Thread: small blocks
-
10-03-2003 12:34 AM #1
small blocks
big question;
chevy small blocks, u can p[ut heads from one on to another, rite.
I was told a set of heads from any other than a 307 will not fit a 307, ayaa
what years did they make the 307, was it worth any thing ?? ?
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
10-03-2003 07:30 AM #2
I believe the production for the 307s went on into the 80's and the engine found it's way into most of the corporate line.
It was chevy's replacement for the 283, and the long stroke gave it good torque for it's size. This was a "bread and butter" engine and no factory preformance versions were offered.
The engine will respond to all the same preformance mods as other SB Chevys, but due to it's long stroke/small bore/small displacement configuration it would be hard to make a real high preformance/high winding engine out of it.
As Richard says any SB head will bolt up. I BELIEVE that 1.94 heads will work with no modifications, but if you decide to go with anything bigger, check for valve to deck interference problems before you start the engine.
One other thing to watch out for is that you get Chevy 307 heads. Oldsmobile also produced a 307 during that era, and those heads are totally different.I've NEVER seen a car come from the factory that couldn't be improved.....
-
10-03-2003 08:01 AM #3
I thought the 307 was an Olds motor....i have seen it in many chevies from early 70s to late and was always told it was an Olds motor...chevy's was the 305, pontiac had the 301. but hey, I'm not a chevy guy, i hate walkinChris
Only the dead fish go with the flow.
-
10-03-2003 10:49 AM #4
anybody have info, or know of any links on this I'v never heard of a 307 by chevy, If there is one I'd like 2 learn more about it?.......................... hay "screamer' could I also get that link to the ford camaro, that you we're typing about the other day w/ the ford 350, when you have time ............. THANKS"Whad'ya want for nuth'N, ..............aaa,rrrrrubber biscuit... ?"
"bad spellers of the word untie ! "
If your wondering how I'm doing I'm > " I'm still pick'N up the shinny stuff and passing open windows "
-
10-03-2003 08:15 PM #5
You don't hear much about the 307 because it wasn't as good as the other motors, so it didn't sell. The major drawback to the 307 is that it had small bores, so small that they can't clear big valve heads. The 302 gives you the same displacement, but has 4" bores to clear big valve heads.
-
10-03-2003 09:21 PM #6
Here's a chart that gives you bores and strokes on many of the "modern" day motors. Note the differences between the Chev 307 and the Olds. http://atlas.spaceports.com/~1320web...s/engines.html
And here's one that is specific to Chevrolet engines with a few more data points. http://www.planet.net.au/~alexst/chev-spec.htmlYour Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon
It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.
Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.
-
10-04-2003 12:39 AM #7
gentlemen .............. I sure appreciate all of your replies, as quick as you all did ............. many thanks to all of you .......
<<<<<<< " I WAS RITE " >>>>>>>>>>
thanks again .......... god bless
chevys4evr
-
10-08-2003 02:01 PM #8
chevy engines link
Here's a link to chevy engines and codes.
www.nastyz28.com/sbcmenu.htmlDum Vivimus Vivamus
-
10-09-2003 11:20 AM #9
the 307 can be bored to 4.00 in. to make a 327. the early models had the 2.000 in. rods. this will made a good engine.
ricky
-
10-09-2003 06:25 PM #10
Originally posted by ricky
the 307 can be bored to 4.00 in. to make a 327. the early models had the 2.000 in. rods. this will made a good engine.
ricky
-
10-10-2003 07:09 AM #11
yes 2.000 rod bearing. i didn't know the 307 crank was the as the 327.
Thank you Roger. .
Another little bird