Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 355 engine desktop dyno needed
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    BigRedTrucker is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    71

    355 engine desktop dyno needed

     



    Ok here are the specs:

    Vortec heads
    Edelbrock Performer Vortec intake
    Performer 1400 carb (600 cfm carter style)
    350 four bolt main, 1-piece rear main seal
    Scat 4340 rods stock replacement forged i-beam
    Speed pro pistons flat top, 2 vavle relief .030 over
    cam, crane cams powermax lift: .427"/.454", duration 260*/272*
    stock stamped rockers that came w/ the vortecs
    accel distributor with new module/coil
    decent ignition wires
    stock crank
    street dampr
    stock exhaust manifold, although might get headers

    I am hoping to get around 300-350 horse and hopefully 350-400ft lbs for a daily driver truck that will see ocassional towing. I'd like to use less than 89 octane and get at least 150-200k miles with decent fuel mileage. I'd also like it to be somewhat reasonable $$-wise to build. Thanks for your help! Oh yeah, the vortecs are good to use right? Buddy of mine says he built a customer's engine with them and said the sound was great but throttle response kinda sucked.

    links:

    pistons: http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...5718_-1_128064

    cam: http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...44656_-1_26000

    looks almost like combo 35: http://www.ryanscarpage.50megs.com/combos5.html

  2. #2
    viking's Avatar
    viking is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Branson area
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 T, 53 FLH , 66 C-10 454, 03 CVPI
    Posts
    968

    This is what I get using the Vortec L31 64cc head, hyd lifters, open headers
    Attached Images
    Objects in the mirror are losing

  3. #3
    BigRedTrucker is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    71

    ok, thank you. Not to sound dumb, but I thought vortecs were like 72ccs? If I don't have open headers and since there'll be a load, would that bring everything down cuz right now I'm looking at about 311 max hp and 318 max torque since valves will float at 5500 rpm, right? Sorry, just trying to figure out how to read this. Hmmmm, that's not a lot of torque. Thanks!

    edit: i guess the vortec heads are 64cc. . . . .wonder where I got 72?. . . .
    Last edited by BigRedTrucker; 01-24-2007 at 12:46 AM.

  4. #4
    viking's Avatar
    viking is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Branson area
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 T, 53 FLH , 66 C-10 454, 03 CVPI
    Posts
    968

    Got the head specks here


    http://www.purplesagetradingpost.com...20Vortec%20855


    Do you know your head casting number ?
    Last edited by viking; 01-24-2007 at 12:49 AM.
    Objects in the mirror are losing

  5. #5
    BigRedTrucker is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    71

    They are sitting on the floor of my truck, they did come off a truck motor, so they prolly are 64cc. I'd check the casting but I've got one arm in a cast cuz of a broken elbow.

  6. #6
    viking's Avatar
    viking is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Branson area
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 T, 53 FLH , 66 C-10 454, 03 CVPI
    Posts
    968

    O.K. keep us posted on the build
    Objects in the mirror are losing

  7. #7
    BigRedTrucker is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    71

    will do. . . . .I'm just concerned with those torque numbers. . . . engine efficiency seems to come alive at 6k also. . . .would a cam change that? change the torque that is.

  8. #8
    viking's Avatar
    viking is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Branson area
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 T, 53 FLH , 66 C-10 454, 03 CVPI
    Posts
    968

    Hey Red, I looked over my cam input figures and found a decimal in the wrong place,

    Here is the corrected dyno sim, flywheel, not rear wheel,

    No more late night input for me.
    Attached Images
    Objects in the mirror are losing

  9. #9
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    [QUOTE=viking]Hey Red, I looked over my cam input figures and found a decimal in the wrong place,

    Here is the corrected dyno sim, flywheel, not rear wheel,

    No more late night input for me. [/QUO I think you might have done more than put a decimal in the wrong place.
    The cam specs. are .427/.454 duration at .050 is 204/216.
    There is no way this cam is making 437 hp at 6,000 rpms.
    Crane says it has a 1,500-4,500 rpm power band.
    I would guess it would make max. hp. around 4,200 rpms and not 6,000 rpms.
    He would be darn lucky to get 337 hp out of it let alone 437.
    Like I said before if you put crap in for information you will get crap out.

  10. #10
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    here's what I got. EA 3 is probably the best software, dyno 2000 is ok, it's off +- 50 HP or so, sometimes. dyno 2000 is what I have
    Attached Images
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  11. #11
    viking's Avatar
    viking is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Branson area
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 T, 53 FLH , 66 C-10 454, 03 CVPI
    Posts
    968

    [QUOTE=erik erikson]
    Quote Originally Posted by viking
    Hey Red, I looked over my cam input figures and found a decimal in the wrong place,

    Here is the corrected dyno sim, flywheel, not rear wheel,

    No more late night input for me. [/QUO I think you might have done more than put a decimal in the wrong place.
    The cam specs. are .427/.454 duration at .050 is 204/216.
    There is no way this cam is making 437 hp at 6,000 rpms.
    Crane says it has a 1,500-4,500 rpm power band.
    I would guess it would make max. hp. around 4,200 rpms and not 6,000 rpms.
    He would be darn lucky to get 337 hp out of it let alone 437.
    Like I said before if you put crap in for information you will get crap out.

    Yeah it look way high to me also, but I triple checked the input , I wish some one had some engine specks and REAL flywheel dyno numbers that it produced so I could compare and know once and for all if it's good/close/junk, you got any from a engine dyno Erik ?
    Objects in the mirror are losing

  12. #12
    BigRedTrucker is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    71

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    Like I said before if you put crap in for information you will get crap out.
    Did not mean to cause an argument. Sounds like my engine is tearing this forum apart!

    Anybody know where to get dyno software locally? I need to change the cam (may run overdrive) to one with a power range in a lower RPM and pistons, since these are 9.73 and that will not allow 87-89 octane. Thanks guys!

  13. #13
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by BigRedTrucker
    Did not mean to cause an argument. Sounds like my engine is tearing this forum apart!

    Anybody know where to get dyno software locally? I need to change the cam (may run overdrive) to one with a power range in a lower RPM and pistons, since these are 9.73 and that will not allow 87-89 octane. Thanks guys!
    If you want a "baseline" hp reading try www.proracingsim.com
    They also have software on picking the right cam also.
    Don't be arfaid to get up your check book it does not come cheap.

  14. #14
    viking's Avatar
    viking is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Branson area
    Car Year, Make, Model: 23 T, 53 FLH , 66 C-10 454, 03 CVPI
    Posts
    968

    Quote Originally Posted by BigRedTrucker
    Did not mean to cause an argument. Sounds like my engine is tearing this forum apart!

    Anybody know where to get dyno software locally? I need to change the cam (may run overdrive) to one with a power range in a lower RPM and pistons, since these are 9.73 and that will not allow 87-89 octane. Thanks guys!

    No argument issues here, if this software can be used reliably I'll use it, if not it was a fun program to play with for awhile and I'll make a overpriced coaster out of it.

    The basic what will/won't work for most engines have already been figured out, whats left is the fine tweeks IMHO.

    For most I'd guess it comes down to $$$, how fast can you afford to go, and where best to spend it.
    Objects in the mirror are losing

  15. #15
    81 cabellero's Avatar
    81 cabellero is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    delta, BC Canada
    Car Year, Make, Model: 81 gmc cabellero diablo
    Posts
    104

    good....fast.....cheap

    pick two cause all three can never be used at the same time.
    old habits die hard

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink