Thread: 6-71 or 8-71?
-
07-30-2005 12:01 AM #1
6-71 or 8-71?
I am getting ready to make the jump and put a blower on my 454. I have done a great deal of research on selecting which would be best size (6-71 or 8-71) for my application but can't seem to find any definitive answers. The motor is already a torque monster (Edelbrock performer package) built for bottom-end power (idle to 5500) but 470 lb/ft just isn't enough! I understand the advantages of both, i.e.
the 6-71 makes more boost at a lower engine RPM but the 8-71 produces less heat for the same amount of boost (on the same size motor). Does anyone have any real-world experience they can share? Also, I plan on running dual Edelbrock Performer 750's (AFBs) any thoughts on these carbs as opposed to running Holleys? Thanks in advance!
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
07-30-2005 04:36 AM #2
I assume that you already have the compression at a blower friendly level & want to run pump gas. Detonation is going to be your biggest enemy with a blower & keeping the air charge as cool as possible will help avoid detonation. The 8-71 will make about the same boost 10% underdriven as the 6-71 will running straight up on a 454... so, less heat. Lots of folks like the Edelbrock carbs, but the Holley or Demon carbs are (IMO) are best suited for blowers. Other things that help keep the heat down would be aluminum heads, running straight water (no anti-freeze) BIG aluminum radiator & dual electric fans, high flow mechanical water pump, engine oil cooler & keeping the timing advance down. There are several other members here that have quite a bit of blower experience, perhaps they will have a few other suggestions.
-
07-30-2005 06:07 AM #3
If you stuff an 8-71 on there, you won't be able to use a stock location distributor...
Except for looks, why would you want an 8-71?
Sheesh, you hot rodder guys
Jeffhttp://community.webshots.com/user/deepnhock
-
07-30-2005 06:22 AM #4
Since you guys are on the subject of blowers, may be you can clear up something I have been curious about for years. Can someone tell me what the numbers mean? I know they were originally produced to use on GMC diesels. I've seen them range from 3-71 to 18-71. Obviously, the first number relates somehow to physical size, but how? Why do they all end with 71?Jim
Racing! - Because football, basketball, baseball, and golf require only ONE BALL!
-
07-30-2005 06:29 AM #5
GM diesels were rated by number of cylinders and cubic inches per cylinder, a 6-71 had 6 cylinders of 71 cubes each.
-
07-30-2005 11:02 AM #6
Originally posted by deepnhock
If you stuff an 8-71 on there, you won't be able to use a stock location distributor...
Except for looks, why would you want an 8-71?
Sheesh, you hot rodder guys
Jeff
-
07-30-2005 11:35 AM #7
6-71 vs 8-71
I've had both on my boat motors and can't say I could tell the difference with the same boost levels.
I'm not sure if the 8-71 will produce less heat than the 6-71 at the same boost level. It's the compression of the air that creates the temperature rise and the required horsepower drain from the crank, although there might be a few second order effects like windage and frictional losses involved. You'd probably need a dyno to see these slight differences though.
The Littlefield blower I'm running on my present boat came from a friend who replaced it with a brand new 8-71 from Summit. After $3500 and 2lbs more boost his boat ran the same speed.
If you're running oval port heads on your 454 the 6-71 will produce more flow than your heads can accomodate. You can end up building big boost numbers in the manifold plenum, but not making any additional power.
As stated the first number indicates the number of cylinders, the second the displacement of a single cylinder (and the engine series). Two stroke Detroit Diesels were offered in 53, 71, 92, and (I believe 121) Series. The 53 Series blowers were the basis for the small B&M blowers.
Regards, Mark
-
08-27-2005 12:26 AM #8
Gee some people are greedy!!!
Oh well I guess you can never have too much Horsepower.No Replacement for Displacement
-
09-27-2005 12:45 PM #9
would putting a 177 blower with a single 750cfm edelbrock carb on a 427 chevy be dumb or would a 671 be better i was thinking of hiding it under my 6 inch cowl hood
-
09-27-2005 03:34 PM #10
Originally posted by J. Robinson
Since you guys are on the subject of blowers, may be you can clear up something I have been curious about for years. Can someone tell me what the numbers mean? I know they were originally produced to use on GMC diesels. I've seen them range from 3-71 to 18-71. Obviously, the first number relates somehow to physical size, but how? Why do they all end with 71?
-
09-27-2005 05:17 PM #11
about the carb. i ended up runing the Edelbrocks, because on a hot day the gas in the holly would boil over from the blower heat and with the Edelbrocks i didnt have that problem. i ran holly, Edelbrocks and predators. the predators did better at the drag strip. i used the 6-71, didnt see no need for a 8-71 on the st. had more power than i needed anyway. what ever you do just keep it simple and you'll have more fun.Mike
check my home page out!!!
http://hometown.aol.com/kanhandco2/index.html
-
09-27-2005 07:26 PM #12
"But what about blowers like the 14-71?"
The 14-71 as used in Top Fuel and Funny Car is a purpose-built aftermarket design. Here are the spec limits:
Case length max. 22 1/4"
Case width max. 11 1/4"
Rotor length max. 19"
Rotor diameter max. 5.840" including fixed stripping
The case must be one piece with removeable front and rear bearing end plates. Rotor must be contained within one-piece case. Inlet/outlet cavity restricted to max. one inch, measuring from the face of the bearing plate to the back of the cavity.PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
09-27-2005 07:44 PM #13
Originally posted by J. Robinson
Since you guys are on the subject of blowers, may be you can clear up something I have been curious about for years. Can someone tell me what the numbers mean? I know they were originally produced to use on GMC diesels. I've seen them range from 3-71 to 18-71. Obviously, the first number relates somehow to physical size, but how? Why do they all end with 71?
53.. 2.3.4.V6.V8.V12..
71.. 2.3.4.4Twin.6.6Twin.6Quad.8V.12V.12VTwin.16V.16VTwin
92.. 6V.8V.12V.16V..
110.. 6.6Twin..
149.. 12V.16V..
add to those Turbo .. Turbo intercooled .. Turbo aftercooled .. Turbo intercooled aftercooled ..
those are documented but may be a few others not certain if there was a 171, and there were some V71 Twins and Quads.. inline had High and Low blocks..
there were also V53 and 671 alloy block versions
PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
09-27-2005 07:57 PM #14
Re: 6-71 or 8-71?
Originally posted by Bernesto
I am getting ready to make the jump and put a blower on my 454. I have done a great deal of research on selecting which would be best size (6-71 or 8-71) for my application but can't seem to find any definitive answers. The motor is already a torque monster (Edelbrock performer package) built for bottom-end power (idle to 5500) but 470 lb/ft just isn't enough! I understand the advantages of both, i.e.
the 6-71 makes more boost at a lower engine RPM but the 8-71 produces less heat for the same amount of boost (on the same size motor). Does anyone have any real-world experience they can share? Also, I plan on running dual Edelbrock Performer 750's (AFBs) any thoughts on these carbs as opposed to running Holleys? Thanks in advance!
http://streetmachinesoftablerock.com...topic.php?t=81PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
I wanted to complain about this NZ slang business, but I see it was resolved before it mattered. LOL..
the Official CHR joke page duel