v never had the chance to test it. There are a few the Myth busters have had dead wrong like the American grafittie cop car, rear end pull out scene, the car they used was a 4 link and not a leaf spring suspension which is clearly evident that the american graffittie car was leaf spring. supprised they havn't had a revisit on it yet.
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink