Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 555ci bore vs stroke
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 17 of 17
  1. #16
    vettestr is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Glendale
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 Cobray-C3
    Posts
    64

    Building new stroke and bore combinations is a very specific science that that determine reliability and the personality of the engines performance. Many of the desktop engine dynos will alert you of potential problems with the pure mathmatics of a combination but they will not alert you of the mechanical problems you may run into.
    The mathmatics side of bore & stroke combos are issues like improper rod to crank depature angles or thrust ratios that just will not live very long. These ratios modify the side load - dwell - and thrust angle while defining the HP / torque curves. The mechanical problems like a piston skirt hitting the camshaft or rod cap clearance to pan rail is only available in much more expensive software. This is still much cheaper than ordering custom parts to find they simply do not fit in the case with the clearances needed not to mention if they should work together in this combination or not.
    Stay with packages or shelf stocked combinations so you know if the block can be messaged enough to keep you out of the water passages and if small enough base circle cams are even available. Let somebody (like the aftermarket manufacturers) with tons of dyno time and money complete the R & D to prove the benifits of a bunch of parts bolted together or if they will all bolt together.
    I have a 540 inch Shafiroff comp elim. engine just sitting in the shop waiting for me to build something to put it in I will probably never get too. I had her in a 2200 pound Cobra but just got tired of having to trailer to all the car shows. I could not carry enough fuel to get there much less get home on the 17 gallon cell capacity I have. It is 12.4 C/R so needs 110 octane min. to run on gas. Alky cut my usable milage in half so a trailer queen. These guys own the market for turn-key combiations or rotating assemblies IMHO but are always trying new things in the dyno room but it is hard to beat the tried and true numbers now being delivered.
    Jeff C.
    Manufacturer of the Cobray-C3
    www.cobrasnvettes.com

  2. #17
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    i have had 548/572 that see 7500+ all the time. the rod to cam is not a big deal less you run alum rods with steel rods you can run up to 4.750 with std base cam. but every thing needs to be check this is done all the time the 4.250 crank with a 6.375 rod i have built over 20+ of them from 486-565 they all work just fine the desk top will not tell you were or how much you need to cut out in the block alot of the time with the right rods there is a small bit of work the bmf heads i have beryllium seats and are cut for T@D or jesel not the sportman crap
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 06-02-2007 at 09:48 PM.

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink