Thread: To Zero Deck Or Not?
Hybrid View
-
12-12-2005 03:15 PM #1
Re: To Zero Deck Or Not?
Originally posted by MainCap
Have been researching piston height to deck clearance for my new 383 build to try and acheive a nominal .040 quench distance and based upon available head gasket thicknesses and bore I am wondering what most of you do to acheive your quench clearances and desired cylinder volumes.
First, for a stock 9.025 deck ht, 3.75 stroke, 5.7" rod length and a KB135 18cc D-Cup .030 overbore piston with a compression height of 1.433, I calculate a nominal deck clearance of .017" - probably slightly less after leveling the deck. Gasket thicknesses - most with significantly more than .030 overbore - range from .015 thick to well over .040 thick.
So my questions are;
1) Is it normal or desirable to use a head gasket with up to say a 4.1" bore with a 4.030 cylinder bore", or would you try to use a head gasket that more closely matches the cylinder bore?
2) Would you zero deck the block (zero piston to deck clearance) and use a .040 thick gasket, or just mill the deck enough to match a given gasket thickness to acheive an .040 quench?
My confusion comes from what appears to me to be a head gasket mis-match between available bores and thicknesses, in that I can acheive my nominal .040 quench ht without completely zeroing the deck ht if I do not concern myself with a significant overbore on the head gasket. Am I missing something? What would you do?
Thanks for any advice!
Ditto on the model kits! My best were lost when the Hobby Shop burned under suspicious circumstances....
How did you get hooked on cars?