Thread: Which rocker arms?
-
04-29-2008 05:08 PM #16
if your valve train is light then you do not need as much spring and can go faster with less spring less chance of pushrod flex stud flex and every thing else flex. but when in doubt in run abit more spring in the sand drag engines i see things hit that never shouldIrish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
04-29-2008 05:23 PM #17
there is some things wrong i think with the big block heads as to how the rocker studs (stud rocker arms) are not at the same angle is the valve guilde you would think this would be the way you would want it ?? i have spent hours checking things at mid lift and working with the contact foot print i have a hard time with the rocker is on one side of the stem valve now it is over here now it should be right there ?? wellLast edited by pat mccarthy; 04-29-2008 at 05:42 PM.
Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip
-
04-29-2008 05:26 PM #18
I'm just running the stock springs on these heads:
Trickflow PowerOval
Another guy running a 8.9xs Chevy II with the motor built out of the same shop is running .8xx lift in a ~650ci all aluminum big block that spins to 8000+ with 450# on his springs (but that's a whole different ball game )
I know you know your stuff, Jerry, I'm just trying to reconcile the differences... I think most of the bracket racers (did I detect a tone of disdain there? ) with roller cams are up here in the same ball park with the springs. BTW I'm not on the throttle stop (and won't run in the classes that are) and still footbraking (to a 1.670 60' last time out hope I can get closer to 1.60 but we'll see).
I'm guilty of putting way too many street miles on what really is more of a race motor and I should expect to break stuff when I do that
Thanks,
-Chris
-
04-29-2008 05:37 PM #19
well i do not know one damn thing i run the isky 1.625 240 @2000and 685 @1.250 part #9685 i run them in both street cars for over six years but have SS valves and heavy roller lifters with no rev kit i do not think this is to much but it is alot. could less work? maybe but it works to 7500 rpm this i knowIrish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip
-
04-29-2008 05:40 PM #20
... forgot to mention I also am running a rev kit... apparently I don't need it but does it make a difference in all this?
-Chris
-
04-29-2008 05:46 PM #21
oh you will just wear out your roller lifters faster you may want to look at them sounds like yours could be on the way outIrish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip
-
04-29-2008 05:48 PM #22
I like my throttle stop!!!! Best way I know of to keep the thing at 9.90!!!!Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
04-29-2008 07:00 PM #23
Originally Posted by jerry clayton
In or USMTS engine that see's 8,200 lap after lap we run Isky Tool Room Gold Strip springs.
Part number 9935.Seat pressure is 245 lbs. and open pressure is 590 lbs.
We run a Jessel system and we have had no broken rockers,pulled studs,extruded keepers/retainers,bent pushrods,busted lifters etc.
In one race on a 1/2 mile track we have five hot laps,ten laps in the main,twenty laps in the feature.
In two nights of racing we will put on more time than an averge bracket racer does in half a season of bracket racing.
At around twenty nights we are putting in new springs.
-
04-30-2008 07:18 AM #24
No distain for bracket racers--just that those engines don't need as much to race---I think that most are buying way more engine than they need to run the brackets they do.
I ran probably one of the very first Jesel setups for BBC--rocker system and belt drive--Spring part numbers I don't remember but we used Isky's that Van Luven had stashed in the rafters when he worked there---
Did not use a rev kit!!!!
With racers running so much seat pressure---lots of them are getting into coil bind and this breaks parts big time---first a stud or rocker, then bend a valve, hang open and smack piston and then the biggie---all because of trying to run a high seat pressure with components that didn't match
I'm not saying this as slam toward anyone, but many times I've seen results of very sorry parts choices--and other times we get info on things like spring pressure, bearing and wall clearance, cc, etc that aren't even remotely close to actual engine specs and they wonder what went wrong.
Erik---I also have thousands of springs off late models and stock block Indy car engines---probably keep them because they cost so much I can't just throw them away--wish they were gold!!!!
-
04-30-2008 05:00 PM #25
Originally Posted by jerry claytonIrish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip
-
04-30-2008 06:27 PM #26
Originally Posted by jerry clayton
There is very little difference in a Late Model engine and a USMTS engine.
If racers are "getting into coil-bind" it is plain to me they have a spring that is to weak for their application.
-
05-03-2008 11:53 AM #27
Thanks everyone for your insights... I'll talk this all over with my engine builder and keep a close eye on everything in the meantime... double check lash every week and examine all the parts...
Here's a video of what happened:
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/F...ter_159857.htm
-Chris
I wanted to complain about this NZ slang business, but I see it was resolved before it mattered. LOL..
the Official CHR joke page duel