Thread: 383 Low rwhp, tq
-
12-15-2005 04:46 AM #31
I'm still a 3 pedal guy, but I don't understand how a hi stall converter would lower torque and horsepower on a chassis dyno. Is the slippage that bad, or what????Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
12-15-2005 07:08 AM #32
Originally posted by 73RS
big_G1, what stall are you running. Stall converters will give you some lower numbers on the dyno torque and HP. The bigger the stall the worse it gets.
-
12-15-2005 11:07 AM #33
Originally posted by big_G1
Thanks for the advice. I called Comp Cams earlier today, they recommended a very similar cam, XR280R. I ordered it today. Thanks for all your help, I'll let you know how it worked out.RAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
-
12-15-2005 11:22 AM #34
Originally posted by camaro_fever68
What are the plans with this engine? Prostreet, mostly strip, Hot street, daily driver(hope not) That 280 is a decent cam and might make some more horses. It on a 110 lsa, calls for 10:1 CR and wants a 2800 stall with 3.73-3.90 rear gear. You might wanna go to www.racingjunk.com and list those heads for trade or something. They are a little to much to try to tame down and produce decent torque levels. Horsepower will come but higher in the RPM range.
I wanted to complain about this NZ slang business, but I see it was resolved before it mattered. LOL..
the Official CHR joke page duel