Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Intake options
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    s10streeter's Avatar
    s10streeter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    White Pine
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1986 S-10 SBC
    Posts
    203

    Intake options

     



    Can anyone give some pointers on choosing an intake upgrade for this engine:

    BLOCK: Cast iron with straight 4 bolt main bearing caps, late model one piece rear seal design. (10105123)
    CRANKSHAFT: Nodular cast iron one piece rear main design. (14088527)
    CONNECTING RODS: 1038 Forged steel. (14031310)
    PISTONS: Cast Aluminum. (12361371)
    PISTON RINGS: Standard design. (14089025)
    CAMSHAFT: New Special Performance Flat Tappet has .435” Intake and .460” exhaust lift. (24502476)
    CYLINDER HEADS: Cast iron with 64cc chambers, they “include” 1.94” intake and 1.50” exhaust valves, valve springs and caps, with straight type spark plug holes. (12356026)
    VALVE SPRINGS: This engine uses 1970 Corvette LT1 valve springs. (3911068)

    I presently have a GM aluminum 4bbl intake from a camaro(I think).
    I was pondering a Edelbrock performer or RPM. Do I have enough cam? Will these heads make use of the extra potential of the intake? Running with Headman swap/conversion headers in S-10.
    I am looking for a little more torque but dont want to sacrifice too much MPG.
    Duration on cam is 212/222.
    Fuel delivery: Edelbrock 1406 (650CFM?)
    Last edited by s10streeter; 02-04-2006 at 10:33 PM.

  2. #2
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    If you got an aluminum Z-28 style intake, good enough, if not, regular performer would be good enough.
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  3. #3
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Re: Intake options

     



    Originally posted by s10streeter
    Can anyone give some pointers on choosing an intake upgrade for this engine:

    BLOCK: Cast iron with straight 4 bolt main bearing caps, late model one piece rear seal design. (10105123)
    CRANKSHAFT: Nodular cast iron one piece rear main design. (14088527)
    CONNECTING RODS: 1038 Forged steel. (14031310)
    PISTONS: Cast Aluminum. (12361371)
    PISTON RINGS: Standard design. (14089025)
    CAMSHAFT: New Special Performance Flat Tappet has .435” Intake and .460” exhaust lift. (24502476)
    CYLINDER HEADS: Cast iron with 64cc chambers, they “include” 1.94” intake and 1.50” exhaust valves, valve springs and caps, with straight type spark plug holes. (12356026)
    VALVE SPRINGS: This engine uses 1970 Corvette LT1 valve springs. (3911068)

    I presently have a GM aluminum 4bbl intake from a camaro(I think).
    I was pondering a Edelbrock performer or RPM. Do I have enough cam? Will these heads make use of the extra potential of the intake? Running with Headman swap/conversion headers in S-10.
    I am looking for a little more torque but dont want to sacrifice too much MPG.
    Duration on cam is 212/222.
    Fuel delivery: Edelbrock 1406 (650CFM?)
    I would go with the Performer or a manifold like that one.

  4. #4
    halftanked is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Liberty
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1929 ford
    Posts
    504

    I ran a similar engine in my nova and then in a 1/2 ton 4x4,with a performer manifold,and a crane dual pattern cam with 460-480 lift,worked well in both. Hank

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink