Thread: is back pres. good 4 NE thing?
-
03-06-2006 10:56 PM #16
Originally posted by Dave Severson
Ok, so now let's throw in a set of 4 into 2 into 1 merge collectors.....I know they help low end torque and top end horsepower, just don't have a clue WHY!!!!!!RAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
03-06-2006 11:02 PM #17
The bigger and shorter the collector, the higher the rpm the engine must turn to come to optimum wave lengths for scavenging effect. Wouldn't that mean you could tune the collector to give the same affect as backpressure?? Maybe a 21/2" instead of 3" would benefit as well without the top end problems of backpressure.RAY
'69 Chevelle--385
'68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
'78 Luv--383
-
03-07-2006 06:48 AM #18
A couple hours of dyno time with a few sets of headers would give you the answer. Considering the cost of dyno time, I doubt you could find significant gain to justify the expense. Without a check on the dyno, most of this is just opinion and guesswork anyhow......
Performance wise, you could probably buy a set of ready made headers and make the car 100 pounds lighter. I've got to build the headers for the Ranchero, might as well try to maximize the performance if you have to custom build, otherwise, I doubt the gain is worth the expense........Last edited by Dave Severson; 03-07-2006 at 06:50 AM.
Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
We may have seen this one before, but it still makes me smile.... This Biker, walked into a biker bar around 9:58 pm. He sat down next to this blonde at the bar and stared up at the TV as the...
the Official CHR joke page duel