Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Max Dynamic Compression Ratio?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20
  1. #1
    MainCap is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: '94 K1500 Suburban, Swapping to 383 TBI
    Posts
    66

    Max Dynamic Compression Ratio?

     



    Anybody now what the recommended maximum allowable DYNAMIC compression ratio is for 87,89,and 91 octane unleaded pump gasoline, for an iron head engine with .040 quench under towing load scenarios?

    KB's site suggests no more than an 8:1 dynamic CR under the best (light load?) conditions without getting exotic. They also indicate a static CR of no more than 8.5:1 for an engine used for towing that is running on regular unleaded gasoline. I do not find how much more CR can be run with higher than 87 octane pump gas.

    I can drop my dynamic CR by running a cam with a later intake valve closing, or I can choose a 28cc dish top piston that will drop my static CR to 8.8 - which seems low to me. I could also drop a cc or two out of my 64cc heads and stick with an 18cc D-cup piston for a static CR of about 9.5:1 but would 89 or 91 octane keep me out of detonation?

  2. #2
    MainCap is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: '94 K1500 Suburban, Swapping to 383 TBI
    Posts
    66

    I forgot to mention that my truck is also equipped with an electronic spark control/knock sensor that retards the timing when it senses detonation. Do you think 9.5:1 static CR is too high with this system as well?

  3. #3
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Re: Max Dynamic Compression Ratio?

     



    Originally posted by MainCap
    Anybody now what the recommended maximum allowable DYNAMIC compression ratio is for 87,89,and 91 octane unleaded pump gasoline, for an iron head engine with .040 quench under towing load scenarios?

    KB's site suggests no more than an 8:1 dynamic CR under the best (light load?) conditions without getting exotic. They also indicate a static CR of no more than 8.5:1 for an engine used for towing that is running on regular unleaded gasoline. I do not find how much more CR can be run with higher than 87 octane pump gas.

    I can drop my dynamic CR by running a cam with a later intake valve closing, or I can choose a 28cc dish top piston that will drop my static CR to 8.8 - which seems low to me. I could also drop a cc or two out of my 64cc heads and stick with an 18cc D-cup piston for a static CR of about 9.5:1 but would 89 or 91 octane keep me out of detonation?
    run a .037-.039 quench area and polish the combustion chambers in the heads to eliminate hot spots
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  4. #4
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    Re: Max Dynamic Compression Ratio?

     



    Originally posted by MainCap
    Anybody now what the recommended maximum allowable DYNAMIC compression ratio is for 87,89,and 91 octane unleaded pump gasoline, for an iron head engine with .040 quench under towing load scenarios?

    KB's site suggests no more than an 8:1 dynamic CR under the best (light load?) conditions without getting exotic. They also indicate a static CR of no more than 8.5:1 for an engine used for towing that is running on regular unleaded gasoline. I do not find how much more CR can be run with higher than 87 octane pump gas.

    I can drop my dynamic CR by running a cam with a later intake valve closing, or I can choose a 28cc dish top piston that will drop my static CR to 8.8 - which seems low to me. I could also drop a cc or two out of my 64cc heads and stick with an 18cc D-cup piston for a static CR of about 9.5:1 but would 89 or 91 octane keep me out of detonation?
    I think KB is right on about it's suggestions. Yes, you can drop DCR by going with a cam with a later opening or with a lower SCR by using dished pistons. You might talk with CompCams cam help line about an RV cam that would suit your towing/compression requirements. DCR is a better guide to go by than SCR because the choice of cam will delineate how an engine will run on pump gas more accurately. Normally, a performance engine with iron heads should have a DCR under 8.0. Aluminum heads can get away with .5 more. But 8.0 and 8.5 maximum numbers is figured using 92 octane. I would shoot for a DCR of around 7.75 if you want to use 87 or 89 octane.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  5. #5
    MainCap is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: '94 K1500 Suburban, Swapping to 383 TBI
    Posts
    66

    Thanks for all the advice.

    I'm trying to get there from here but piston selection seems pretty thin when using 64cc Vortec heads.

    As an aside, I was just reading a CHP article posted on CompCams site regarding an equivelent build in both a 355 and 383 intended to run on 87 octane. They chose pistons with a static CR of 9.75:1! Obtained over 500hp as well on 87 Octane. Interesting...

    Anyway, with my intended cam the intake closing is just past 60 degrees ABDC. With a 5.7" rod my dynamic CR would be ~7.93 with 18cc D-cup pistons. A 28cc piston yields a dynamic CR of ~7.25:1. These two pistons yield a static CR of ~9.55/8.7:1 respectively, using an .040 quench distance.

    Wish I could find a D-Cup stroker piston in the 22-24cc range as I'd like to hit a static CR of ~9.0:1...
    Last edited by MainCap; 12-22-2005 at 06:02 AM.

  6. #6
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by MainCap
    Thanks for all the advice.

    I'm trying to get there from here but piston selection seems pretty thin when using 64cc Vortec heads.

    As an aside, I was just reading a CHP article posted on CompCams site regarding an equivelent build in both a 355 and 383 intended to run on 87 octane. They chose pistons with a static CR of 9.75:1! Obtained over 500hp as well on 87 Octane. Interesting...

    Anyway, with my intended cam the intake closing is just past 60 degrees ABDC. With a 5.7" rod my dynamic CR would be ~7.93 with 18cc D-cup pistons. A 28cc piston yields a dynamic CR of ~7.25:1. These two pistons yield a static CR of ~9.55/8.7:1 respectively, using an .040 quench distance.

    Wish I could find a D-Cup stroker piston in the 22-24cc range as I'd like to hit a static CR of ~9.0:1...
    You never said how much money you wanted to spend.These pistons might be over -kill for you but I think they are what you are looking for.JE part #131636.Yes they are exspensive.Check out there web site www.jepistons.com.
    Last edited by erik erikson; 12-22-2005 at 06:35 AM.

  7. #7
    MainCap is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: '94 K1500 Suburban, Swapping to 383 TBI
    Posts
    66

    Thanks Eric, but those JE 131636 pistons are for a 355ci (3.48 stroke). I need a 22-24cc dish for a 383 (3.75 stroke with a 5.7 rod).

    Do you happen to know if it is possible to machine 4cc's out of an 18cc D-Cup piston, or would this throw the CG all out of whack.

    Wonder if KB custom builds/modifies pistons?

    I guess I'd be willing to spend a few hundred extra to get it right as it would not grossly effect the end cost - pushing over $4k when all is said and done anyway.
    Last edited by MainCap; 12-22-2005 at 06:59 AM.

  8. #8
    tcodi's Avatar
    tcodi is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    parkesburg
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1950 chevy pickup
    Posts
    580

    Does adding lead have any adverse affects on the engine (non emission vehicle), or just the environment.

  9. #9
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by MainCap
    Thanks Eric, but those JE 131636 pistons are for a 355ci (3.48 stroke). I need a 22-24cc dish for a 383 (3.75 stroke with a 5.7 rod).

    Do you happen to know if it is possible to machine 4cc's out of an 18cc D-Cup piston, or would this throw the CG all out of whack.

    Wonder if KB custom builds/modifies pistons?

    I guess I'd be willing to spend a few hundred extra to get it right as it would not grossly effect the end cost - pushing over $4k when all is said and done anyway.
    I mis-understood.I thought I read about both a 355 and a 383.I was un-sure about what you where building.Why not get a little thicker head gasket?

  10. #10
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    On a non-emission vehicle, tetraethyl lead will slow down the burn by interspersing molecules of a non-combustable material in between the molecules of the fuel/air mixture and thus helping to prevent pre-ignition and detonation, allow the use of more ignition lead and coat the valve seat and valve faces which in effect "dirties them up" so they cannot weld to each other resulting in valve recession.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  11. #11
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Another great thing about tetraethyllead is it's lubricating properties in the valve seat area.I would where gloves if you handle it.

  12. #12
    MainCap is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: '94 K1500 Suburban, Swapping to 383 TBI
    Posts
    66

    Eric,

    I'm working up a 383.

    I'm trying not to exceed an .040" quench distance and so don't want to run a thicker head gasket. Most data suggests that running a higher quench than this also increases potential for detonation.

  13. #13
    tcodi's Avatar
    tcodi is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    parkesburg
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1950 chevy pickup
    Posts
    580

    so if I need to use lead it won't hurt my engine?

    Where do you pick that stuff up nowadays anyhow?
    What is a good amount of lead/gallon to start with to see
    if it solves the problem?

  14. #14
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    if you need more cc .work out the heads grind and polish them i would do this any ways scribe them to the block or head gaskets do not go right up to the edge keep back from it by0.030 or so and get all the junk out off the head and cc one and see were you are at

  15. #15
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Re: Max Dynamic Compression Ratio?

     



    Originally posted by MainCap
    Anybody now what the recommended maximum allowable DYNAMIC compression ratio is for 87,89,and 91 octane unleaded pump gasoline, for an iron head engine with .040 quench under towing load scenarios?

    KB's site suggests no more than an 8:1 dynamic CR under the best (light load?) conditions without getting exotic. They also indicate a static CR of no more than 8.5:1 for an engine used for towing that is running on regular unleaded gasoline. I do not find how much more CR can be run with higher than 87 octane pump gas.

    I can drop my dynamic CR by running a cam with a later intake valve closing, or I can choose a 28cc dish top piston that will drop my static CR to 8.8 - which seems low to me. I could also drop a cc or two out of my 64cc heads and stick with an 18cc D-cup piston for a static CR of about 9.5:1 but would 89 or 91 octane keep me out of detonation?
    I would just try and keep the comp. ratio 9.25 to 1 or less.This is a truck not a race car.It sounds to me like you are trying to pick fly poop out of the pepper.

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink