Threaded View
-
09-20-2018 03:30 PM #1
Improved Geometry for GM Triangulated 4-bar susenpension
I have a GM triangulated 4-bar rear suspension from a 95 B-body that I plan to swap into my 1937 Buick (like the one in the picture).
Still considering a torque arm set-up, but also looking at keeping with triangulated 4-bar for simplicity and lower cost.
I already bought UMR Performance adjustable lower control arms with Roto-joints on the axle end.
I have read that it is best to have all arms the same length.
The standard upper control arms are much shorter, so I'm wondering if I should try to fit something longer for better ride, or performance.
Suggestions and guidance would be welcome.
Thanks
Saw this posted on FB, and thought of posting it on the Joke Page as a Model A Donk, but then thought it's not a joke, it's cool!! -
Montana Mail Runner