Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Lower compression 12.5:1-10.5:1 HELP!
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    THEFED is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Akron
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1981 Camaro
    Posts
    28

    Lower compression 12.5:1-10.5:1 HELP!

     



    I have an interesting question. I've considered buying a 383 from a close friend of mine. It's pushing a 71 MONTE CARLO to 11.7 second ETS. He guesses 510 HP.

    Regardless, he's running steel PRO ACTION heads, and a cam that's rouhly 250/26o @.050,.533/.553 lift. This is at 12:5-1 Compression.

    What HP gain/loss would one expect from dropping compression to 9.5:1 or 10.5:1 or for pump gas, while replacing those heads with AFR 195's. ..keeping all else the same.

    Any input would be super. Should I get it, swap cams, or what? He wants 1500 for the short block with cams and lifters . I know for a fact he spent about 2000 on machine work taking it to a 383, and has had 125 passes on it since. It's a clean, strong motor.

    PS - That cam seems a little beefy for a 75/25 street/strip motor. I guess I could expect shi**y vaccum. he ran a vacuum reserve to help with that. anything else not advantageous about a cam like this?
    Last edited by THEFED; 02-15-2005 at 07:55 PM.

  2. #2
    383 chev's Avatar
    383 chev is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    MI
    Car Year, Make, Model: 93 tbird sc, daily atm
    Posts
    299

    with 195 heads you will never miss the horse power loss with the torque u will gain. as for the compression part IDK. If u go with less compresion u may want to go with the smaller cam JMO

  3. #3
    dr_bowtie's Avatar
    dr_bowtie is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Elkhart
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1957 chevy Belair
    Posts
    316

    My friend has a 383 running the aluminum head (195's) and a cam that is roughly 230-235 dur@.050 with just close to .500 inch lift and 9.5 to 1 compression and he has run a best of 11.70's in the 1/4'r 10.50's on juice in a 88 trans am with 355 rear gears...

    So I'd say you'd be okay.....plus his idles well and is very streetable!

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink