Thread: what cam is best ?
-
01-17-2006 06:32 PM #16
Originally posted by allmine69rs
well if he can help me then y is it that he had to talk about trying to impress the geeks down at the local drive in and all that shit i was jusst asking for advicxe if he is still on please i will listen i thought he was giving me shit about my ride
Why do you want the motor to idle roughly?PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
01-17-2006 06:57 PM #17
i bought the car off of my father he needed money and i wanted that car since i was old enough to know wut it was and wut it could be
-
01-17-2006 07:05 PM #18
tech" i apoligize too... now that, thats out of the way... i dont want anything extreme i just wanted a lil bit rougher idle to make it sound a lil bit better and for a lil bit more performance but if i cant do that without putting alot of money into my motor
(cause this motor only has 1,000 miles on it)then i think i just might stick with stock . you know what i mean ?
-
01-17-2006 07:45 PM #19
"wanted a lil bit rougher idle to make it sound a lil bit better"
OK, this is what I was trying to explain to you. You want a lumpy idle to impress other people, mainly the ones who don't have a clue that a lumpy idle DOES NOT mean that the car is fast.
A lumpy idle is the sound of the motor being inefficient. It's the mixture being blown back up the intake tract by the piston and disrupting the airflow through the carburetor venturis. If the airflow is disrupted, the carb CANNOT meter properly, so the motor idles improperly (lumpy).
In order to make a lumpy cam work, you will need more static compression ratio, a looser converter and a shorter rear gear.
If you install a long, lumpy cam in an otherwise stock motor, it will be slower than if was with the stock cam and it will be a pain in the ass to drive. That's what I was trying to explain to you.
If you do not plan to change the c.r., etc. and just want a little more power, call your favorite cam grinder and ask for a recommendation. They'll do that for you for free.PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
01-17-2006 08:04 PM #20
Originally posted by allmine69rs
well if he can help me then y is it that he had to talk about trying to impress the geeks down at the local drive in and all that shit i was jusst asking for advicxe if he is still on please i will listen i thought he was giving me shit about my rideJack
Gone to Texas
-
01-17-2006 08:16 PM #21
cam for u?
I completely agree with techinspector1 and henry rifle. A lumpy cam that is not augmented by increased compression ratio will result in a miserable drive. having a part that is made to operate at high rpms-without utilizing it at high RPMs, will result in a miserable drive. I dont think anyone here can give you an easy answer. do your homework, and check with the reps about your particular setup. But dont expect to go too radical without altering the internals to complement the cam. and as henry rifle said if you want it to just sound like it could stall at any second just mess with your A/F ratio until it barely idles- problem solved.
-
01-18-2006 06:02 PM #22
ok so just to sum it all up i wont be able to put a mild cam in my set up without doing other thigns to the motor well thank you for all the help and sorry for the misunderstanding.....
-
01-18-2006 06:05 PM #23
hey techinspector would it hurt me or help me if i put 5.0 ltr heads on my 5.7?...i've herard both i just want a more profesional opinion....
-
01-18-2006 06:17 PM #24
Originally posted by allmine69rs
hey techinspector would it hurt me or help me if i put 5.0 ltr heads on my 5.7?...i've herard both i just want a more profesional opinion....
-
02-11-2007 10:43 PM #25
No, you've covered it Erik. Thanks.PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
02-19-2007 11:03 AM #26
What cam is best?
You might talk to Comp Cams or a dealer about their "Thumper" series. These cams have a great sound and a good performance boost while retaining plenty of vacuum. The manufacrurer can recommend one for your application.
-
02-19-2007 02:00 PM #27
Originally Posted by Henry Rifle
Jim
-
02-19-2007 02:16 PM #28
What is this late model truck engine out of? and what year? First of all, I'm pretty sure if that's a Vortec engine you have, it is going to be a hydraulic roller cam stock. That means the engine has to be 1996 or newer. And correct me if I'm wrong but the engine should have around 9:1 compression on the late model vortec engines. GM Performance makes a "HOT" cam specifically for that engine. I would check it out. My friend put a '99 cadillac vortec in his '72 chevelle with a GM Hot cam in it and it sounded pretty good. A little lope, but not too much. But yes, you will eventually need to put a converter in there. Just save your money and do it.
-
02-19-2007 02:18 PM #29
Oh yeah, and keep your Vortec heads. They support 400hp stock. 305 heads are garbage.
-
02-24-2007 11:13 PM #30
the kid asks a question and all you have is neg comments inspector gaget. you dont list a car and your calling the kid a geek and dweeb.you sound like a beer drinking bench racer.what makes you the awser man read alot of hot magazines.1500hp 70 nova
A man was watching his wife as she prepared to fry sausages in a pan. He noticed that before placing the sausages in the pan, she always cut off both ends, threw them away, and cooked only the middle...
the Official CHR joke page duel