Thread: Cooling for power
-
12-14-2005 07:10 PM #16
Here is another idea.If you get it close what would happen if you installed a little thicker head gasket.Cometic makes gasket thickness's .051,.060,.065,.071,.074.You might have to change push rod length to get your pushrod geometry correct.
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
12-14-2005 08:38 PM #17
This is a very interesting thread. The experiment seems to be making great progress. Didn't Edelbrock market a water injection system a few years ago? Did anyone have any experience with it?
Art
-
12-14-2005 09:12 PM #18
Water injection is very effective. I know of someone with an airplane that has a 3350 cu in radial engine or so that is supercharged and running N2O. When operating at full power, the engine would melt down within seconds if the water injection system failed. He's making about 4400 hp.
-
12-14-2005 10:28 PM #19
Originally posted by oldman2
This is a very interesting thread. The experiment seems to be making great progress. Didn't Edelbrock market a water injection system a few years ago? Did anyone have any experience with it?
Art
I'm very impressed with the progress that camaro_fever68 has made in understanding the internal combustion process and I commend him for being a forward-thinker.
Dave, thanks for some outstanding input on this thread.PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
12-14-2005 11:28 PM #20
Being that camaro_fever68 is kind of volunteering his engine in this noble experiment, I think a couple of simple safety items might be in order. Obviously running 10.9:1 on 89 octane could turn ugly quickly with a failure during hard acceleration. Maybe some kind of pressure sensor in the water line linked to a serious idiot light to indicate zero pressure if the throttle sensor had the system turned on. Additionally, using a washer tank that had a low fluid signal system might be a good idea.
-
12-15-2005 04:43 AM #21
Thanks Tech!! I ran one of the old Edelbrock units myself years ago. Curious to see how this works out myself. A bit of a cushion against detonation would be good.Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
12-15-2005 10:30 AM #22
Originally posted by oldman2
Being that camaro_fever68 is kind of volunteering his engine in this noble experiment, I think a couple of simple safety items might be in order. Obviously running 10.9:1 on 89 octane could turn ugly quickly with a failure during hard acceleration. Maybe some kind of pressure sensor in the water line linked to a serious idiot light to indicate zero pressure if the throttle sensor had the system turned on. Additionally, using a washer tank that had a low fluid signal system might be a good idea.
I just got a call that my friend found some reservoirs with dual pumps. That may be pretty interesting. I'll wire them both in and hook em to a y-connector maybe. Project rolling onLast edited by camaro_fever68; 12-15-2005 at 10:37 AM.
RAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
-
12-15-2005 11:12 AM #23
Originally posted by erik erikson
Here is another idea.If you get it close what would happen if you installed a little thicker head gasket.Cometic makes gasket thickness's .051,.060,.065,.071,.074.You might have to change push rod length to get your pushrod geometry correct.
If I get what close?RAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
-
12-15-2005 11:34 AM #24
it would be nice to uses the boost of the engine to pressurerise the system or one leg 10 psi may help bust up the water in to a finner mist or the boost could turn on a psi switch you can buy all types at the parts store and run the switch on the ground side or the ground side of the relay. if you used the boost you would need no switch on relays or wire work. it would go on by the boost psi by pessure in the tank you would need a check valve in line to keep it from dripping in when not on????Last edited by pat mccarthy; 12-15-2005 at 01:34 PM.
-
12-15-2005 05:48 PM #25
"you would need a check valve in line to keep it from dripping in when not on???"
You could mount the reservoir lower than the spray bars, that way it wouldn't dribble. I wonder if it might siphon out though due to the vacuum created at the bars under the carb???? My Edelbrock unit doesn't siphon though, so I guess it would be o.k.PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
12-15-2005 06:09 PM #26
well this was some thing i was kicking a round.i like the sound of it ?
-
12-15-2005 06:38 PM #27
Originally posted by camaro_fever68
I don't uderstand what you mean
If I get what close?
-
12-15-2005 08:19 PM #28
In looking back on this thread, a cpouple of stray thoughts flew through my head.
#1. Have you tried anything using Techs suggestion of alcohol earlier in the thread?
#2. My home water supply runs 80 PSI and I still get mineral buildup in the needle spray of my showerhead. I would suggest distilled water would probably diminish that for the most part. You had earlier mentioned that you were running .010 jets at the moment and it wouldn't take much to create an obstruction in that small an orfice. Our tap water in SoCal is notoriously hard and your local water supply could have a far lower mineral content.
Art
-
12-16-2005 03:51 AM #29
Everyone has some good advise on here and it's helping a lot. I appreciate very much.
I am using rubbing alcohol A2O two bottles alcohol 1 bottle water. That was a good point on the water situation. I can get purified water for a quarter per gallon at the oasis automatic water station. I'm collecting parts and designing on the drawing board now. This engine seems to like a lot more timing with the injection. I'm guessing the water is slowing the burn down????? It's hard to find good tuning info but I think we can figure it out. As soon as I finish designing I'll build and install. I think it will be much easier with a blower setup than naturally aspirated. After I figure this one out and it works I'll start on the blower motor.RAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
-
12-16-2005 10:28 PM #30
Ray do you or anyone else out there know how many psi a windshield washer pump puts out? I'm sure there's quite a variation so if anyone has a number, please state what the pump was on. I'm trying to figure out how many gph your current .010/.010 jetting is putting out.
Art
I wanted to complain about this NZ slang business, but I see it was resolved before it mattered. LOL..
the Official CHR joke page duel