Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 454 marine engine questions
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 34
  1. #16
    AdamB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    reading
    Posts
    74

    I opted for changing heads on my 350 marine engine instead of stroking to a 383. I put on the Dart Iron Eagle heads and was impressed. I only got about 30 horses or so though...

    Should I stick with a good GM set of heads, or spend the money for after market cast iron. I need to stay cast iron...

    Quote Originally Posted by 76GMC1500
    You'll make more horsepower putting a better set of heads on there and raising the compression ratio than you will with a stroker crank. 400-425 hp is reasonable to ask for with a change of heads and cam. You'll get better fuel economy if you pick the right cam.

  2. #17
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamB
    I opted for changing heads on my 350 marine engine instead of stroking to a 383. I put on the Dart Iron Eagle heads and was impressed. I only got about 30 horses or so though...

    Should I stick with a good GM set of heads, or spend the money for after market cast iron. I need to stay cast iron...
    I would choose your heads after you figure out if you are going low deck or tall deck.
    In other words a tall deck would be larger and require more head.

  3. #18
    AdamB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    reading
    Posts
    74

    some day I'll crawl into the engine bay and take some pics LOL. I did look for the engine numbers but didn't see anything. Will look again in better light.

  4. #19
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    they did not use 454 tall decks in the low power mercs that i ever work on they did use 427tall decks and they did make hi hp tall decks but alot more CID a540 short deck would not use a smaller head than a 540 tall deck

  5. #20
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
    they did not use 454 tall decks in the low power mercs that i ever work on they did use 427tall decks and they did make hi hp tall decks but alot more CID a540 short deck would not use a smaller head than a 540 tall deck
    I was refering to a 489/496 low deck when I talked about a smaller head meaning if it is a tall deck I would assume he would go 530+ cubes.

  6. #21
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    I was refering to a 489/496 when I talked about a smaller head.
    well ok tell mehe as making what ? a tall deck or short ? i have not seen a 454 tall deck? what head to use it is top RPM with the prop he will run and build from there
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 11-28-2006 at 05:47 PM.

  7. #22
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
    well ok tell mehe as making what ? a tall deck or short ? i have not seen a 454 tall deck? what head to use it is top RPM with the prop he will run and build from there
    Pat,I don't know what he is trying to build.
    I have not seen a tall deck 454 but I have seen a tall deck 427.
    Pat,are you messing with me??

  8. #23
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    Pat,I don't know what he is trying to build.
    I have not seen a tall deck 454 but I have seen a tall deck 427.
    Pat,are you messing with me??
    maybe he did say 454 tall deck ? or am i having flash backsneed to lay down room is spining

  9. #24
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
    maybe he did say 454 tall deck ? or am i having flash backsneed to lay down room is spining
    Pat,does your stress seem to get worse when you are on the forum??

  10. #25
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    Pat,does your stress seem to get worse when you are on the forum??
    no i take good drugs i just did not time them right to kick in i hate it when my timing is off

  11. #26
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
    no i take good drugs i just did not time them right to kick in i hate it when my timing is off
    Ignition timing or cam timing???

  12. #27
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    Ignition timing or cam timing???
    must be valve timing intake valve yup that is it or just to much over lap

  13. #28
    76GMC1500 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,176

    There are no tall deck marine engines, the 330 hp 454 is the same engine found in the 70's-80's Chevy pickups.

  14. #29
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    yes i think i did say that

  15. #30
    AdamB is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    reading
    Posts
    74

    Okay, I must have heard or read wrong some where about the tall deck thing. I will make a point of uncovering the boat today (wednesday) and crawling in there to see if I can see some engine #'s. Like I said, this boat originally had a 502 in it, but the owner replaced it with whatever is in there now. It says 454 on the valve covers but......

    Sorry to all you guys if I caused the room to spin LOL.

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink