Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: squish clearances
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    BBMonte's Avatar
    BBMonte is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Buffalo
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1981 Monte Carlo BBC 396
    Posts
    155

    squish clearances

     



    how dus squish clearances affect compression and detonation?

  2. #2
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    The idea behind squish is that it causes a violent "squirt" of air/fuel mix as the piston squeezes up to the head at TDC. This should improve mixing, combustion, and cooling of potential hot spots, allowing higher CR's. The only problem I have with the theory comes from my experience with old Hemi's, they have no squish area at all, and can run on much worse gas than anything else I ever saw and never detonate. Just one more case of the real world defying theory, I guess.

  3. #3
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by R Pope
    The idea behind squish is that it causes a violent "squirt" of air/fuel mix as the piston squeezes up to the head at TDC. This should improve mixing, combustion, and cooling of potential hot spots, allowing higher CR's. The only problem I have with the theory comes from my experience with old Hemi's, they have no squish area at all, and can run on much worse gas than anything else I ever saw and never detonate. Just one more case of the real world defying theory, I guess.
    Probably because of the centrally located spark plug where all areas of the chamber were equidistant from the plug. That and a low surface to volume ratio which tended to eliminate cooler areas and lended itself to a complete burn. I'm just theorizing though.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  4. #4
    BBMonte's Avatar
    BBMonte is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Buffalo
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1981 Monte Carlo BBC 396
    Posts
    155

    Quote Originally Posted by techinspector1
    Probably because of the centrally located spark plug where all areas of the chamber were equidistant from the plug. That and a low surface to volume ratio which tended to eliminate cooler areas and lended itself to a complete burn. I'm just theorizing though.
    i was thinking the same thing after i ran the post so i am going to be runing 9.5:1 how much is to much and how mush is to little?

  5. #5
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by techinspector1
    Probably because of the centrally located spark plug where all areas of the chamber were equidistant from the plug. That and a low surface to volume ratio which tended to eliminate cooler areas and lended itself to a complete burn. I'm just theorizing though.
    Richard,it is no theory.
    What you said is 100% true I.M.O.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink