Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Cubic Inches = Ahead In The Game
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 10 of 22 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 ... LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 317
  1. #136
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Originally posted by DennyW
    I think, no matter what you build, if you do it right, it's gonna be the best it can, on power, and mileage, no matter what the size. But, you need to start at the power source, and work your way back to the end, to get it all right.

    Besides, Big Blocks won't fit in everything.
    When did a 383 become a big block?
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  2. #137
    gassersrule_196's Avatar
    gassersrule_196 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lawrence
    Posts
    3,261

    In fact it will generally cost more to pull 350 hp out of a 302 than it will to pull that same power out of a 383.

    yeah ok 350 out of a 302 is EASSSSSSY

  3. #138
    gassersrule_196's Avatar
    gassersrule_196 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lawrence
    Posts
    3,261





    Originally posted by NTFDAY
    I'm not sure about the la la, but I can confirm the oh, oh, oh, oh.

  4. #139
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Can some of you people not read?? No where in my original thread says get rid of your small block and build a big block. I also state that if you want to build a screaming 265-327, do it. It also says that it's your money, build what YOU want.

    I never stated no where in my post that you couldn't make a small cube engine run. If you want to take a 283 and put 12.5:1 domes in it, do it. It will run, but I can do the same thing for the same money to a 383 SMALL BLOCK and make more torque/hp.

    Most people that ask questions about putting a combo together don't have enough experience/knowledge to build a 8500 RPM 283 to out run a 6500 RPM 383.

    This post was directed to the inexperienced engine builder. It was written so that inexperienced engine builders could consider the possibilities available.

    Which engine will last longer?? A 500 hp 283 that needs to spin to 7500 to make it's power or a 500 hp 383 that needs to spin to 6200 RPM to make it's power.

    One hp per cubic inch is a easy goal and will make a long lasting, dependable street engine. The more cubes, the better. In my book, 383 HP beats 283 HP any day.

    LIKE I STATED BEFORE, IT'S YOUR MONEY, BUILD WHAT YOU WANT. Just remember, the more hp per cubic inch you build, the less dependable/streetable the engine becomes.
    Last edited by camaro_fever68; 02-12-2006 at 01:55 AM.
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  5. #140
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Originally posted by gassersrule_196
    In fact it will generally cost more to pull 350 hp out of a 302 than it will to pull that same power out of a 383.

    yeah ok 350 out of a 302 is EASSSSSSY
    yeah ok 350 out of a 383 is EASSSIIIIEEERRRR
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  6. #141
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Originally posted by RJ & CJ
    So, just plain ol' wanting to does not count as a reason in your book? And what about, ohhhh, doing something new, something someone else has not. What about those guys in GN's running faster than many around with thier little turbo 6cyl motors? I believe CI's are the easier route as well, but I also feel that you, as a single individual, have no room to come in here and tell everyone that there are only three pre-set reasons as to why they should build anything below 350CI.

    I personally, feel that you wasted time and money making this thread. You paid for the internet connection to do it with, and you wasted the time writing it. See how opinions differ?

    Big cubes are cool, awesome and convenient, but being closed-minded and one sided is not.
    DID YOU NOT READ THE BOTTOM OF THE THREAD. I'M FAR FROM CLOSED MINDED. I LIKE THE WHINE OF 8500 RPM 283, BUT IT WON'T HOLD UP AS WELL AS A LARGER CUBIC INCH ENGINE AT THE SAME HP LEVEL.

    I AM CURRENTLY BUILDING A 262 V-6 TO MAKE A LOT OF HP BUT THAT'S NOT THE ROUTE I WOULD RECOMMEND TO SOMEONE AS IT WILL NOT HOLD UP. IT WILL BE 14:1 AND RUNNING NITROUS, I KNOW IT WON'T HOLD UP AND I ACCEPT THAT.
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  7. #142
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Originally posted by lt1s10
    for every cu. in. you put under the hood, there is extra cost all the way to the rear wheels to maintain it, and make it work. in other words it cost more to run a big block.
    THE HP PER CUBIC INCH IS WHERE THE COST COMES IN. ONE HP PER CUBIC INCH RESULTS IN A DEPENDABLE, STREETABLE, DAILY DRIVEN VEHICLE THAT WILL LAST FOR A LONG TIME.
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  8. #143
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    A 383 is a big block...Mopar has been building them for years. There are many more good engines in this world besides a chebbie!!!

    One hp per cube is indeed practical. However Mike and I were responding to the responses saying the 500 and 600 cube hi performance big blocks destroy stock drivelines.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  9. #144
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    /
    Last edited by pat mccarthy; 02-12-2006 at 10:11 AM.

  10. #145
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by camaro_fever68
    Can some of you people not read?? No where in my original thread says get rid of your small block and build a big block. I also state that if you want to build a screaming 265-327, do it. It also says that it's your money, build what YOU want.

    I never stated no where in my post that you couldn't make a small cube engine run. If you want to take a 283 and put 12.5:1 domes in it, do it. It will run, but I can do the same thing for the same money to a 383 SMALL BLOCK and make more torque/hp.

    Most people that ask questions about putting a combo together don't have enough experience/knowledge to build a 8500 RPM 283 to out run a 6500 RPM 383.

    This post was directed to the inexperienced engine builder. It was written so that inexperienced engine builders could consider the possibilities available.

    Which engine will last longer?? A 500 hp 283 that needs to spin to 7500 to make it's power or a 500 hp 383 that needs to spin to 6200 RPM to make it's power.

    One hp per cubic inch is a easy goal and will make a long lasting, dependable street engine. The more cubes, the better. In my book, 383 HP beats 283 HP any day.

    LIKE I STATED BEFORE, IT'S YOUR MONEY, BUILD WHAT YOU WANT. Just remember, the more hp per cubic inch you build, the less dependable/streetable the engine becomes.
    This was my point about 30 posts before.I am not sure what happened but we really went to town posting on anything and everything.I tried to tell people about the word cycles but it was lost along time ago.Please help us.

  11. #146
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Good Morning, Erik!!!! how was your nap??? Wanna help me with some flow numbers, gonna start a new thread....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  12. #147
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Originally posted by DennyW
    Maybe everyone has cabin fever, and are board.
    yes i do

  13. #148
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Originally posted by erik erikson
    This was my point about 30 posts before.I am not sure what happened but we really went to town posting on anything and everything.I tried to tell people about the word cycles but it was lost along time ago.Please help us.
    yes i do i think oh well i think some of us wanted to get some thing off are mines yes thank you .i do feel much better now

  14. #149
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Well, it was a long boring Saturday night and now we now that none of us will ever agree on what constitutes the perfect combination!!!! And that's the good news, without different opinions we would never have to "take it to the street" to prove a point!!!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  15. #150
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Thumbs up

     



    Originally posted by Dave Severson
    Well, it was a long boring Saturday night and now we now that none of us will ever agree on what constitutes the perfect combination!!!! And that's the good news, without different opinions we would never have to "take it to the street" to prove a point!!!!!!
    ok you are right, but all i want to do is build them. someone else can loose there driving license

Reply To Thread
Page 10 of 22 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink