Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Price of a 402 BB
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    dowierj is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Saskatoon
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1967 Camaro
    Posts
    57

    Price of a 402 BB

     



    Engine is from a 72 chevy truck. Engine is now in a 67 Camaro, runs good, but i wanna build a 383 stroker. What kinda of price could i get from the basically stock 402 BB.

  2. #2
    dowierj is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Saskatoon
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1967 Camaro
    Posts
    57

    no, I wanna sell the 402 BB and buy a 350 with a stroker kit cuz its way cheaper to get my goal of about 425-450 hp. Thats why i wanna know the going price of a 402.

  3. #3
    riverhorse59's Avatar
    riverhorse59 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Matoaca
    Car Year, Make, Model: 64 Impala SS
    Posts
    355

    Around here a used stock 402 might bring 450 to 500 .In that range. Question, why not build the 402?I've been told all my life it seems,that a big block breathes much better than a small block.LT1S10 and I have a friend that has a 67 --396-375H.P. camaro that ran in the high 120s in the 10s. That car was never used as a street car and is setting in his garage today with only 1122 actual miles on it. You dont see many 383s turning those kind of numbers.Although I have pretty much been a small block chevy man all my life I have been tempted to go that route myself, I have read several comparrison articles over years and I cant remenber the small block coming out on top very often. If You just want a 383 , go for it.

  4. #4
    HotRod65's Avatar
    HotRod65 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Lebanon
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1965 Chevelle SS
    Posts
    13

    NO REPLACEMENT FOR DISPLACEMENT!! I think you will have more $$ in the small block to get the same performance. That is why the drag strip is full of BBC's.

  5. #5
    dr_bowtie's Avatar
    dr_bowtie is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Elkhart
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1957 chevy Belair
    Posts
    316

    i agree...

    Keep the 402 and throw a stroker crank kit in that if you want....Your hp goal will be easier to obtain the BB.

  6. #6
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    why would you take out 402 big block ?? the stock heads will out flow the small blocks even if you spend big $$ the stock big heads with not much work they will kill your small$$ headswith stock parts in them bore the 402 to 0.30 and try to get it to 9.1/5 or 10.get edelbrock rpm or air gap. do not cut heads out for big valves with the small bore it is a waist of money do a bowl job and a good 3 angel valve job and ss valves for the cam at 0.50 230 230 544 544 on 110 or a501 527 214 224on 110the bottm end on big blocks are ROCK solid you do not need to spend much here put mich 77 bearings in it run oil clearances at .002.5 rods & mains a good set of rod bolts arp a good oil pan with a tray and some good machine work this 402 will kick a mud hole in that 383 and will last longer

  7. #7
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    I agree with everyone who answered. Cut the block for zero deck and use a 0.035" to 0.045" thick head gasket.
    Last edited by techinspector1; 05-10-2005 at 06:54 PM.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  8. #8
    1JohnnyO is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Hagaman
    Car Year, Make, Model: 71 Chevelle SS, 67 Camaro
    Posts
    404

    Another vote here for the big block.....so much easier to make power with them, build on it....dont take it out. Small block parts in general might be cheaper, but for a stroker build up, you're going to spend a whole lot more to get what you want. John
    When your dreams turn to dust, Vacuum!

  9. #9
    dowierj is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Saskatoon
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1967 Camaro
    Posts
    57

    time for a update- decided to go with the big block- being built as we speak- rpm heads 454-oval port alum-rpm intake, holley fuel pump and 750 4 barrel- moroso oil pan-high flo oil pump-arp bolts all the way through the engine-can remeber the pistons but 10.1 compression and scat connecting rods, oh and forged crank with a crane cam, .280 duration if i recall.... msd 6a ignition box, heli core wires and msn pro billet distributer...should be around 500 hp.....now, my rear end and tranny are gonna blow up but my engine is solid.

  10. #10
    kcress's Avatar
    kcress is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Santa Cruz
    Posts
    193

    at-ah-boy!

  11. #11
    1JohnnyO is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Hagaman
    Car Year, Make, Model: 71 Chevelle SS, 67 Camaro
    Posts
    404

    Sounds like a great combo...you'll love it. Now start a little savings account and label it "rear tires"
    When your dreams turn to dust, Vacuum!

  12. #12
    HotRod65's Avatar
    HotRod65 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Lebanon
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1965 Chevelle SS
    Posts
    13

    Sweet!!!

  13. #13
    dowierj is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Saskatoon
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1967 Camaro
    Posts
    57

    agreed. Ill take it to the track once, and i sure hope I get told to put a rollbar in. cuz that means im under 12's
    Im hoping to run high 12's.

  14. #14
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    11.49 requires a bar, 11.50 does not.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink