Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 400Hp 305?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Parisienne305 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Montreal
    Car Year, Make, Model: Pontiac Parisienne 1983
    Posts
    45

    Question 400Hp 305?

     



    Hey guys!

    I found the following "recipe" on the net and i'm wondering if it would do what the article said, 400Hp 305...?

    So here goes!

    Comp cam CS292-H-10,
    244 deg. duration at .050"lift,
    110 deg. lobe center,
    .501" net lift on each valve,
    Crane cams' .100" shorter pushrods,
    cylinder head from RHS (Racing Head Service),
    Manly Pro Flo valves (with mild porting),
    Victor Jr. intake manifold,
    modified 650 double pumper and finally,
    Hookers 1 3\4" primary headers into 3" Flowmasters.
    9.01 compression.

    So there it is! What do you think?

    Anybody feeling the urge to educate me about 305 being no good, blah blah blah, abstain! Don't waste my\your time, please!

    Hey Techinspector, i sure hope to get your input on this one!

    Ciao!

  2. #2
    richlo65 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    woodbury
    Car Year, Make, Model: Pontiac Fiero's
    Posts
    4

    well hell, if it doesnt work you got a good set up for a 350.

  3. #3
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    at what RPM does it make the 400 horse? I'v seen 400 hp spec builds on 305's. in reality, a 350 could make the same power, much cheaper but yes, 400 horse is not out of the question for a 305.
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  4. #4
    chevy 37's Avatar
    chevy 37 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Auburn
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1937 chevy truck& 33 fordtruck
    Posts
    3,017

    My 305 is only 96HP from 400 and if I put some good heads on it I'd probably pick up another 30 . Don't honestly know if I could get 400HP from my 305, but it would be sweet. Does the article say if the 400 is from the crank or rear wheels?
    Keep smiling, it only hurts when you think it does!

  5. #5
    kitz's Avatar
    kitz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Roadster, BBC
    Posts
    962

    Dude I appreciate you and your dilemma.

    But I gotta tell you that I would not try to build a 305 with YOUR money.

    Start with the readily available and inexpensive 350 ........................

    Best Wishes, Kitz
    Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400

  6. #6
    Swifster's Avatar
    Swifster is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sterling Heights
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1964 Studebaker Commander
    Posts
    440

    I don't think you read the entire article. The engine dynoed had a final compression ratio of 10.6:1. The question to be asked is how often will you wind up a 2 ton Pontiac to 7200 RPM to get to the 400 HP mark?

    For driving on the street, especially for a heavy car like yours, torque rules. I'd be hunting a high torque number low in the power band. This is typically found thru displacement (engine size).
    ---Tom

    1964 Studebaker Commander
    1964 Studebaker Daytona

  7. #7
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    I agree with Swifster & Kitz. Sounds like a law firm.

    Hmmm, Swifster & Kitz, Attorneys at Law.
    Last edited by techinspector1; 01-24-2006 at 10:25 PM.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  8. #8
    oldman2's Avatar
    oldman2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Riverside
    Car Year, Make, Model: 73 El Camino
    Posts
    69

    Comp Cams recommended the same cam to me for my 350 running 11.1:1 compression, but I went with a smaller cam for more low end torque and at least a little vacuum for street use. They said if I was lucky, I'd get 10" Hg @1000 rpm.

  9. #9
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Re: 400Hp 305?

     



    Originally posted by Parisienne305
    Hey guys!

    I found the following "recipe" on the net and i'm wondering if it would do what the article said, 400Hp 305...?

    So here goes!

    Comp cam CS292-H-10,
    244 deg. duration at .050"lift,
    110 deg. lobe center,
    .501" net lift on each valve,
    Crane cams' .100" shorter pushrods,
    cylinder head from RHS (Racing Head Service),
    Manly Pro Flo valves (with mild porting),
    Victor Jr. intake manifold,
    modified 650 double pumper and finally,
    Hookers 1 3\4" primary headers into 3" Flowmasters.
    9.01 compression.

    So there it is! What do you think?

    Anybody feeling the urge to educate me about 305 being no good, blah blah blah, abstain! Don't waste my\your time, please!

    Hey Techinspector, i sure hope to get your input on this one!

    Ciao!
    If you had the same combo. in a 383 it might even be (streetable).

  10. #10
    Parisienne305 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Montreal
    Car Year, Make, Model: Pontiac Parisienne 1983
    Posts
    45

    Thanks guys!

    I do have a 350 in stock (in another car), but i found the concept interesting...

    If i do something with the 350, what kind of "bolt-on" parts could i use to get great low end torque and decent power for my "2 ton car"? Please specify every part!

    Thanks again!

  11. #11
    hambiskit is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Shelton
    Posts
    693

    It's a Pontiac.....high torque big blocks stock...I don't get it.
    Jim

  12. #12
    Parisienne305 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Montreal
    Car Year, Make, Model: Pontiac Parisienne 1983
    Posts
    45

    Hey Hambiskit...i'm not sure i get your point...
    What are you saying?

  13. #13
    Swifster's Avatar
    Swifster is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sterling Heights
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1964 Studebaker Commander
    Posts
    440

    Originally posted by hambiskit
    It's a Pontiac.....high torque big blocks stock...I don't get it.
    Yeah, as Denny posted above, a Parisienne is a Chevy Caprice with a Pontiac grille. If I remember correctly, the largest engine was the Chevy 350.

    As for engine suggestions, I'd go with a Pontiac 455. Car Craft did a build up on one of these.

    Car Craft article: From Junker to Thumper
    ---Tom

    1964 Studebaker Commander
    1964 Studebaker Daytona

  14. #14
    Parisienne305 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Montreal
    Car Year, Make, Model: Pontiac Parisienne 1983
    Posts
    45

    OK guys!

    But i'm still not sure what he meant...but i do get the point that bigger motor does better torque.

    I also know that my car was the counterpart of Chevy Caprice...not really a classic but a good sleeper!

    I found a 400 for 200$ and a 454 for 650$...if i get the dough before it's gone, it'll be mine!

  15. #15
    MadMax's Avatar
    MadMax is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Munich
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1983 Chevy 5,7l G20
    Posts
    213

    I read an articel a couple of days ago on a chap who tunes Suzuki motorbikes. He gets 390 HP (apparently dynoed) out of a 1400cc four cylinder Boxer-Engine. But that's turning 10.500 RPMs. It's all an RPM-thing. I just don't see the point in paying a lot of money for a small engine that has to turn so high. You'll get problems with bottom end-parts breaking and the dizzy will run out of spark and you'll get real friction problems if you go far over 6.500 very often on a 305. There's so much more you'll have to do to it to make it work really well... Get a Stroker if you want power at low engine speeds. Building a 383 with 400 horses isn't a that big deal... If you go for a Pontiac, they have quite a lot of torque from the start, drop in a 6.6l Pontiac and give it a nice intake, headers, a hot cam and some decent heads (probably no need to go aftermarket, just common sense porting should do it) and you'll be heading at that number for under 2k.
    just my penny worth,
    greetings from across the pond

    and BTW: what sense does it make to state what length pushrods you need? depends on your gasket, on whether the block is decked, the heads milled, what rockers you use, what valves...
    Harharhar...

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink