Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Build help for small journal 327
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33
  1. #1
    chevydrivin is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    mccomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 belair: 68 Camaro: 69 F100: 51 M37's
    Posts
    287

    Build help for small journal 327

     



    So I want to build a small journal 327, its got stock steel crank, stock rods with flat tops. Not sure on the pistons in it, they have a big gap just under the oil ring about the size of the oil ring. So the skirt is not attached to the ring section of the piston except on each side by the rod pin bushing. If it does not need boring will these piston work ok and whats the max Compression I could get with these flat tops with small cc heads (?). Or should I bore it and put new pistons to get to a higher compression ratio. Would like to get 400 nto 450 HP out of it but want to be sure its going to hold up to that. Anybody have any recipes for building this motor?

    Pistons? Cam? solid or hyd? Heads? Rods????????????????????????????

  2. #2
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    It seems like every couple of weeks this question comes up.
    First let me say that your expectations of 400 to 450 hp out of a 327 are not practical, not naturally aspirated anyway. Making power is a function of moving air through the motor, the more air you move, the more power you make. The smaller the motor is, the higher you have to rev it to move the air through it. For instance, a 350 bored and stroked to 383 will move 665 cfm at 6,000 rpm's at 100% efficiency. To move the same amount of air through a 327, you'd have to rev it to just over 7,000 rpm's. Now, here's the kicker. In order to make power up to 7,000, you'll need more cam and more compression ratio than you would with the 383 and once you start that, you're moving away from a street motor and into the realm of a race motor. You see, any cam you install in the motor will have an operating range of about 3,500 rpm's. In other words, it will make power from 1,000 to 4,500 rpm's or 1,500 to 5,000 or 2,000 to 5,500 or 2,500 to 6,000 or 3,000 to 6,500 or 3,500 to 7,000 or 4,000 to 7,500, etc., etc. So you see, in order to make power to 7,000 or 7,500 like you'll need to do with a 327, you'll have to give up power in the lower rpm ranges where you need it to be a street motor. Now, if you are only going to race the car, then o.k., no problem. If you will drive it on the street, then you will need steep rear gears and a 5 or 6 speed trans or if running an auto, you'll need a very loose converter and that sometimes is a pain in the ass because the converter won't lock up and will build tremendous heat when driving around town, etc., etc.

    I'll let you digest what I've said here and get back to me with any questions you may have before I continue. Yeah, I have a whole lot more to say depending on what you come up with.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  3. #3
    chevydrivin is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    mccomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 belair: 68 Camaro: 69 F100: 51 M37's
    Posts
    287

    I will only drive the car once and a while, maybe 1,000 miles a year. Not worried about being a street motor, I usually stay on the local roads at 50 to 60 MPH. So I was thinking 11:1 or as high as I could go with ported big valve heads and a decent solid cam. Going with a T400 trans with I don't know maybe 2000 stall???(or I have some powerglides i could use) and 4:11 gears. I am curious on the heads I see 195 cc runners up to 215 or so, is that the amount of porting in the runner? how big of a head can be run on this set up? I was comparing my expectations to the stock 327 that made 365 HP or whatever the HP was on that motor, or was that motor already pushed to the limit? Seems I could built it a little better than that one and at least get to 400HP?

  4. #4
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    How much money do you have to spend? Are aluminum heads in your budget? Is a supercharger or turbo in your budget? Forged pistons? Good rods?

    The 365 was a max effort from the 327 and was an 11:1 motor with a very long cam.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  5. #5
    chevydrivin is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    mccomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 belair: 68 Camaro: 69 F100: 51 M37's
    Posts
    287

    Don't need the thing running for about a year or so, i'll be rebuilding my shop and other projects along the way, not looking at a budget i was going to spread it out over some time get the block work done now and maybe next month buy some rods, maybe two months after that buy a cam setup few months after that buy an intake and carb and so on and so on. Money was one concern on heads I see them fro 1,000 up 1,800, i know I at least need some for $1,000 and would not mind spending an extra 800 if it would help. Heads and trans build would be my last two things to buy before completing it. Still need a little work done to the car before putting the motor in it (68 camaro). I actually have a source to get some turbos but am not impressed with my buddies luck with his twin turbo350 as far as maintanence goes. He had his first set and damaged one of the impellers, he said I could have the other single or both and rebuild the second one but I think I better keep it to non forced induction.

  6. #6
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by chevydrivin
    So I want to build a small journal 327, its got stock steel crank, stock rods with flat tops. Not sure on the pistons in it, they have a big gap just under the oil ring about the size of the oil ring. So the skirt is not attached to the ring section of the piston except on each side by the rod pin bushing. If it does not need boring will these piston work ok and whats the max Compression I could get with these flat tops with small cc heads (?). Or should I bore it and put new pistons to get to a higher compression ratio. Would like to get 400 nto 450 HP out of it but want to be sure its going to hold up to that. Anybody have any recipes for building this motor?

    Pistons? Cam? solid or hyd? Heads? Rods????????????????????????????
    If you have not started on the project yet I would consider building a 383 instead.
    First it will make more torque so you don't need a steep gear or a really loose stall.
    You could build a mild 383 with flat top pistons, good heads and a cam not much larger than a rv cam say 230 at .050 and make 400 hp on pump gas.

  7. #7
    chevydrivin is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    mccomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 belair: 68 Camaro: 69 F100: 51 M37's
    Posts
    287

    Thats what everybody says.... Build a 383 build a 383. I can't see building a 383 when I already have a good 327 block with a good steel crank. Besides that won't the 327 turn a higher RPM than the 383? Just my thoughts, I would rather have a 400 hp 327 rather than a 400 hp 383. Anybody can get 400 hp out of a 383 like you said its easy, flat tops rv cam................
    I do appreciate all the info but I am pretty much set on building the 327 rather than anything else, just wanted some input on if it will hold up to what I am wanting to do with it.
    Fact is I want a loose stall and a steep gear.

  8. #8
    southerner's Avatar
    southerner is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Auckland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 Holden HT
    Posts
    818

    Yep you probably will get 400 HP out of a 327. But at what rpm ? Higher up the rev range. So to put it roughly, you will make 400 with a 327 but you will use more fuel than a 383. Why ? because just by the size of the 383 stroke 3.75 " they produce their power by torque, down in the low revs. But still a high reving 327 sounds great. It's all up to your personal choice. I am building two radically different motors one is a 383 the other is a 302, both chevys, both share the 4.00 " bore. The 383 is to have fun with, the 302 is a resto and I happen to like high rpm shift changes and the car it is in only goes out on a fine weekend when finished.

    PS why not a 350 ? Build them all the time for people, good motor, great motor, but I like experimenting with something else
    Last edited by southerner; 09-28-2006 at 06:28 PM.
    "aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"

    Enzo Ferrari

  9. #9
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    "I think I better keep it to non forced induction."

    O.K., then it's going to have to be some good heads, 11.0:1 minimum c.r. and a long non-hydraulic cam. You'll have to run a tight squish to facilitate pump gas.

    My recipe for such a beast might go something like this.....

    Magnaflux and bore the block 0.030" to 4.030", cut for zero deck
    Magnaflux crank, grind to next undersize if non-concentric, micro-polish
    Eagle rods, I-beam, bushed for full float (H-beam preferred, but expensive)
    SRP forged pistons, pop-up, part #147752, 11.4:1 c.r. with 68 cc heads
    7 qt. oil pan, high volume pump, windage tray, crank scraper
    Air Flow Research 195 heads, 68 cc combustion chambers, chambers altered by AFR to accept SRP piston pop-ups.
    Edelbrock Performer RPM Air Gap intake. There are those who would argue that a Torker II would be a better choice and they may be right. The increased volume that each cylinder would see would help to cushion out the reversion that you will experience with a cam of this size. A Victor Jr. would be too large for this motor in my opinion.
    Holley 0-4779 750 cfm carb.
    Fel-Pro 1003 head gaskets, 0.040" squish with zero deck
    Fel-Pro 1205 intake gaskets
    Fel-Pro 1404 exhaust gaskets
    Isky Z35 solid lifter flat tappet cam, duration 288 @ advertised, 254 @ 0.050" tappet lift, 0.525" valve lift, ground on 108 degree lobe centers. Will rev to 7,500 with Isky engineered kit (highly recommended).
    Roller rockers
    1 3/4" equal length headers into 3" collector, reduced to 2 1/2" pipes to the back. Mufflers of your choice.
    Cold outside air to carb. DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES ALLOW THIS MOTOR TO BREATHE UNDERHOOD AIR.
    HEI distributor recurved by Performance Distributors, Memphis Tennessee. 12 degrees initial, 24 degrees mechanical advance.
    T5 5-spd rebuilt by G-Force for 600 ft.lbs. torque, 4.10 to 4.88 rear gears
    Pedal to the metal and side-step the clutch, shift at 7,200

    Are ya grinnin' yet?

    Installation instructions for AFR heads....
    http://www.airflowresearch.com/sbc_install.php
    Last edited by techinspector1; 09-29-2006 at 11:36 AM.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  10. #10
    chevydrivin is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    mccomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 belair: 68 Camaro: 69 F100: 51 M37's
    Posts
    287

    Exactly the kind of info I am looking for. So the 195 heads are big enough? Are the other ported heads to big? And you think the small journal block will handle it all?

  11. #11
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    AFR 195 heads will support 500 horsepower in a 383 @ 5,500 rpm's. (610 cfm @ 100 % efficiency). A 327 turning 6,440 rpm's passes 610 cfm @ 100 % efficiency. Is there any reason not to think the 327 would make the same power?

    You do raise a good point about the block. I forgot about the main caps. It seems like I've read that they're good to about 400 horsepower or maybe a little better, so a change to Milodon 4-bolt caps in the three center positions would be real good insurance.

    Hey, who knows, I might be full of hooey. Some of you other guys should jump in here and play the devil's advocate for me.....
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  12. #12
    NTFDAY's Avatar
    NTFDAY is online now CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Springfield
    Car Year, Make, Model: '66 Mustang, 76 Corvette
    Posts
    5,374

    Quote Originally Posted by DennyW
    In 1965 they had a 327 with 365 HP, unless it was fuel injected, then it had 375 HP.
    The 375hp/327 was first introduced in '64 in Vettes with FI. The cam was the Duntov 30/30 and Isky came out with a comparable grind. I still have an Isky 30/30 and it will make power to 6000 plus. I've wound it a little tighter than that ,but it's hell on valve springs.
    Summit carries the Isky version part # ISK-200030.
    Ken Thomas
    NoT FaDe AwaY and the music didn't die
    The simplest road is usually the last one sought
    Wild Willie & AA/FA's The greatest show in drag racing

  13. #13
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    And balance everything to within a knats wing on weight!!! Little inch motors will make power but you have to zing them. A quality balance job is critical to longevity on them.... As NTF said, engines are a bit tough on valve springs when they run high (6500 and up) RPM, so plan on some extra maintenance keeping an eye on valve spring tension. Solid lifters seem to cause higher wear rates on the springs then hydraulic cams, roller cams with the radical ramps slam the valves even harder so the valve springs tend to lose tension and or break more frequently. Valve clearance is critical for perfomance and longevity also, follow the cam makers recomendation and check them frequently.... Oh yeah, run a rev limiter for insurance on missed shifts....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  14. #14
    firebird77clone's Avatar
    firebird77clone is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hamilton
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 nomad, 73 charger, 74 vega
    Posts
    3,900

    how 'bout ceramic coated pistons and heads, and put it on the juice?
    ( nitrous )
    .
    Education is expensive. Keep that in mind, and you'll never be terribly upset when a project goes awry.
    EG

  15. #15
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    I like TechInspector's build recommendations. Pay close attention to the fact that he recommends a manual transmission. That 327 is going to build high rpm torque and hp at the expense of bottom end grunt. You would be very unhappy with an automatic tranny behind this combination. There will not be enough bottom end torque to launch it properly, even with a high stall converter.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink