Thread: Ragged Edge Pro-Street 406
-
02-13-2006 11:02 PM #1
Ragged Edge Pro-Street 406
I'm building a new engine for my Luv. I put this combo on paper and I think it will fit the bill. This is a 2800lb truck with nothing in it but two racing seats and an aluminum dash with a narrowed 12-bolt and ladder bar suspension. The only street driving it does is to race and terrorize the neighborhood.
4340 Rotating Assembly.
11.6:1 Forged Pistons
Super Victor Intake
Solid Roller 312/322 Ad., 276/284@.050, .630/.630, 104 LSA
210cc AFR Heads, 2.08/1.65
4500 Custom 8" stall, 4.30 gear, 30X13.5X15 E.T. Streets
Comp Pro Magnum Stainless Rockers 1.6in/1.5ex
I plan to run pump gas and turn no more than 7000. I'm wanting deep 10s, but high 9s would be O.K. What yall think?Last edited by camaro_fever68; 02-13-2006 at 11:17 PM.
RAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
02-13-2006 11:11 PM #2
i like the cam why stop at 11.6:1 crank the damn thing up on the cr oh i did not see the pump gas partwhat size of headers ??
-
02-13-2006 11:14 PM #3
Originally posted by pat mccarthy
i like the cam why stop at 11.6:1 crank the damn thing up on the cr oh i did not see the pump gas partwhat size of headers ??
I got 24" of 3" collector, then 3" Flowmasters exiting through 3" pipe right in front the rear tires.Last edited by camaro_fever68; 02-13-2006 at 11:22 PM.
RAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
-
02-13-2006 11:20 PM #4
may be step header 2 to 2 1/8 or the 2 will work how big on the carb think 1000 cfm 13to1 this looks goodLast edited by pat mccarthy; 02-13-2006 at 11:44 PM.
-
02-13-2006 11:24 PM #5
Originally posted by pat mccarthy
may be step header 2 to 2 1/8 or the 2 will work how big on the carbRAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
-
02-13-2006 11:53 PM #6
turn up the cr or turn down the cam a bit ??
-
02-14-2006 02:18 AM #7
Originally posted by pat mccarthy
turn up the cr or turn down the cam a bit ??
I think turning down the cam to a 305 seat timing will be a good move. A little closer to the edge, but a tight quench should help things out.
Here's one: 306/316, 270/278, .630/.630, 104 LSA
I think this one will make more power and torque. I like those Comp hi-tech 420 lobes. They don't beat your valve train up too bad.
I could shorten that Ex. to 312/274 or make it more of a single pattern at 308/270 but running through the mufflers, I may need that extra bit of blowdown.Last edited by camaro_fever68; 02-14-2006 at 03:03 AM.
RAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
-
02-14-2006 04:17 AM #8
Re: Ragged Edge Pro-Street 406
Originally posted by camaro_fever68
I'm building a new engine for my Luv. I put this combo on paper and I think it will fit the bill. This is a 2800lb truck with nothing in it but two racing seats and an aluminum dash with a narrowed 12-bolt and ladder bar suspension. The only street driving it does is to race and terrorize the neighborhood.
4340 Rotating Assembly.
11.6:1 Forged Pistons
Super Victor Intake
Solid Roller 312/322 Ad., 276/284@.050, .630/.630, 104 LSA
210cc AFR Heads, 2.08/1.65
4500 Custom 8" stall, 4.30 gear, 30X13.5X15 E.T. Streets
Comp Pro Magnum Stainless Rockers 1.6in/1.5ex
I plan to run pump gas and turn no more than 7000. I'm wanting deep 10s, but high 9s would be O.K. What yall think?
-
02-14-2006 02:46 PM #9
Re: Re: Ragged Edge Pro-Street 406
Originally posted by erik erikson
I like it, but I would take about 10 degree's off of both sides of the duration to move the powerband down a little bit.I would also add about a 1.5 points to your comp. ratio.RAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
-
02-14-2006 09:32 PM #10
Re: Re: Re: Ragged Edge Pro-Street 406
Originally posted by camaro_fever68
You'll be proud of me Erik, I even got a aftermarket block. What do you think of the cam 306/316 listed above?
-
02-14-2006 09:39 PM #11
I think you may have to consider a higher octane fuel....good combo though.Jim
-
02-14-2006 09:50 PM #12
Originally posted by hambiskit
I think you may have to consider a higher octane fuel....good combo though.
I'm hoping not. I'm playing with the numbers to try to keep my dynamic compression (effective-relative to the valve closing point) below 8.4 which is max for pump gas. I believe with a tight quench and aluminum heads, I may be able to cheat it a little.RAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
-
02-15-2006 08:31 PM #13
Originally posted by camaro_fever68
I'm hoping not. I'm playing with the numbers to try to keep my dynamic compression (effective-relative to the valve closing point) below 8.4 which is max for pump gas. I believe with a tight quench and aluminum heads, I may be able to cheat it a little.
-
02-18-2006 10:44 PM #14
I don't think you wil have a problem with pump gas with that compression and cam setup you have. I am currently running 11.4:1 on a 377 with a smaller cam that you are talking about going to and don't have a knock problem. I was using iron heads and still didn't have a problem now have aluminum heads running timing at 36 degrees no problem. My quench is .045 with flattop pistons.
Where are you located, I see bayou for your location, I assume your located in Louisiana, I'm located in Gonzales.
-
02-18-2006 11:44 PM #15
Originally posted by 73RS
I don't think you wil have a problem with pump gas with that compression and cam setup you have. I am currently running 11.4:1 on a 377 with a smaller cam that you are talking about going to and don't have a knock problem. I was using iron heads and still didn't have a problem now have aluminum heads running timing at 36 degrees no problem. My quench is .045 with flattop pistons.
Where are you located, I see bayou for your location, I assume your located in Louisiana, I'm located in Gonzales.RAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
Thank you Roger. .
Another little bird