Thread: I need help
-
03-07-2007 07:30 PM #1
I need help
I've just sold my blown 496ci and i want to start building another engine but i dunno yet with which cubic inches should i go with?
Im confused between the 509ci and 540ci and what i wanna do is a street/ strip machine with a hyd. Roller Camshaft and a comp. ratio 10.5:1 or 11:1
and a 200 shot of NOS.i dunno which camshaft should i get and which engine Block
any suggestions?
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
03-07-2007 08:40 PM #2
a 555/565 would work good but you need good heads
-
03-08-2007 09:16 AM #3
Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
-
03-08-2007 02:43 PM #4
Originally Posted by camaro76_454Last edited by pat mccarthy; 03-08-2007 at 02:55 PM.
-
03-08-2007 08:33 PM #5
Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
what im looking for is a powerful engine that makes more than 650 horses without NOS and if the tall deck is the way to go i dont mind, i can get a 572ci from World Products coz im thinking of getting one of their blocks or anywhere else . So what u think?
-
03-08-2007 09:01 PM #6
the tall deck would get you cid and TQ low rpms but headers will have to be made if you are going to run this hard and may go past 6500 then go with a soild roller cam you can use a hyd roller cam but them lifters may not want to hang on to the caM LObes at HI RPMs ALL IT TAKES is one time and it will be trash it you are not going to put many miles on it then a soild roller is the way i would go . what do i think of world blocks? any block will hold the power you want to make i have had block s that took over 1000 hp bowties darts and worlds if prep is good they all will take it the dart and world have much more iron in them so they can take a big bore better and the bottom end has more beef so if you are going past 1000hp with a big bore 4.600than them are the ones you want if not then your do not need it they are very heavyLast edited by pat mccarthy; 03-08-2007 at 09:04 PM.
-
03-08-2007 09:14 PM #7
Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
Do u recommend any cams that will work well with it?
-
03-08-2007 09:19 PM #8
well the 565 like i said but and i could sit hear and bang away on the keyboad BUT there is a time when you will have to pay someone to build it for you or you will build it so they may like some thing i do not like on cams i like cams that do not kill spring and use many cams makers cams and one that is willing to make me a custom cam
-
03-08-2007 09:36 PM #9
nice informations pat and i appreciate ur time & ur replies
Thanks
-
03-09-2007 07:08 AM #10
Originally Posted by camaro76_454
If you are going to go low deck build a 565.
If you are going to run a 10.20 block build a 598.
The 632 will cost you some more money to build.
The biggest problem problem with the 598/632 is if you run a 24* head you will have to look at some good heads.
On the 598's in street car's we have run the Brodix BB-2 Xtra's that have been CNC'D with really good luck.
I would not run a hyd. roller cam in a 598 I would run a mech. roller.
The hyd. really become to mild in a big cube engine.
In a 565 with the 11. to 1 comp. ratio I would look at some of the largest hyd. cam's out there.
Keep in mind that the power bands are based on a 454 and not a 565.
I have used Crane part number 139661 in a 565.
The specs. are .632/.632 duration at .050 is 256/264 the cam is cut on a 114 l/s.
The heads are the 325 cc Dart's with some port work done to them.
The intake is a Victor with a 1 inch spacer and a flowed 1050 Dom.
This engine with a 250 shot of N20 works great.Last edited by erik erikson; 03-09-2007 at 07:21 AM.
-
03-09-2007 05:01 PM #11
Just my opinion, but i had a Hydraulic roller with nitrous, and i would never have another one. Go with a solid roller even a mild one. If you have good heads, you will need less camshaft. I am building a 468 with a solid roller, and it is a fairly nice roller with soft ramps, easy on valvetrain. My hydroller was all done by 6500 it was floating the valves, it is very hard to spring a hyd roller to run up high.9.65 @ 137 MPH 1.39 60' More left in the car.
-
03-09-2007 05:24 PM #12
Originally Posted by Grumpy 427
They will rpm higher depending on valve weight,retainer weight etc.
It has nothing to do with the valve springs it has to do with the hyd. roller lifter it's self.Last edited by erik erikson; 03-09-2007 at 05:33 PM.
-
03-09-2007 07:39 PM #13
well that is what i said with less words
-
03-10-2007 06:45 AM #14
Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
-
03-10-2007 08:20 AM #15
You can never have too much explaination lololol9.65 @ 137 MPH 1.39 60' More left in the car.
How much did Santa have to pay for his sleigh? Nothing! It's on the house! .
the Official CHR joke page duel