Thread: Getting into the 12's

Tweet

What would it take to get a 69 Chevy Step Side into the 12's, thats where it started! I'm on a budget and a big block project seemed out of reach, but after some reasearch and parts scrounging I decided a 454 and a shot of NOS should do it. Pat, John and a couple others have all had some great input and I welcome more. I have made one mistake so far, and am in the process of correcting it (to little valve to piston clearance). I am still stuggling with the cam I choose!. Here is project 454. MarkIV 2-bolt .060 over, line honed O decked, 049 heads w/ 2.19 & 1.88 Manley Pro-Flo valves, pocket ported, opened throats and unshrouded chambers, shaped the short side radius and cleaned up the ports a little (did not polish intakes or get to crazy w/ the cutters), matched intakes, polished exhaust ports and chambers, 4 angle valve job etc. Stock rods polished and shot peened w/ wave lock bolts. Cast crank, Balanced rotating assembly, Speed Pro pistons and rings. Melling oil pump and Moroso steet stip pan. CC'd heads and calculated compression to be 9.4:1. Edlebrock RPM Air Gap and a Demon 850 w/ anular boosters to top it off. MDS distribtor and 6A box. 125-150 HP plate style NOS system and 2" headers w/ X pipe or crossover, 2 1/2" exhaust. Last the cam I picked was a Crane 226 236 duration @ .050, .534 .553 lift and 112 degree LSA (this wider separation seemed to be better suited to the NOS). The truck has a 12 Bolt w/ 3.73's and a locker. I will run MT 325/50 Drag radials and a Turbo 400 w/ 2800-3000 stall coverter. Will this truck run 12's?

it should

lol theres a guy here with a 68 stepside with a 327 running 12.80's

Depending how much weight you're pulling (~3500#?) you should easily be in the 12's without the NOS on pump gas. I would cho0se 3" exhaust with high-flowing mufflers, though.

Weight is definately an issue. With the big block under the hood and a driver in the seat I'm guessing close to 4,000#'s. I have not had it on a scale. I agree 3" exhaust would be best, but I've got a 2 1/2" S/S system with Borla Turbos and mandrell bent tubing under it now that I was going to reuse when it swap out the small block for the big block. How much HP do you think I'll give up w/ the 2 1/2" system. Thanks for your input!

Originally Posted by Step Side

Weight is definately an issue. With the big block under the hood and a driver in the seat I'm guessing close to 4,000#'s. I have not had it on a scale. I agree 3" exhaust would be best, but I've got a 2 1/2" S/S system with Borla Turbos and mandrell bent tubing under it now that I was going to reuse when it swap out the small block for the big block. How much HP do you think I'll give up w/ the 2 1/2" system. Thanks for your input!

if you're not gonna turn it but 6000 rpm's, i'd leave the 2 1/2 on there.

Yeap, Mike, I agree. There a whole lot of studies made on exhaust flow and velocity against engine pumping made in the late nineties and early 2000's that indicated many people are actually going with too large of exhaust and killing the intake signal, etc. I still buy that arguement.

Originally Posted by Oldf100fordman

Yeap, Mike, I agree. There a whole lot of studies made on exhaust flow and velocity against engine pumping made in the late nineties and early 2000's that indicated many people are actually going with too large of exhaust and killing the intake signal, etc. I still buy that arguement.

never have had a 3 " pipes on nothing, but i've never run hi rpm's either, except on my mod. round track, but i ran small headers on that for the bottom end.

that is a very good question i think a 2 1/2inch ex to 3 will not see to much hp if yours is a true mandrell bent. i would think a Xcross mandrell bent 3 1/2 would be the best and you may see some tq with the x cross and some hp. the mufflers have a lot to do with any ex so if you had a 3 with bad mufflers i think you would not see any thing maybe 20 hp on the 3 with good mufflers? but do not forget the headers . you need big headers 2 to 2 1/8 to. a big ex work the best with all the right parts matched .so i think you will be ok .try running it with ex un plug that will tell you

Stepside....you should have NO problem getting into the 12's with your combo....getting it to hook is going to be the key. I know of many guys with similar combo's running low 12's, even into the 11's, and no NOS either. It's pretty easy with a big block. Getting the power to the ground is not so easy. You'll have to mess with suspension, and use sticky tires...but otherwise it should be and easy goal. I have to disagree with the exhaust question though...I would not go with 2 1/2"....more cubes like to breathe, and the 3" will help with that. If you're looking for 1/4 mile times, you will want the larger system eventually. If you're strictly talking street and short blasts light to light, the smaller one is fine. Im sure there will be differing opinions. John

What problems were you having with p/v clearance? You should have no problems there with most cams for this combo, and certainly not with the Crane you mentioned. You cam choice will make a huge difference in this engine. John

will your 2 .1/2 stop you from the 12. 00 NO. will you go faster with bigger YES but what do you want drag truck or street driver ?the bigger EX gets very loud have done many ex and think going to 3 1/2 with a x cross would be the best for the track.butwill be louder on street so keep that in mind .the crane cam will not fit? with the lsa at 112 and the low @ .050 it should but i would not be surprised if it did not o deck block less.020 cut heads ?.020 less big valves ? no valve drop you will see this no intake side i have seen them hit @ .050 240 on 110lsa 510 lift .i can not see ripping your EX out for the 3inch but would do it for the 3 1/2 if you use the NOS a lot. like i said if you have small tube headers than i would first loose them

Thanks for all the input guys, this is good stuff. The truck is definately a street truck going to the track once in a while so I think I'll stick with the existing 2 1/2" exhaust for now. I used stainless steel tubing and fittings salvaged from a cheese plant (true mandrell bends with a long radius and polished inside and out) It was all hand fit and welded with a heliarc (no miss matched connections or weld burn through). The X-pipe was also hand made the system turned out nice and the Borla mufflers sound pretty good, don't know how much they flow though. As for the VP clearance issue. We cut .028 off the decks for 0 deck, about .015 off the heads to reduce the chamber volume to 123cc (the valve unshouding enlarged them from there origional 118cc). Also the new 2.19 intake valves sit much higher on the seats than the old ones. After I got it together and degreed the cam I put the heads on with light check springs on No. 1. I was bummed when I found I only had .048 VP clearance @ 7.5 ATDC. The pistons are Speed Pro #2465F and gaskets are aprox. .040. Do you guys think I am bettter off to put some slicks on a set of spare wheels, rather than run the drag radials? The curent suspension setup is drop spindles and coils front, Truck Arm rear suspension with drop coils and gas shocks all around. I did fab and install a fuel tank in the rear and plan on relocating the battery and NOS to the bed. If you guys think the cam is a poor choice I'll swap it , but I can't afford a roller at this time (this thing could be a real beast with one of those). Thanks again everyone, look forward to more ideas and input!

Yep, the milling of both parts is what's causing you some problems. Nothing much you can do about that except change around pistons and cam to match. Wow, 123cc's still?? That's a pretty big chamber. Im not extremely familiar with those pistons...I know they're a popular one to use, they are a medium size dome, aren't they? Which valve did you have that clearance on, intake or exhaust? And what were your clearances from .020 BTDC to .020 ATDC? You can gain some clearance by advancing or retarding the cam...depending on where you need it. But when you gain on one valve, you lose a little on the other. I know on my engine, Im almost 0 decked (.005), and heads have been milled about .040, so I have the same problem. I have plenty of intake valve clearance cause the pistons have large valve cutouts, but Im tight on the exhaust. I advanced the cam to gain more on the exhaust, and the cam I just ordered was custom ground to help with this same problem. You can work around it.

The intake is the problem, plenty of clearance on the exhaust. Everything I have read says minumum of .080 clearance on the intake side. I don't think I can change the cam timing enough to resolve the issue, so I am going to pull the the motor down and flycut the pistons (looked at some other options but I think this will be best in the long run, engine is still on stand and this should only lighten them a gram or two). I don't need to make a deep cut but I definately want a little room for a bigger cam in the future, if this one gets boring or I go with a roller down the road. I was also suprised the chambers ended up so big, but I unshroaded both the intake and exhaust valves (hope it pays off they look real good). I was shooting for 9.5:1 and .040 quench, we came very close and every chamber is between 122.5 and 123cc. Like you said the pistons have a medium size dome and come to find out this is a more common problem than I realized, but thinking about it I have changed a quite a few things. I checked VP starting 20 degrees BTDC to 20 degress ATDC, I don't have all the numbers but 7.5 ATDC was the tightest clearance. If you can think of a better cam choice let me know, but I think a tighter LSA will increase overlap and make my problem worse won't it? Thanks for the help John, let me know what you think.