-
02-06-2007 04:09 PM #106
You got that right Dave
How many dependants do you have ?"aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"
Enzo Ferrari
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
02-06-2007 05:11 PM #107
Now by dependants< i would mean how many cars !
Theres a social security form down here that lists number of dependants on the property ? I have allways been tempted to put down 2"aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"
Enzo Ferrari
-
02-06-2007 07:56 PM #108
The voices in my head tell me I don't need counseling, just more time to work on my car.
-
02-07-2007 03:27 PM #109
if your motor had a 2 and 7/8ths inch stroke or the 2 and 5/8's inch stroke you would be hitting 12k to think about it!
Originally Posted by erik erikson
-
02-07-2007 03:32 PM #110
What are they using for a valvetrain and conrods in these engines ?"aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"
Enzo Ferrari
-
02-07-2007 06:30 PM #111
Originally Posted by southerner
-
02-07-2007 09:59 PM #112
Originally Posted by erik erikson
can't really see it, thats why I asked."aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"
Enzo Ferrari
-
02-08-2007 04:22 AM #113
Originally Posted by southerner
1.Jessel shaft mount rockers $1,000.The good ones.
2.Isky Tool room or Manley NexTek valve springs $400.
3.Titanium valves $1,500.
4.Jessel "hand built" roller lifters.last I checked where $1,850.
5.a superlight crank $2,500.
6.BME alu.rods $1,000.
These are all catalog price's.
For a grand total of $6,750.
Before you add pistons, rings,bearings,balancing etc.
This why someone is really full of BS.
-
02-08-2007 10:52 AM #114
Yep, I can see that those are real world costings, thats why a lot of us that are on a limited budget dont try it !!!! When something lets go "as they do", the heartbreak would be to much.
Mind you i was looking at an article on the net, apparrantly chevy performance did abuild up of a 302 with a blower in 95 revs were reasonably at 6750. So obviously the interest is there.
Just google it and type 302 supercharged in the search.
Eric, I tried out the chat room in the sister site, works well, just got to get a handle on it. You want to try it at some stage.....but and hour seems to go by real fast, like in 10 minutes"aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"
Enzo Ferrari
-
02-08-2007 06:50 PM #115
erik its not b/s the guy has it, hes about 60 hes had the car for YEARS and it is loaded full of good stuff. i will get pictures for you.
-
02-08-2007 08:19 PM #116
Originally Posted by gassersrule_196
Until you build an engine like this don't even bother trying to explain it to me.
You really have no idea what it takes to attempt an engine build like this.
In the late 60's and early 70's they did not have the ability to turn an engine this tight.
-
02-08-2007 08:24 PM #117
I think it was 8500 tops back then wasn't it, I am over in the chatroom now"aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"
Enzo Ferrari
-
02-08-2007 09:41 PM #118
who said it was back then? i am talking now.
-
02-09-2007 09:04 AM #119
Burty,
Clearly you MUST build a 12,000rpm 302!! Nuff said.
George
-
02-09-2007 11:59 AM #120
12,000 Rpm Is For Fags. I Won't Ride In A Vehicle That Doesn't Spin To 18,000 Rpm's. Off I Go Too Drink Kerosene With Koolaid And Adjust My Valves For Another 18,000 Rpm Drive. That Is All........
Welcome to Club Hot Rod! The premier site for
everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more.
- » Members from all over the US and the world!
- » Help from all over the world for your questions
- » Build logs for you and all members
- » Blogs
- » Image Gallery
- » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts!
YES! I want to register an account for free right now! p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show
Thanks! It's the most metal forming I've done. I was wishing I had an English wheel and a planishing hammer.
Stude M5 build