Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 366T heads/intake
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 21 of 21
  1. #16
    chevy427tall is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Friesland
    Posts
    26

    so would it be better to go with a 4.500 stroke and 6.535 rod or am i going to have trouble fitting that in my 427T block, this will be the second engine i've rebuilt, the first was an international 345ci(stock rebuild), i want a 500+ci engine but if it's easier to build a 496 and the cost is less, i'll settle for that, what do you think?

  2. #17
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by chevy427tall
    so would it be better to go with a 4.500 stroke and 6.535 rod or am i going to have trouble fitting that in my 427T block, this will be the second engine i've rebuilt, the first was an international 345ci(stock rebuild), i want a 500+ci engine but if it's easier to build a 496 and the cost is less, i'll settle for that, what do you think?
    Go with the low deck 496.
    This way you won't have as many hedder issues.
    If you want a 10.20 block go after-market and build a 598/632.

  3. #18
    chevy427tall is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Friesland
    Posts
    26

    the motor is going in and 85 chevy truck with 4in suspension lift and 3in body lift i don't think i'll have problems with the hedders

  4. #19
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by chevy427tall
    so would it be better to go with a 4.500 stroke and 6.535 rod or am i going to have trouble fitting that in my 427T block, this will be the second engine i've rebuilt, the first was an international 345ci(stock rebuild), i want a 500+ci engine but if it's easier to build a 496 and the cost is less, i'll settle for that, what do you think?
    well i built one with a 4 1/2 stroke like i said srp pistons are shelf pistons i have built many 572-632 tall decks. dart and world . bow tie. donvan tall decks .going with a 4.600 bore is where it at . the big stroke cranks fit better in all of them but the bow ties mark 4. i can not tell you if you can put a 4 1/2 stroke crank in your block ? how good are you with a die grinder? go to much and you will have junk. i happen to have some talldeck world blocks then you would have a 572 -598 with a 4.500 crank
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 11-02-2006 at 05:55 PM.

  5. #20
    chevy427tall is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Friesland
    Posts
    26

    I mildy proted a set of mopar "j" heads, i got a little to happy with the grinder and ran in to one of the valve cover bolt holes, so i'd say i'm not the best with a grinder, i'd like to use the 4.375 crank and .060 over 510ci, i don't want to go much bigger, should i use the 6.385 rod with that insted of the 6.535 and maybe shave the deck, 10.20-2.1875-6.385-.025=1.6025 comp height

  6. #21
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    well that is not a shelf pistons. a 1.645 is.it will not work with out working off the top deck off the pistons on a mill. so you are running customs .you could use the 6.535 rods that is up to you
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 11-04-2006 at 03:29 PM.

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink