Thread: Camshaft advice (again...)
-
04-04-2007 06:16 PM #16
And I am gonna need torque to get my tank movin...
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
04-04-2007 06:20 PM #17
Your on the right track now!!!
Just make sure the cam has a intake valve closing point that puts your dynamic compression close to 8.5 .This is where my exspertise ends.........I have no idea about lifts and lobe seperation and which what does when where.......but I know only certain lifts and lobe seperations are going to fall into the selection of cams that will give you the proper dynamic compression.Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)
-
04-04-2007 08:08 PM #18
Using the calculator, I ain't ever gonna get it up to 8.5??? Even at 0 degrees it only calulates to 7.83... its depressing. I geuss I will deal with what I got now to get the car on the road and find another motor to build s-l-o-w-l-y
my specs used for the calculator:
heads 120cc
bore 4.25
stroke 4
rod length 6.135
stat comp ratio 7.83 (calculated)
dynamic comp 154.60psi (calculated)
I am now looking at a Comp Cam 268H, found a new one with lifters cheap on ebay.
268 advertised duration, 218 duration @.050, .485 lift, 110 lobe sep , no specs for intake valve closing point
Seems kind of close to what Nitro recommended (I think)Last edited by Gusaroo; 04-04-2007 at 08:25 PM.
-
04-04-2007 09:35 PM #19
It will still get your heart pumping!!!!!Those figures are just to get the maximum.you will still have plenty of power!!!Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)
-
04-08-2007 08:08 AM #20
I kinda like the specs on the cam, especially with the standard tranny, assuming that the first gear is in the 3.00 range? My only concern was the "truck" heads. Are they the peanut ports?? I am not sure how the cam would work with the smaller peanut ports. As far as the low comp ratio, try to keep the cam over lap way down by staying with a LSA in the 114-115 range. The specs on the 2162 cam look very similar to the stock chevy L-78/LS-6 cam, just in a hydraulic version. I don't think you have any problem moving that heavy weight along. Good luck!!
Rich
-
04-18-2007 09:43 AM #21
Originally Posted by Gusaroo
-
04-19-2007 06:41 PM #22
Try this l http://www.compcams.com/Community/Ar...?ID=1108284073
Its off of compcams website. I went with the xe268 in my 454. I love it. I have the 781 heads on it with about 10.25 compression. I have it in my mud drag pickup.
-
04-19-2007 07:38 PM #23
Saw, I think you'r eheading him in the right direction. Gus please redo the calculations. I think you're higher in comp ratios than you think. When I first suggestion for cam selection was considering what you stated you had. I think you have more setup than you think. Run a bit higher cam than stock. Remember, your rear gears and stock components won't take much until you beef them up. But they will tale a little more to get it moving without breaking. Comp cams 280-292 will be okay if you tune, fuel, and worry more about streetability.
-
04-19-2007 09:49 PM #24
Originally Posted by shawnlee28
As far as lift, the more the better within the confines of mechanical clearance. The things you have to check closely when getting into extreme lifts are:
1. piston to valve clearance. Ideally, 0.250". An absolute minimum would be 0.080" on the intake and 0.100" on the exhaust. Some builders say the absolute minimum is 0.100" on the intake and 0.120" on the exhaust. More is better. Less could be disastrous.
2. pushrod to head slot clearance. A miss is as good as a mile. Turn the motor through 720 degrees of rotation and observe closely.
3. rocker slot to rocker stud clearance. Use a piece of small diameter solder held between the slot and stud while turning the motor through 720 degrees of rotation. If the solder gets pinched, grind the rocker slot for clearance.
4. valve spring coil bind. At full lift, you must be able to slide a 0.010" feeler gauge between each and every coil. If insufficient clearance is observed, you may be able to remove some shims to correct the condition. If not, change to a different spring or different retainer.
5. retainer to valve guide boss interference. 0.0625" to 0.125" clearance at full lift. If insufficient, change to a different retainer or machine the top of the valve guide down slightly. This could be done at the same time as machining the guides for PC seals.
LSA, LDA. Lobe separation angle is the more commonly used term, but I grew up knowing it as lobe displacement angle. Either is correct. The short explanation is that a narrow angle (100 to 110) will give the motor more low end, building torque quickly and then laying down on the top. Manifold vacuum will be low. Idle will be choppy. A wide angle (111 to 118) will not make quite as much torque on the bottom, but more in the higher range. Manifold vacuum will be high. Idle will be smooth. Look at Compcams. They grind nearly all their cams on a 110 LDA, right in the middle of the range.Last edited by techinspector1; 04-19-2007 at 09:54 PM.
PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
04-19-2007 09:55 PM #25
Good job Tech. More info is always a plus for those who spend the time to be well informed.
-
04-20-2007 06:26 AM #26
Thx guys, I think this stirng has been one of the best ones for me. I went with the comp cams 268H, got it new for $100 (includinig lifters) on fleabay.
You guys really helped take the mystery out of cam selection. I will be bookmarking this one. Ill let you guys know how it goes when I get the car running.
-
04-20-2007 07:12 PM #27
Gus, I'm going to make a suggestion to you. If this were my car/motor and I was installing a 268 cam, I'd advance the cam by 6 to 8 degrees. The hotter cam (over the stock one) will retard the intake closing point, closing the intake valve later than the stock cam. This is going the wrong way with your very low static compression ratio. By advancing the cam on installation, you will close the intake earlier and capture more of the fuel/air mixture, giving a more favorable dynamic compression ratio.
This is never going to be a race motor as it sits and advancing the cam will give you more driveability in the low and midrange, where you need it for the street. You'll give up some on the top, but how often will the motor see time above 4,000 rpm's? Any cam you install will be a compromise in one area or another. The best you can do is try to get a little better performance in the range where the motor will be run most of the time.
If you're unsure of how to position the cam for advance, either ask here or PM me for a tutorial. I'll give you the straight scoop.
Use a degree bushing kit such as this and drill the pin hole in the cam sprocket to 13/32"....
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...0&autoview=skuLast edited by techinspector1; 04-20-2007 at 07:16 PM.
PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
04-20-2007 07:36 PM #28
I bought a comp cam timing chain that has crank sprockets with three keyways, which allow you to set cam timing at 4 degrees advanced. I may try this...
thx
-
04-20-2007 08:23 PM #29
the comp 268 as a good cam this cam is ground on 110 so i think you would be at 106 intake center line. power is saying 1500to 5500 so you could AV it 4 if you want would come in faster???? how much gear do you have in it ??? no gear then you may want to move it . but i had one 28 years ago in a 396 stock engine with headers and alum intake holley street dom and it run very good and made good low and mid power in at heavy car .i would try it strait up your 454 has CID working for you. so looking at the cam it is not to big but you do have low CR so you could move it that would be up to you. if you can get the cr up i think that could be done easy then i would not do any thing with the cam. this cam small so you could cut the heads down and run a steel shim head gasket with out any pistons to valve problems .i would run it thru a desktop dyno to see if moving it would do much and run it with more av and a bit more cr if you have this cam use it. if not find a marine cam that would be a 330 hp merc cam that cam would make 330 hp with all your parts with a good intake and headers 375 hp easyLast edited by pat mccarthy; 04-20-2007 at 08:27 PM.
-
04-20-2007 09:14 PM #30
Originally Posted by techinspector1
I wanted to complain about this NZ slang business, but I see it was resolved before it mattered. LOL..
the Official CHR joke page duel