Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: what cam is best ?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 44
  1. #16
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Originally posted by allmine69rs
    well if he can help me then y is it that he had to talk about trying to impress the geeks down at the local drive in and all that shit i was jusst asking for advicxe if he is still on please i will listen i thought he was giving me shit about my ride
    I apologize. Let's start again.
    Why do you want the motor to idle roughly?
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  2. #17
    allmine69rs is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    rollinsford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 camaro rs convertible
    Posts
    9

    i bought the car off of my father he needed money and i wanted that car since i was old enough to know wut it was and wut it could be

  3. #18
    allmine69rs is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    rollinsford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 camaro rs convertible
    Posts
    9

    tech" i apoligize too... now that, thats out of the way... i dont want anything extreme i just wanted a lil bit rougher idle to make it sound a lil bit better and for a lil bit more performance but if i cant do that without putting alot of money into my motor
    (cause this motor only has 1,000 miles on it)then i think i just might stick with stock . you know what i mean ?

  4. #19
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    "wanted a lil bit rougher idle to make it sound a lil bit better"

    OK, this is what I was trying to explain to you. You want a lumpy idle to impress other people, mainly the ones who don't have a clue that a lumpy idle DOES NOT mean that the car is fast.

    A lumpy idle is the sound of the motor being inefficient. It's the mixture being blown back up the intake tract by the piston and disrupting the airflow through the carburetor venturis. If the airflow is disrupted, the carb CANNOT meter properly, so the motor idles improperly (lumpy).

    In order to make a lumpy cam work, you will need more static compression ratio, a looser converter and a shorter rear gear.
    If you install a long, lumpy cam in an otherwise stock motor, it will be slower than if was with the stock cam and it will be a pain in the ass to drive. That's what I was trying to explain to you.

    If you do not plan to change the c.r., etc. and just want a little more power, call your favorite cam grinder and ask for a recommendation. They'll do that for you for free.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  5. #20
    Henry Rifle's Avatar
    Henry Rifle is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Little Elm
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford Low Boy w/ZZ430 Clone
    Posts
    3,890

    Originally posted by allmine69rs
    well if he can help me then y is it that he had to talk about trying to impress the geeks down at the local drive in and all that shit i was jusst asking for advicxe if he is still on please i will listen i thought he was giving me shit about my ride
    Two small points. Your posts would be easier to read if you canned the Yahoo chatroom lingo (y, ur, etc.). No big deal to me, but it's hard for some folks to read. Second, there are other words that can easily be substituted for "s**t."
    Jack

    Gone to Texas

  6. #21
    monkeystripe is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    ann arbor
    Posts
    3

    cam for u?

     



    I completely agree with techinspector1 and henry rifle. A lumpy cam that is not augmented by increased compression ratio will result in a miserable drive. having a part that is made to operate at high rpms-without utilizing it at high RPMs, will result in a miserable drive. I dont think anyone here can give you an easy answer. do your homework, and check with the reps about your particular setup. But dont expect to go too radical without altering the internals to complement the cam. and as henry rifle said if you want it to just sound like it could stall at any second just mess with your A/F ratio until it barely idles- problem solved.

  7. #22
    allmine69rs is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    rollinsford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 camaro rs convertible
    Posts
    9

    ok so just to sum it all up i wont be able to put a mild cam in my set up without doing other thigns to the motor well thank you for all the help and sorry for the misunderstanding.....

  8. #23
    allmine69rs is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    rollinsford
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 camaro rs convertible
    Posts
    9

    hey techinspector would it hurt me or help me if i put 5.0 ltr heads on my 5.7?...i've herard both i just want a more profesional opinion....

  9. #24
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Thumbs up

     



    Originally posted by allmine69rs
    hey techinspector would it hurt me or help me if i put 5.0 ltr heads on my 5.7?...i've herard both i just want a more profesional opinion....
    It will raise your comp. ratio by going to the 305 heads.The bad thing is the intake valve is shrouded more.Tech. any thoughts on this?

  10. #25
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    No, you've covered it Erik. Thanks.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  11. #26
    68chevytrkr is offline Registered User Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Angelo
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Chevy SWB
    Posts
    1

    What cam is best?

     



    You might talk to Comp Cams or a dealer about their "Thumper" series. These cams have a great sound and a good performance boost while retaining plenty of vacuum. The manufacrurer can recommend one for your application.

  12. #27
    Big Tracks's Avatar
    Big Tracks is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Keller
    Car Year, Make, Model: '79 Dodge Diplomat Coupe
    Posts
    832

    Quote Originally Posted by Henry Rifle
    By the way, you can get a rough idle by messing with the fuel mixture. No need for a cam. Besides, you just slammed the guy who is the most able to provide you info.
    The method most used by myself and other well informed 15-16 year old hot rod experts was to utilize a blown-out muffler and pull off a plug wire or two. It made my '39 Dodge four-door with a stock flathead six sound like a real bear.

    Jim

  13. #28
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    What is this late model truck engine out of? and what year? First of all, I'm pretty sure if that's a Vortec engine you have, it is going to be a hydraulic roller cam stock. That means the engine has to be 1996 or newer. And correct me if I'm wrong but the engine should have around 9:1 compression on the late model vortec engines. GM Performance makes a "HOT" cam specifically for that engine. I would check it out. My friend put a '99 cadillac vortec in his '72 chevelle with a GM Hot cam in it and it sounded pretty good. A little lope, but not too much. But yes, you will eventually need to put a converter in there. Just save your money and do it.

  14. #29
    69elko's Avatar
    69elko is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    San Jose
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1969 El Camino SS396 350HP
    Posts
    227

    Oh yeah, and keep your Vortec heads. They support 400hp stock. 305 heads are garbage.

  15. #30
    555nova is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    beaverton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 70ss nova
    Posts
    16

    the kid asks a question and all you have is neg comments inspector gaget. you dont list a car and your calling the kid a geek and dweeb.you sound like a beer drinking bench racer.what makes you the awser man read alot of hot magazines.
    1500hp 70 nova

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink