-
01-08-2007 05:33 PM #1
build up
what do you guys think of this combination.
355ci-ported vortec heads with ferrea 2.02/1.60 valves
9.8:1 compression forged flat top pistons, eagle 5.7 inch rods
xtreme energy mechanical roller 230/236 dur. with .560 .578 lift
weiand stleath intake with 1 inch carb spacer, harland sharp 1.5-1.6 roller rockers
1 3/4 hooker headers with 2.5 inch exhaust
this combo should make power from 2000-6500rpm's
the car is 3200lbs, T350 with 3000 stall, 4.10 rear gears
hoping this combo will lay down 425hp and put me into the 12's
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
01-08-2007 08:47 PM #2
1.6 rockers on the intake to help the flow differential in the heads and use some rhoads lifters and use a single pattern cam or a dual that favors the intake side,...you have plenty of exaust flow ,no need for more duration on the exaust or 1.6 rockers on exaust,...but the intake valve needs some help with more duration than the exaust and 1.6 rockers.The standard dual pattern cam favors the exaust because flow numbers are usually way below what you have or are stock.In a good head a single pattern cam makes more power ,you have a excellent exaust flow, use a dual pattern cam that is more duration and lift on the intake than the exaust to help the performance of these heads you have.Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)
-
01-09-2007 03:27 AM #3
I like the longer rods, on a Chevy the 6.00 rod will keep the piston at tdc a bit longer. I've never seen any really impressive flow numbers on the Vortec heads, I prefer the aluminum ones. We played with 1.6 rockers for awhile, ran them on the intakes for awhile and on the exhausts for awhile. This was many moons ago before we had access to a dyno so I don't have the numbers to back it up, but seat of the pants feel from the driver said that having the 1.6 rockers on the exhaust helped low and mid range....Probably from better cylinder scavenging??? BTW this was on a circle burner that by rules was forced to run cast iron exhaust manifolds, so things could be different with headers.....Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
01-09-2007 07:21 AM #4
Read what Shawnlee has written.
What he has done is he went back and read your flow numbers.
With an 89 % intake to exhaust ratio you really need to look at symetrical cams,in other words single pattern cams.
A good example that would work for you would be the 286HR by Comp cams.
I would try to run a min. of 10 to 1 for a comp ratio.
I would run a 1.5 ratio rocker arm with a 7/16'th's stud.
Other than that it looks good to me.
Welcome to Club Hot Rod! The premier site for
everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more.
- » Members from all over the US and the world!
- » Help from all over the world for your questions
- » Build logs for you and all members
- » Blogs
- » Image Gallery
- » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts!
YES! I want to register an account for free right now! p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show
Ok gang. It's been awhile. With everything that was going on taking care of my mom's affairs and making a few needed mods to the Healey, it was June before anything really got rolling on this...
My Little Red Muscle Truck