Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: looking for a good power combo (need help)
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27
  1. #1
    79elcamino is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    omaha
    Posts
    11

    looking for a good power combo (need help)

     



    i own gm performance parts crate motor #809-12499529. i have a gm performance intake and an edelbrock performer series 600 cfm carb. my compression ratio is 8.5:1. the heads are 76cc. just wondering if anyone had any good ides on what combinations of parts i should use.

  2. #2
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Well I'm by no means a chebbie expert, but I would think the compression ratio is a bit on the low side to get a lot of help from bolt ons. Not sure how much money you want to spend, but maybe some smaller chamber heads, along with the entire Edelbrock Performer RPM package, heads, cam, intake, and carb. Looks like you probably allready have the right carb. If you have to live with the big chamber heads, then a cam change and some headers may help.....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  3. #3
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by 79elcamino
    i own gm performance parts crate motor #809-12499529. i have a gm performance intake and an edelbrock performer series 600 cfm carb. my compression ratio is 8.5:1. the heads are 76cc. just wondering if anyone had any good ides on what combinations of parts i should use.
    What do you want the motor to do? Did you buy it and then decide that you wanted more power or what? The compression ratio will not support more cam, so be careful, you could make it slower than it is. What's wrong with running it like it is? How much money do you have to spend?
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  4. #4
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    I agree with what has been said. I think a set of Edelbrock aluminum heads and RPM intake would be a good choice, but I do not like their RPM cam as its design makes most of its power in the upper rpm band. A better choice would be a Lunati Voodoo 60102 or 60103, depending what idle quality and performance level you are looking for. These cams are state of the art in cam design right now, and are an improvement over the CompCams XE line according to Harold Brookshire who designed both lines of cams. Just make sure you use the corresponding valve springs for the cam you choose.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  5. #5
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by 79elcamino
    i own gm performance parts crate motor #809-12499529. i have a gm performance intake and an edelbrock performer series 600 cfm carb. my compression ratio is 8.5:1. the heads are 76cc. just wondering if anyone had any good ides on what combinations of parts i should use.
    With that comp. ratio you will need to look at cams that have a duration @ . 050 of 210 or less on the intake side.

  6. #6
    79elcamino is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    omaha
    Posts
    11

    well what id like to do is get an edelbrock rpm airgap intake and a new comp cam camshaft. then the edelbrock performer rpm heads. hopefully getting 9:5.1 comp ratio and running it on regular gas. ive got headers and dual exhaust. but what u really want is what my dyno n my computer is telling me and thats about 410 hp with heads.

  7. #7
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Geez, you don't need an RPM intake. I don't understand you guys who think the motor will be faster with a bigger manifold. All you'll do is kill off the low and mid range with it, where you do 99% of your driving. Now, is you're gonna drag race/street drive with a 383 and rev it to 6,500, then yeah, the motor could take advantage of a bigger manifold.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  8. #8
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    Quote Originally Posted by techinspector1
    Geez, you don't need an RPM intake. I don't understand you guys who think the motor will be faster with a bigger manifold. All you'll do is kill off the low and mid range with it, where you do 99% of your driving. Now, is you're gonna drag race/street drive with a 383 and rev it to 6,500, then yeah, the motor could take advantage of a bigger manifold.

    If we are talking heads, cam, carb and associated parts to make 400+ hp, it would seem an RPM intake would be the logical choice. The Performer is designed to make peak torque at 3500 rpm and lose effectiveness after 5500 rpm. That kind of engine is going to see 6000 rpm with peak torque being in the area of 4000 rpm or so. Why would you want to compromise top end? An RPM dual plane manifold is not going to lose that much low end like a Victor Jr. would. I would just like to know the reasoning behind your response, that's all. No offense intended.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  9. #9
    BigTruckDriver is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    TX
    Car Year, Make, Model: hotrod
    Posts
    1,830

  10. #10
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by 79elcamino
    well what id like to do is get an edelbrock rpm airgap intake and a new comp cam camshaft. then the edelbrock performer rpm heads. hopefully getting 9:5.1 comp ratio and running it on regular gas. ive got headers and dual exhaust. but what u really want is what my dyno n my computer is telling me and thats about 410 hp with heads.
    A 400 hp 350 with comp. ratio of 8.5 to 1 can be done but you will have to buy really good heads and a hyd. roller cam.

  11. #11
    BigTruckDriver is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    TX
    Car Year, Make, Model: hotrod
    Posts
    1,830

    Put a supercharger on it the comp. is pefect.

  12. #12
    79elcamino is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    omaha
    Posts
    11

    no ill buy the heads and get 9:5.1 comp ratio

  13. #13
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by BigTruckDriver
    Put a supercharger on it the comp. is pefect.
    His engine has cast pistons.
    I don't think I would recommend a supercharger.

  14. #14
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    Quote Originally Posted by rumrumm
    If we are talking heads, cam, carb and associated parts to make 400+ hp, it would seem an RPM intake would be the logical choice. The Performer is designed to make peak torque at 3500 rpm and lose effectiveness after 5500 rpm. That kind of engine is going to see 6000 rpm with peak torque being in the area of 4000 rpm or so. Why would you want to compromise top end? An RPM dual plane manifold is not going to lose that much low end like a Victor Jr. would. I would just like to know the reasoning behind your response, that's all. No offense intended.
    No offense taken. You could be right.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  15. #15
    MI2600 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N. Muskegon
    Car Year, Make, Model: 67 Chevy, 72 El Camino, 86 El Camino
    Posts
    138
    I intend to live forever; so far, so good.

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink