Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 454 head question
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    docjim is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    upper state
    Posts
    2

    454 head question

     



    Hi,
    I am building a 56 chevy with a 454. I was going to build the engine to the Edelbrock total performance performer RPM package. They say this will produce 540 HP. I then decided that this is more than I want for a street only engine. My quesiton is, I have the original heads with casting number 336781 on them and they are the oval port heads with the 2.06 valves. Will thes work and lower the horsepower a bit over the edelbrock aluminum heads they suggest? How much horsepower can I expect and what should I do to the heads to make them work if I decide to go with them? Thank you for the information in advance. Docjim

  2. #2
    stepside454's Avatar
    stepside454 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Festus
    Car Year, Make, Model: 75 GMC C-15
    Posts
    342

    781s are great heads, would be really nice if you put 2.19/1.88s in em. youll be down some horsepower, Im gonna guess 30-40 HP compared to the RPM headsat the most, but chances are that loss will only be in the upper rpm range anyway. John
    75 GMC C-15 factory 454, automatic, lowered

  3. #3
    327,JET's Avatar
    327,JET is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    milton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 76 Nova
    Posts
    229

    Those oval port head's will work very well with your motor , they produce a lot of low end torque . If you can afford it though the Edelbrock's are awesome plus your putting your Big -Block on a big weight loss program. Less weight is a big factor with me!

  4. #4
    1JohnnyO is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Hagaman
    Car Year, Make, Model: 71 Chevelle SS, 67 Camaro
    Posts
    404

    Docjim, the 781's are great heads, even as they are with that valve size. If you're not going to race it, you wont notice or feel any difference between those valves and 2.19/1.88's or larger. And in the same vein, if you're not racing, the weight loss will not make a difference...but you'll save a lot of money!! (Aluminum is nice, but pricey) The only concern with those heads is the rather large combustion chamber, unless you use a domed piston, your C/R is going to be low....with the stock pistons, it was way down, less than 8.0/1. A big dome piston with stock chamber sizes might get you up around 9.25 to one, not bad. I dont know what you're looking for. John
    When your dreams turn to dust, Vacuum!

  5. #5
    BOBCRMAN@aol.'s Avatar
    BOBCRMAN@aol. is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Holly, Mi.
    Car Year, Make, Model: various 1924-91
    Posts
    223

    Keith Black lists a piston just for that combo. Not a big dome and gets the compression back up to reasonable street use. Available with either std 5/64 rings or the 1/16 rings. KB257 is the std ring set no.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink