Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Hot Street 396 build, dyno numbers?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 31
  1. #16
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    Does anybody else wanna try to desktop dyno this combo? It just doesn't seem right that the peak torque would happen at 2500 RPM. My cam doesn't even start making power until 2500.

    And with 514 torque at 2000rpm's? Does that sound funky to anybody else but me?
    Last edited by 69elko; 05-10-2007 at 07:23 PM.

  2. #17
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    no it dose not. but i could run it on the dyno and look at it

  3. #18
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    well i would not take much from this but your cam adv 4 with your cam at 6000 rpm =HP 476 and at4500 rpm= 476TQ or could be this 5500 rpm =488hp and 4000rpm=513 tq with some work hard to say pick a number you like
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 05-10-2007 at 08:17 PM.

  4. #19
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    Quote Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
    well i would not take much from this but your cam adv 4 with your cam at 6000 rpm =HP 476 and at4500 rpm= 476TQ or could be this 5500 rpm =488hp and 4000rpm=513 tq with some work hard to say pick a number you like
    What is the advance on the 488hp? What do you mean with some work?

  5. #20
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    both the cam was adv4 that your cam could be already? did you check the intake cent line? work would be the heads my dyno is very limted on heads and other things that may help or hurt . what you need is to really dyno this and tune it in .or just shot low say 450 hp or spend money on the dyno time

  6. #21
    kitz's Avatar
    kitz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Roadster, BBC
    Posts
    962

    Sorry, I redid this at home and got the following;

    505 hp t 5500 rpm, 526 lb-ft at 4600 rpm ...........

    I think the previous cam timing wsa seat to seat and not 0.050. Those heads are holding your motor back ...............

    Kitz
    Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400

  7. #22
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    Thats closer to what I thought ,based strictly on airflow from the heads......
    That should put him very close to 480hp he wanted untuned.........
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

  8. #23
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    Quote Originally Posted by kitz
    Sorry, I redid this at home and got the following;

    505 hp t 5500 rpm, 526 lb-ft at 4600 rpm ...........

    I think the previous cam timing wsa seat to seat and not 0.050. Those heads are holding your motor back ...............

    Kitz
    That looks good to me. Thanks for doing that again Kitz. Think that will put a '69 El Camino into the 11's with decent traction? I'm with Pat, I think I will be happy with 450HP, maybe with a dyno tune I can get more. This kinda horsepower won't just fall in my lap, it's nice to know it might be possible though.

  9. #24
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    Quote Originally Posted by pat mccarthy
    both the cam was adv4 that your cam could be already? did you check the intake cent line? work would be the heads my dyno is very limted on heads and other things that may help or hurt . what you need is to really dyno this and tune it in .or just shot low say 450 hp or spend money on the dyno time
    And I did degree the cam, it came out at 105.25, it's supposed to be at 105. When I put the cam in I wasn't aware of how much a chain would stretch. So does that mean the engine is going to be a couple degrees retarded? And how much horsepower could that hurt?

  10. #25
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Most cam companies grind in 5* of advance when they grind the cam to compensate for chain stretch. Subtract intake lobe centerline from lobe separation angle to determine the amount of ground-in advance. As the chain stretches, the cam will be more and more retarded. The bottom end will lose a little snap, but the top will pick up a little and power will be broader through the range, a little less peaky at the midrange.

    I went back and found this post from an earlier thread...

    Advancing or retarding the cam moves the engine's torque band around the rpm scale by moving the valve events further ahead of or further behind the movement of the piston.

    Advancing the cam clockwise in relation to the crankshaft improves low-end power and response.
    Begins and ends all valve opening and closing events sooner in relation to piston position.
    The engine builds torque quickly, then lays down on the top end. Makes the motor "peaky".
    Decreases piston to intake valve clearance.
    Increases piston to exhaust valve clearance.

    Retarding the cam counter-clockwise in relation to the crankshaft improves high-end power, but probably not as much as you lose on the bottom.
    Delays all valve opening and closing events in relation to piston position.
    Increases piston to intake valve clearance.
    Decreases piston to exhaust valve clearance.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  11. #26
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    like the tech added moveing the cam 2-or+ you will not see i add 4 +adv to be what i was thinking that the cam had in it from isky..... they do this to help low end ... cam had on my dyno you have to put all the @ 050 in and so would the adv too

  12. #27
    kitz's Avatar
    kitz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Roadster, BBC
    Posts
    962

    Something still just doesn't feel right here.

    Oh yeah, you're welcome 69elko ...................

    Kitz
    Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400

  13. #28
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    My cam has no advance ground into it. Says right on the cam card. The intake centerline is 105. When I degreed my cam it came out at 105.25, so I left it alone. Do you guys think I should advance the cam some?

  14. #29
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by 69elko
    My cam has no advance ground into it. Says right on the cam card. The intake centerline is 105. When I degreed my cam it came out at 105.25, so I left it alone. Do you guys think I should advance the cam some?
    just run it were it is .it is on a tight lsa but moving it would give you some more low end power ? with them small port heads it may work good do you have the room on the intake side to move it 4+?

  15. #30
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    I'll have to check the clearance after I advance it. I'm not sure. I'll run it the way it is, and then when I feel like I need more power I'll fiddle around with the cam timing.

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink