Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: hosrepower 305
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
Results 46 to 59 of 59
  1. #46
    dangeroustoy's Avatar
    dangeroustoy is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    NW Arkansas
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Ford Hi Boy Roadster
    Posts
    677

    LOL...

     



    Looks like the "Rat Rod" thread has the most ever posts!!! I think I might post on it again to insure it's place in CHR history...

    Dave Brisco

  2. #47
    CanAmThunder is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    5

    I run a Lola Can Am and we are limited to 5000 cc(305 c.i.) (Formula 5000 based) 610 hp at 8200 rpm, Lucas timed injection.

  3. #48
    CanAmThunder is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    5

    This is an overgeneralization, but the smaller stroke the higher we can make it rev, all mods being equal. The higher we can rev it, the less we have to shift. One saved shift is really two because if we don't have to shift from 3rd to 4th coming out of turn five, then we don't have to shift bact o\to 3rd going into turn six. These are road race concerns, not Hot Rod concerns, my only point is that a 305 can grow some balls if it needs to, and out rev a 350 similarly equipped, and by that I mean last longer at the same rev limit. I took out the 327 that had been bored and stroked to a 388 in order to be legal, but have run better lap times due to the higher rev limit. Either motor is only good for 25 hours in a Can Am car and then needs to be freshened up, so longevity is a relative aspect for sure.
    regards,
    Johan

  4. #49
    LanceX is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    seguin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 82 chevy silverado
    Posts
    18

    Hey Bob Parmenter, you oughta look at the "top Ten" again! i am in tenth place for most replied thread!!!! thats cool
    Well screamer, streets and all who know what i am talking about, i found out that my dad has plans for the 350. he's gonna try to make a hybrid. he is gonna put the 350 in to an older ford i think that it is a 60's model. sounds cool but will it work?
    i have a nother question. to get to the neutral safety switch, do i have to take the whole dash thats surrounding all my meters and stuff? and how much would a new one cost if it is worn out and how can i tell if the switch is worn out?
    ??????

  5. #50
    LanceX is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    seguin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 82 chevy silverado
    Posts
    18

    i don't know what i am looking at when i look at the above pic. what is it ? is it fast? does the car that its in have good traction? i love speed and traction!! thats why i want a fast car one of these days!
    ??????

  6. #51
    CanAmThunder is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    5

    Hi,
    Yes it has decent traction in 3rd, 4th and 5th.

  7. #52
    treekiller's Avatar
    treekiller is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    eastern part
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1934 Schwinn
    Posts
    747

    Question

     



    Thats not much of a gas tank, I guess .....thats why you have " 2 ", I couldn't even make it to the store on that , in my 454' .
    "Whad'ya want for nuth'N, ..............aaa,rrrrrubber biscuit... ?"

    "bad spellers of the word untie ! "

    If your wondering how I'm doing I'm > " I'm still pick'N up the shinny stuff and passing open windows "

  8. #53
    CanAmThunder is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    5

    I feel it would be unfair of me not to mention that we produce the 305c.i. by "destroking" a327.

  9. #54
    screamer63_1979's Avatar
    screamer63_1979 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Beaver
    Car Year, Make, Model: 90 Jeep Wrangler
    Posts
    368

    I am more familiar with revs and motorcycle engines...10k revs is not unheard of, and Yamaha made a 250cc 4 cylinder that revved to 19,000!! for sale in japan a few years back.

    ON bikes that rev like crazy, you shift MORE because the powerband is in a very narrow rev range. I can see where fewer shifts would save 'time'.
    Chris
    Only the dead fish go with the flow.

  10. #55
    71nova's Avatar
    71nova is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ohio
    Car Year, Make, Model: 71 Chevy Nova
    Posts
    175

    i think theres a saying that goes around, "theres no replacement for displacement" thats quite true in the HOT ROD world i think, im sure you could make 1000 horse from a 305 but nobody tosses around 20K at a time that i no of.

  11. #56
    pfcjal is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Louisiana
    Car Year, Make, Model: 73 Chevy pickup
    Posts
    21

    if you have a shorter stroke then there is actually less distance being traveled hence the motor will turn faster. So being that your taking a 327(3.25 stroke) which already has a shorter stroke than a 305, and shortening it to appr. 3.03" then naturally tehd motor is going to rev higher, therefore total displacement is not that much of a factor in realation to peak rpm's. Just my 2 cents

  12. #57
    screamer63_1979's Avatar
    screamer63_1979 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Beaver
    Car Year, Make, Model: 90 Jeep Wrangler
    Posts
    368

    Don't recall the figure, but revs are limited by piston speed, as in feet per second traveled in the cylinder. There is some max for this.

    also, lighter pistons and stronger rods help get teh revs up there, as does shorter stroke. you also need a very good valve train!

    Ducati doesn;t use valve springs to close their valves, so in theory you have less inertia and no float and should be able to get more revs. Of course, valve adjustments are horrendously expensive and needed frequently.
    Chris
    Only the dead fish go with the flow.

  13. #58
    Z28GEN3 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Litchfield Park
    Posts
    7

    Originally posted by screamer63_1979
    MSD - Multi Spark Discharge (also a company that makes ignitions). Stock ignition systems make ONE spark to fire the mixture. MSD ignitions fire multiple sparks very quickly to fire the mixture.
    and who says you dont learn something new everyday.


    that 305 engine your talking about isnt practicle theres cheaper ways to make that amount of horse power a complete RAMJET 502 will make from a starting point 500hp and that leaves tons of room for mods all for about $9K



  14. #59
    Z28GEN3 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Litchfield Park
    Posts
    7

    back on the subject of a 327 i have one thats making about 400hp and 400tq with no exotic mods, just a camshaft and roller rockers, and some racing parts, but i didnt spend over $3k for it. the manifold was the most expensive part other then the forged crank



Reply To Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink