Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: cam question
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    muteboy49's Avatar
    muteboy49 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Taylor
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 Mark VII
    Posts
    492

    cam question

     



    ok this is for my friend, hes got a 350 with somewhere close to a 11:1 CR with stock heads he got ported with 1.95 1.50 valves
    he doesnt know what size cam to go with hes thinking of a cam with
    .533/.533 lift
    .245/264 duration at .050 inch
    .312/.322 advertised duration
    or this one,
    .570/.570 lift
    .274/.274 duration at .050 inch
    .320/.320 advertised duration
    what do you guys think?

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Too much cam for the c.r.
    Call a cam grinder for a recommendation.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  3. #3
    muteboy49's Avatar
    muteboy49 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Taylor
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 Mark VII
    Posts
    492

    too much lift or duration

  4. #4
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    duration
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  5. #5
    muteboy49's Avatar
    muteboy49 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Taylor
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 Mark VII
    Posts
    492

    this any better
    Duration at 050 inch Lift: 244 int./254 exh.
    Advertised Duration: 302 int./312 exh

  6. #6
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Personally, I'd be thinkin' something like this....

    http://www.cranecams.com/?show=brows...tType=camshaft

    or this...

    http://www.cranecams.com/?show=brows...tType=camshaft

    I hope you have enough cylinder head to make this type of cam work at 7,000+.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  7. #7
    muteboy49's Avatar
    muteboy49 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Taylor
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 Mark VII
    Posts
    492

    ill tell him but i think hes got his heart set on this
    244/254 at .050 lift
    and .510/.533 lift
    thanks

  8. #8
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    whatever.
    You can see that these two cams I've shown have the intake valve closing at 46 to 48 degrees after bottom dead center (measured at 0.050" lift). If you close the intake later than that, you won't trap as much cylinder pressure and the motor will be slower. CHOOSE A CAM WITH LOGIC, NOT EMOTIONS.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  9. #9
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Originally posted by muteboy49
    ill tell him but i think hes got his heart set on this
    244/254 at .050 lift
    and .510/.533 lift
    thanks
    Try hard to convince him to listen. Tech knows his stuff. You must use a cam the engine wants, not what the person wants. Race car performance doesn't come by taking a shortcut straight to racecar cam. The entire engine must be taken into account for it's purpose. Just about any head that uses 1.94 valves is most certainly too small for those cams. Even cars that have the racecar "LOPE" have a fake, hollow sound that an experienced hotrodder can immediately notice if the compression isn't matched to the cam.
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  10. #10
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    The biggest mistakes novices make are choosing a cam that is way too big and a carburetor that is way too big. It is much better to have a cam and a carb a little on the small side than to have one too big. It is no fun fighting an ill-performing engine that does not live up to expectations because of mismatched parts. It is also a waste of a lot of money. You have to think of an engine as the sum of its parts, not just one part. Every choice you make will affect every other choice you make. Do your research and take the advice of experienced people and you won't go wrong.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  11. #11
    muteboy49's Avatar
    muteboy49 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Taylor
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 Mark VII
    Posts
    492

    i told him to go with something like mine (smaller lift and duration) and told him hes gonna be sad when he gets the motor done and he said he might change his mind. i really dont care
    thanks guys!

  12. #12
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    Some people just have to learn the hard way.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  13. #13
    muteboy49's Avatar
    muteboy49 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Taylor
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 Mark VII
    Posts
    492

    yep. and im not helping him pull his motor again lol

  14. #14
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    muteboy, the thing is, whatever cam he uses, the motor will sound o.k. and he'll brag about his choice. What he doesn't realize is that with a shorter cam, all the components would be matched up and he'd make more power. He'll never know that though, because he'll never dyno the combinations to find out.

    In order to help you a little more, please read this paper I compiled about camshafts. It starts off with an excellent piece written by Dimitri Elgin, owner of Elgin Cams......
    http://streetmachinesoftablerock.com...topic.php?t=78
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  15. #15
    muteboy49's Avatar
    muteboy49 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Taylor
    Car Year, Make, Model: 86 Mark VII
    Posts
    492

    thank you very much
    i will read it but i wont tell my buddy because i want to see the look on his face when i beat him at the track

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink