Thread: Stroked 283?
-
06-08-2006 05:27 PM #1
Stroked 283?
I have a 283 that has been rebuilt and bored .020" over. I read a 283 bored030 over with a 400 crank would make a 360. what other parts do I need to do this?
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
06-08-2006 05:49 PM #2
where did you read that? 283 is a small journal and a 400 is a large journal, trying to fit a large journal crank in a small journal block is kind of an odd idea, don't think even turning the journals will work for that.You don't know what you've got til it's gone
Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver
1967 Ford Falcon- Sold
1930's styled hand built ratrod project
1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold
-
06-08-2006 05:56 PM #3
what crank should I use then
-
06-08-2006 06:18 PM #4
ither a 283 crank or I guess you could use a small journal 327 crank.You don't know what you've got til it's gone
Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver
1967 Ford Falcon- Sold
1930's styled hand built ratrod project
1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold
-
06-08-2006 06:36 PM #5
could I use 283 con rods w/ a 327 crank
-
06-08-2006 06:41 PM #6
Isn't a 307 a 283 with a 327 crank? You've got all of the parts you need right there.
-
06-08-2006 08:35 PM #7
>I have a 283 that has been rebuilt and bored .020" over. I read a 283 bored030 >over with a 400 crank would make a 360. what other parts do I need to do >this?
Actually, the displacement would be 357.5 cubic inches. The 283 has 2.30" diameter mains and the 400 crank has 2.65" diameter mains, so the crank would have to be machined. Then you'd have to find custom pistons with the correct pin location to get the deck height correct. In short, this isn't an "off the shelf" build. None of this would be as cheap or as reliable as building a 350 and you'd end up with about the same displacement. Why bother?
Bob
Thank you Roger. .
Another little bird