Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: is back pres. good 4 NE thing?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 18 of 18
  1. #16
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    Originally posted by Dave Severson
    Ok, so now let's throw in a set of 4 into 2 into 1 merge collectors.....I know they help low end torque and top end horsepower, just don't have a clue WHY!!!!!!
    I think it extends the engine rpm band. Different cylinders come into prime conditions at different times.....
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  2. #17
    camaro_fever68's Avatar
    camaro_fever68 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Bayou
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Camaro 69 Chevelle 78 Chevy Luv
    Posts
    525

    The bigger and shorter the collector, the higher the rpm the engine must turn to come to optimum wave lengths for scavenging effect. Wouldn't that mean you could tune the collector to give the same affect as backpressure?? Maybe a 21/2" instead of 3" would benefit as well without the top end problems of backpressure.
    RAY

    '69 Chevelle--385
    '68 Camaro--Twin Turbo
    '78 Luv--383

  3. #18
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    A couple hours of dyno time with a few sets of headers would give you the answer. Considering the cost of dyno time, I doubt you could find significant gain to justify the expense. Without a check on the dyno, most of this is just opinion and guesswork anyhow......

    Performance wise, you could probably buy a set of ready made headers and make the car 100 pounds lighter. I've got to build the headers for the Ranchero, might as well try to maximize the performance if you have to custom build, otherwise, I doubt the gain is worth the expense........
    Last edited by Dave Severson; 03-07-2006 at 07:50 AM.
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink