Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 305 heads junk?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32
  1. #16
    shevy not heme's Avatar
    shevy not heme is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Columbus
    Car Year, Make, Model: 78 F-100 & 85 S10
    Posts
    206

    #1, Tech., with all due respect, I have done it with a sbc 350,and a Ford 302 (78 model) and there is no,absolutely no,piston noise. Yes it does happen sometimes but your invited to the southside of Columbus to hear for yourself,or if you know anyone here,send them. Also will be glad to tear the heads off to prove it if they will just bring a gasket set for my trouble. Come listen,,,
    #2 Bill,no,no, I didn't say anything about the 305 heads being better than 350 base heads,we would have to see real world dyno results. What I did say was that 305 heads can get my vehicle in the 14's. Thats what I am content with so why put my hard earned money in some fat cats pocket for another set. ALSO, I will argue that with the particular motor combination that I am useing,the higher compression 305 head will out-perform the sick base 350 head. It's not a choice between the two sets that I had anymore,I put the 350 heads on the 305 and will sell it. So, that junk 305 head 'won't' flow enough on 'any' motor to run better than high 14's? That's the impression I get from those that criticize 305 heads. That they won't work over 55 mph,geesh.I know they are not race heads but I also know that they will flow enough to make a 350 run quicker than 14's.Want to come to National Trail Raceway this year and see if they will flow anything or not?
    Hey has that thing gotta Heme in it? No, it's a shevy not heme!

  2. #17
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Originally posted by billlsbird
    DA, hey Tech Inspector, If I put the pistons in UPSIDE DOWN, how much Horse Power will I gain??? zzz
    Bill, I'm not sure what you mean by this, but there is horsepower to be gained by mounting the pistons so that the pin offset is the other way, notwithstanding valve relief problems (arrow on piston pointed to the rear of the block). Hot rodders have been doing it for years.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  3. #18
    billlsbird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3 Window Coupe w/ 392 Hemi
    Posts
    916

    Originally posted by techinspector1
    Bill, I'm not sure what you mean by this, but there is horsepower to be gained by mounting the pistons so that the pin offset is the other way, notwithstanding valve relief problems (arrow on piston pointed to the rear of the block). Hot rodders have been doing it for years.

    .....I was just fooling with Chevy Hemi, by unside down I meant the wrong side up, connectiong rod on the top.... bill

  4. #19
    billlsbird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3 Window Coupe w/ 392 Hemi
    Posts
    916

    Originally posted by shevy not heme
    #1, Tech., with all due respect, I have done it with a sbc 350,and a Ford 302 (78 model) and there is no,absolutely no,piston noise. Yes it does happen sometimes but your invited to the southside of Columbus to hear for yourself,or if you know anyone here,send them. Also will be glad to tear the heads off to prove it if they will just bring a gasket set for my trouble. Come listen,,,
    #2 Bill,no,no, I didn't say anything about the 305 heads being better than 350 base heads,we would have to see real world dyno results. What I did say was that 305 heads can get my vehicle in the 14's. Thats what I am content with so why put my hard earned money in some fat cats pocket for another set. ALSO, I will argue that with the particular motor combination that I am useing,the higher compression 305 head will out-perform the sick base 350 head. It's not a choice between the two sets that I had anymore,I put the 350 heads on the 305 and will sell it. So, that junk 305 head 'won't' flow enough on 'any' motor to run better than high 14's? That's the impression I get from those that criticize 305 heads. That they won't work over 55 mph,geesh.I know they are not race heads but I also know that they will flow enough to make a 350 run quicker than 14's.Want to come to National Trail Raceway this year and see if they will flow anything or not?
    .....hummm, come to the National Trail Raceway??? Can I sleep on your couch??? Carefull, I'm retired, I have the time ..... No, all I was saying was I'd use the 350 heads, but just my opinion. Yes, you can get in the 14's with your 305 heads, especially if your willing to run race gas. With a 2800 pound car you need 235 HP {flywheel} to go 14.5.... That's according to the calculator thats at campenterprises.com... Of course there are a lot variables that this isn't considering. The '84 Camaro that I had with a 305 had {I think, it's been awhile} 195 HP??? or was it 185??? I just liked some of the ideas that you got on milling the 350 heads if you want more compression. Also someone mentioned that the 305 heads didn't 'fit' the bore size of the 350 very well......

  5. #20
    shevy not heme's Avatar
    shevy not heme is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Columbus
    Car Year, Make, Model: 78 F-100 & 85 S10
    Posts
    206

    Bill,Techinspector,other replies, I wasn't bragging up 305 heads, I was defending the rap that they won't work on a mild build up with the right combination of parts,when race heads are not needed. Actually if someone had the money and was building an all out drag car, heads would be at the top of my list, right behind traction/suspension. Thats the place to start,or perhaps the place to put the money.
    I read the posts, I have the mag. subscriptions,I have bought the products,the right ones and the wrong ones at times. All the talk is around high dollar,top of the line products,which I agree with as long as it is the 'right' combination. However,,,there are many of us that don't have the money or the desire to compete with the big boys. Neither am I saying that something like 305 heads is a place to start, not at all. What I am saying is that too many brag up the high dollar products as though they are a cure all that works 100% of the time,whether it be heads,a cool popular name cam-shaft,intake, or what ever. Example? How many guys have put massive cams,heads or a Vic.junior on just to find out that performance has suffered. But how,why, when everyone swears by them? I see that mentality on here sometimes and I was just trying to make a point that unless you want to run a very fast rod, there are many factory products that will run fast at a fraction of the cost. We get so caught up bragging about our high dollar pro-stock cars that we spit on stock eliminator. A $1000 14 sec. brackett motor is just as important as a $50,000+ Pro motor when it comes to keeping the sport alive. Must be nice to have the money you guys have that disagree with me!
    Hey has that thing gotta Heme in it? No, it's a shevy not heme!

  6. #21
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by shevy not heme
    Erik,no, I'm just trying to get some people out of the mentality that says that it has to be bigger to be better. Fact is,these heads have 80,000 miles on them with no cracks or serious problems at all. A good valve job and they will flow plenty good enough to get me in the 14's. Here's my point,if these 'junk' heads will do what I want, then somebody tell me why I should put $600 or more in a better flowing head if I don't need to? Can't get 14's out of 305 heads??? Sure you can. If I can run these junk,disrespectful heads and get a consistant 14 sec. 'bracket' racer why should I feel bad when I send guys trailor loading that have $2000+ heads on 10 & 11 sec. cars?
    And come to think of it,if only the high dollar,fastest cars are the only one's to deserve respect then only top fuel cars should be allowed in the NHRA. But as I recall,I think there are still several classes/catagories. Isn't this what the different classes are all about?
    Our American mentality gets the best of us sometimes. Bigger,better,more expensive, or it is trash? There has been quite a few 14,15,16 sec. brackett cars take the trophy home running 'junk' and we break far less parts.
    Erik,pistons can be installed backwards,add 10hp,& not be noisy.
    Pistons can be installed backwards and add 10 h.p. and not be noisy.Who in the world told you this?Why would you even try this?How or why would it make more h.p.?Here is a thought.The next time I buy a $700 set of buckets for one of my race engines I am going to install them backwards.I think not!!Don't you think the engineers that designed the pistons knew what they where doing?Why even try to second guess them?

  7. #22
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    Originally posted by shevy not heme
    Bill,Techinspector,other replies, I wasn't bragging up 305 heads, I was defending the rap that they won't work on a mild build up with the right combination of parts,when race heads are not needed. Actually if someone had the money and was building an all out drag car, heads would be at the top of my list, right behind traction/suspension. Thats the place to start,or perhaps the place to put the money.
    I read the posts, I have the mag. subscriptions,I have bought the products,the right ones and the wrong ones at times. All the talk is around high dollar,top of the line products,which I agree with as long as it is the 'right' combination. However,,,there are many of us that don't have the money or the desire to compete with the big boys. Neither am I saying that something like 305 heads is a place to start, not at all. What I am saying is that too many brag up the high dollar products as though they are a cure all that works 100% of the time,whether it be heads,a cool popular name cam-shaft,intake, or what ever. Example? How many guys have put massive cams,heads or a Vic.junior on just to find out that performance has suffered. But how,why, when everyone swears by them? I see that mentality on here sometimes and I was just trying to make a point that unless you want to run a very fast rod, there are many factory products that will run fast at a fraction of the cost. We get so caught up bragging about our high dollar pro-stock cars that we spit on stock eliminator. A $1000 14 sec. brackett motor is just as important as a $50,000+ Pro motor when it comes to keeping the sport alive. Must be nice to have the money you guys have that disagree with me!
    if you have 350 heads, they will flow better than the 305 heads, the only benefit of 305 heads are the 58cc chambers, allowing for a higher compression than with a smaller 64cc 350 head, it will give you a slight gain in the low end over a stock 64cc head, because of the diffrence in compression, but they will choke on the high end
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  8. #23
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    eric, please read this blurb from HPC Research.....

    Take a Vice. Most any vice. Install a protective covering over the teeth of the Vice. Push wrist pin out of Piston until 2/3 of the wrist pin is sticking out. Stick the section that's sticking out into the covered jaws of the vice. Snug jaws of Vice around Wrist pin. Place one "leg" of a Carpenter's Square or equivalent on the table where the Vice is. Place the other "leg" of the Square up against the side of the Piston. (Adjust the Piston if necessary). Without moving the Square, Rotate the piston until the OTHER side of the Piston is facing the Square. Note that there is now a noticeable "gap" between the leg of the Square and the Piston. That "gap" is a measure of the "offset". (Actually, the gap is TWICE the wrist pin "offset", and it is left to the Student to prove why this is so.) Oh, so when you rotated the Piston, the Piston moved the Square back a little? No problem. Line the Square up again against the side of the Piston. Then Rotate the piston until the other side of the Piston is facing the Square. NOW, note the "gap". When you see the "gap", that side of the Piston is the one where the Wrist Pin is closest. (Think of the "offset" as increasing or decreasing the angle of the "lever" arm of the Connecting Rod on the Crankshaft. (Some Formula V racers purposely put their VW pistons in backwards- to INCREASE the Lever arm and Torque- piston slap be damned- especially if you win the race.) A Tip o' the Maestro's Hat to Mr. Stoddard for this simple but effective, handy-dandy little homemade tool to measure piston "offset".

    (The diagram didn't come out right, but all it entails is using a carpenter's square stood on edge and up against the skirt with a reference on the table for the square to butt against.)
    Last edited by techinspector1; 02-19-2006 at 08:45 PM.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  9. #24
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Originally posted by firebird77clone
    it's all about flow and chamber size. The chamber size will have the final say on your compression ratio, and the valve size will determine your flow. You want the two-oh-twos valves for max flow, and then some mild grinding to unshroud them ( but don't enlarge the chamber too much ). Pretty basic stuff. Get a 350 build book, there are plenty out there to choose from and they pretty much have all the same information, wheras the 350 is the most common motor to build.

    Peronally, I haven't made the leap to aluminum heads yet, but I can see it in the distant future. Money on your heads is money well spent, provided the chamber size is right for what you want. The heads and cam gotta be matched up, else it will be a dog.
    I will have to disagree with this just slightly. It is not valve size alone that makes a set of heads good or bad, the port size is the other half of it. Look at the L31 Vortech heads with the 1.94" / 1.50" valves. They'll outflow any other pre-'87 Chevy head that has 2.02" / 1.60" valves.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  10. #25
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    I don't get it. If you have allready decided to use 305 heads, then why even bother asking the question????? Use them.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  11. #26
    MadMax's Avatar
    MadMax is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Munich
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1983 Chevy 5,7l G20
    Posts
    213

    And it's not only port size, it's also the port shape that counts, especially in low RPMs, where you need high port velocity.
    305 heads will bolt on and run on a 350. They will starve it out by about 4000 Revs, no matter what cam you put in it.
    Any junkyard 350 head in good shape with a 64cc Chamber will outperform every stock 305 heads (ON A 350!!) and might cost as much as $50.
    Bigger valves aren't always better. In small chamber heads the bigger valves are more shrouded, either you want to get rid of this shrouding or you stay with smaller valves and go for better-flowing seats.
    350 heads are made for 350 engines and 305s for 305s respectively. If there were any gains to be had from using small volume, small chamber heads on a 350, then Chevy-techs would have come up with it.
    I'm not trying to put you off trying things that nobody else has tried before, but there are many things that haven't been tried FOR GOOD REASONS
    Just my opinion,
    Max
    Harharhar...

  12. #27
    halftanked is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Liberty
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1929 ford
    Posts
    504

    I have tried using 305 heads,that's why I said to stop all the pre- ignition you're going to get you will have to open up the chambers to match the bore. I have built claimer engines which have to run stock 2bbl manifolds,and I work more with port velocity than volume. Yes flopping the pistons does increase the TDC squish,and therefore adds power,but at the cost of much more rapid piston and cylinder wear. I save a lot of money by getting engines from the small block modified guys over at the dirt track that can no longer be freshened back to 358 cu in. Lose your idea that everyone else has deeper pockets than you,or likes to piss away pay checks on billet dipsticks guaranteed to make 500 hp. Most of us out here are in hock for a house,and a family to feed.

  13. #28
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Originally posted by techinspector1
    eric, please read this blurb from HPC Research.....

    Take a Vice. Most any vice. Install a protective covering over the teeth of the Vice. Push wrist pin out of Piston until 2/3 of the wrist pin is sticking out. Stick the section that's sticking out into the covered jaws of the vice. Snug jaws of Vice around Wrist pin. Place one "leg" of a Carpenter's Square or equivalent on the table where the Vice is. Place the other "leg" of the Square up against the side of the Piston. (Adjust the Piston if necessary). Without moving the Square, Rotate the piston until the OTHER side of the Piston is facing the Square. Note that there is now a noticeable "gap" between the leg of the Square and the Piston. That "gap" is a measure of the "offset". (Actually, the gap is TWICE the wrist pin "offset", and it is left to the Student to prove why this is so.) Oh, so when you rotated the Piston, the Piston moved the Square back a little? No problem. Line the Square up again against the side of the Piston. Then Rotate the piston until the other side of the Piston is facing the Square. NOW, note the "gap". When you see the "gap", that side of the Piston is the one where the Wrist Pin is closest. (Think of the "offset" as increasing or decreasing the angle of the "lever" arm of the Connecting Rod on the Crankshaft. (Some Formula V racers purposely put their VW pistons in backwards- to INCREASE the Lever arm and Torque- piston slap be damned- especially if you win the race.) A Tip o' the Maestro's Hat to Mr. Stoddard for this simple but effective, handy-dandy little homemade tool to measure piston "offset".

    (The diagram didn't come out right, but all it entails is using a carpenter's square stood on edge and up against the skirt with a reference on the table for the square to butt against.)
    Very interesting article but the dome design dictates what way the piston is installed for my application.This might be possible for a blown or turbo application when a flat top or dish piston is used.You might have to do some extra fly cutting on the piston to make this work.

  14. #29
    HellCaminoKid's Avatar
    HellCaminoKid is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    pittsburgh
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1980 El Camino
    Posts
    96

    interesting post... i have a set of what i believe are 305 heads *checked the casting number and thats what it showed* on my 350 that apparently have some serious machine work done to them, they are 2.02/1.6 valves, 64cc chambers, swapped them with my old set of stock 350 1.94/1.74 76cc heads.... and there is quite the performance jump with my my new heads.... or maybe im dreaming??? lol... but im just a young buck anyhow... and havn't dyno'd the car or raced it yet, but i do beat on it quite a bit and it damn near pulls the front end.... but again... who knows...

  15. #30
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    "it damn near pulls the front end."

    You almost had me convinced about those 305 heads until you said that
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink