Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Dyno Guys
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 39
  1. #1
    Hopper111 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Lawton/Ft. Sill, OK
    Car Year, Make, Model: '87 Chev Silverado/'72 Elky
    Posts
    483

    Dyno Guys

     



    I'm 2 days away from having my short block together for the el camino. I'm getting really antsy to see what she'll do at full strength.

    For a little sneak peak, could someone with a good version of desktop dyno tell me what you need to know in order to give me a fairly accurate hp/tq rating. Thanks a bunch.

  2. #2
    gschuld is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wilmington
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 firebird, 66 Amc Rebel convertible
    Posts
    69

    motor type, cubic inches, cylinder head type, valve sizes, port work?, exhaust type, header size, with/without mufflers, cam lifter type, cam lift, duration, intake type, carb type and size, compression ratio. That would be the basics for a start.

    George

  3. #3
    Hopper111 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Lawton/Ft. Sill, OK
    Car Year, Make, Model: '87 Chev Silverado/'72 Elky
    Posts
    483

    Motor Type: Small block Chevy
    Cubic Inches: 377 CID
    Cylinder Head: '441 Casting Iron heads 76cc Combustion Chambers
    Valves: 2.02/1.60
    Exhaust: 3 inch 'X' pipe
    Headers: Yes, not sure on size though.
    Mufflers: Yes, 40 series flowmaster
    Cam: Solid Roller, ".567/".567 int/exh 242/242@.050
    Intake: Edelbrock Torker II Intake
    Carb Type: Not sure, possibly looking at 750cfm holly double pumper or demon
    Compression Ratio: estimated @ 10:1

    The pistons are Probe forged flat top. The rods are forged 'H' beam. The crank is Scat cast steel. Block is 4 bolt 400 SBC. Cam is Chet Herbert Performance. Valve train is Renegade Racing. Cam is on a 110 degree lobe center.

    I appreciate anyone who will take the time to help me out here. If you need anymore information, just ask. I will provide

  4. #4
    facemelter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Mankato
    Posts
    118

    Quote Originally Posted by Hopper111
    Motor Type: Small block Chevy
    Cubic Inches: 377 CID
    Cylinder Head: '441 Casting Iron heads 76cc Combustion Chambers
    Valves: 2.02/1.60
    Exhaust: 3 inch 'X' pipe
    Headers: Yes, not sure on size though.
    Mufflers: Yes, 40 series flowmaster
    Cam: Solid Roller, ".567/".567 int/exh 242/242@.050
    Intake: Edelbrock Torker II Intake
    Carb Type: Not sure, possibly looking at 750cfm holly double pumper or demon
    Compression Ratio: estimated @ 10:1

    The pistons are Probe forged flat top. The rods are forged 'H' beam. The crank is Scat cast steel. Block is 4 bolt 400 SBC. Cam is Chet Herbert Performance. Valve train is Renegade Racing. Cam is on a 110 degree lobe center.

    I appreciate anyone who will take the time to help me out here. If you need anymore information, just ask. I will provide
    sounds to me like its gonna be quite the monster

  5. #5
    skids72's Avatar
    skids72 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Lafayette
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Firebird 439 BBC
    Posts
    745

    Hopper, here's what I got. I had to make a few assumptions (intake centerline =106*, large tube headers, 4" bore, 3.75" stroke = small bore 383?).

    381HP @5000, 479lbft @ 2000-2500

    Seems a solid roller might be overkill for low revs Could probably get as good performance out of a good hydraulic...
    Attached Images

  6. #6
    rumrumm's Avatar
    rumrumm is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Macomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3W Coupe, 383 sbc
    Posts
    1,593

    Your heads are holding you back. With that much cam, you need a set of good breathing aluminum heads like AFR or Brodix to make your combination work to its full potential.


    Lynn
    '32 3W

    There's no 12 step program for stupid!

    http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson

  7. #7
    Hopper111 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Lawton/Ft. Sill, OK
    Car Year, Make, Model: '87 Chev Silverado/'72 Elky
    Posts
    483

    I'm sorry, i did not specify bore and stroke. It's a 4.155 bore x 3.5 stroke

    Destroked 400 SBC. The cam is a 110* lobe center.

    What would the numbers be if i swapped over to a good set of AFR or Brodix heads?

  8. #8
    gschuld is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wilmington
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 firebird, 66 Amc Rebel convertible
    Posts
    69

    I used destop dyno 2000 and got very different results for some reason.
    I also had to try to fit your specs into the program parameters(that leave a bit to be desired). I used 4.155 bore, 3.5 stroke, solid roller .567 lift, 296 int dur, 302 exh dur, 106 lobe centers, 87 deg valve overlap, large tube headers w/ mufflers, "low performance, pocket ported" heads with 2.02, 1.60 valves. 10.1 comp. etc, etc.

    here is what I got...

    rpm hp tq

    2000 106 279
    3000 186 326
    4000 307 403
    5000 423 444
    5500 457 436
    6000 477 418
    6500 483 390
    7000 470 353
    7500 454 318

    Big difference...I went back and checked to see if I missed something obvious. Didn't see anything. Then again I'm known for not being able to see the milk in the fridge! For what I put in, that's what DD2000 spit out. For the motors sake, I sure how my numbers are closer!!!

    Hope this brightens your day a bit.

    Can someone else out there give it a run to get a third opinion...it shouldn't be that different! I'm probably the one screwing it up here...sniffed too much race gas...or was it glue...what's my name again?

    For the record, I do agree that your heads would represent your most obvious bottleneck in the power department. I suspect a reasonable amount of power would be gained from a nice set of aluminum castings. Plus the aluminum would help for keeping detonation at bay. I have a 383 sbc with 12.5:1 comp and fully ported big valve 461 fuelie heads and although they won't flow as well as the newer good stuff, I like running the vintage stuff and it runs pretty hard at the track considering the heads are older than I am!

    My motor isn't that different than yours, aside from the small displacement difference, the biggest difference is the comperssion. I run a solid flat tappet .570 lift older custom cam. Team G intake, modified 750DP carb, 1 7/8 headers, full 3" exhaust with mufflers. Even has an old gear drive timing for effect. Never dynoed it, but in a 3400lb 69 Firebird with 255/60/15 worn out radial t/a actual STREET tires (no traction whatsoever) having to baby it off the line(1.95 60ft.) and it had no problem finishing at a consistent 114-115mph, 12.2sec fighting for traction HARD for the first 1/8th.

    My heads should flow a bit better, my higher compression is certainly helping me a good bit, maybe 5-10% or so. Your cam is probably a better profile than my 10 year old solid flat tappet stick. I'd ballpark guess that my motor shouldn't be more than 10-15% or so stronger than yours.

    George

  9. #9
    gschuld is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wilmington
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 firebird, 66 Amc Rebel convertible
    Posts
    69

    I just used the same perameters as before and just changed the head type to flow around 280 intake or so, and I came up with a power boost of...

    hp 483 to 527 at 6500
    tq 444 to 477 at 5000

    As usual, this is FAR from acurate, just ballpark at best!

    George

  10. #10
    76GMC1500 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,176

    We're running people's combos in Desktop Dynos? Ooh, ooh! Run mine.

    Motor Type: Small block Chevy
    Cubic Inches: CID 353
    Bore/Stroke: 4.02/3.48
    Cylinder Head: L31 Vortec Heads
    Valves: 1.94/1.5
    Exhaust: 2.5-2.25" H-pipe
    Headers: Yes, 1 5/8ths primaries and 2.5" collectors.
    Mufflers: Yes, Turbo style, 2.25" in and out
    Cam: Hydraulic Flat, .447"/.454" int/exh 212/218@.050 110LSA 106 Centerline Comp XE256H
    Intake: Edelbrock Performer Vortec
    Carb Type: Qjet, 750CFM
    Compression Ratio: 9.25:1

  11. #11
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    Quote Originally Posted by 76GMC1500
    We're running people's combos in Desktop Dynos? Ooh, ooh! Run mine.

    Motor Type: Small block Chevy
    Cubic Inches: CID 353
    Bore/Stroke: 4.02/3.48
    Cylinder Head: L31 Vortec Heads
    Valves: 1.94/1.5
    Exhaust: 2.5-2.25" H-pipe
    Headers: Yes, 1 5/8ths primaries and 2.5" collectors.
    Mufflers: Yes, Turbo style, 2.25" in and out
    Cam: Hydraulic Flat, .447"/.454" int/exh 212/218@.050 110LSA 106 Centerline Comp XE256H
    Intake: Edelbrock Performer Vortec
    Carb Type: Qjet, 750CFM
    Compression Ratio: 9.25:1
    304 HP @ 4k, 384 Ft/LBS @3.5k Desktop dyno 2000 figures
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  12. #12
    76GMC1500 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,176

    Cool, thanks. The time sheets seem to confirm those numbers.

  13. #13
    kitz's Avatar
    kitz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Roadster, BBC
    Posts
    962

    I get 339 hp at 5,000 rpm, 443 lb-ft torque at 2,500 rpm .............

    Kitz
    Jon Kitzmiller, MSME, PhD EE, 32 Ford Hiboy Roadster, Cornhusker frame, Heidts IFS/IRS, 3.50 Posi, Lone Star body, Lone Star/Kitz internal frame, ZZ502/550, TH400

  14. #14
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by Hopper111
    Motor Type: Small block Chevy
    Cubic Inches: 377 CID
    Cylinder Head: '441 Casting Iron heads 76cc Combustion Chambers
    Valves: 2.02/1.60
    Exhaust: 3 inch 'X' pipe
    Headers: Yes, not sure on size though.
    Mufflers: Yes, 40 series flowmaster
    Cam: Solid Roller, ".567/".567 int/exh 242/242@.050
    Intake: Edelbrock Torker II Intake
    Carb Type: Not sure, possibly looking at 750cfm holly double pumper or demon
    Compression Ratio: estimated @ 10:1

    The pistons are Probe forged flat top. The rods are forged 'H' beam. The crank is Scat cast steel. Block is 4 bolt 400 SBC. Cam is Chet Herbert Performance. Valve train is Renegade Racing. Cam is on a 110 degree lobe center.

    I appreciate anyone who will take the time to help me out here. If you need anymore information, just ask. I will provide
    First of all you don't have enough compression to run that cam.
    Second your heads are to small.
    Again if you want to run the 377 you will have to gear the $hit out of it to get it to work and run a really loose stall.
    Ask any one who runs a dirt mod. and they will tell you a 377 is great for a "dry slick" track because it will take a lot of the low end torque away.
    Then ask them for a "tacky" track what they would run and they will say a 383/406.

  15. #15
    Hopper111 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Lawton/Ft. Sill, OK
    Car Year, Make, Model: '87 Chev Silverado/'72 Elky
    Posts
    483

    cool, thanks guys. i was counting that with my choked up cast iron heads i'd make somewhere between 450-500 hp. This has been a ride. For $2500 I've managed to put together a complete engine and valve train minus the head castings to put the valve train into that is capable of 500+ HP and a healthy shot of nitrous. Not bad in my book. Granted, to make this puppy into a fire breather monster, you'd need to put some money into a good pair of cylinder head castings. However, I have everything needed to assemble the cylinder heads/valvetrain. Not bad. Just wish i was still into the racing scene and still needed this motor

    I gave the specs to those particular cylinder heads because they are the only pair that I have. The thought crossed my mind to use them, but i knew that they wouldn't breathe well enough for that cam and the chambers would be too big to really let that cam rip. I just thought that if the motor made decent numbers with those old heads, it would make great numbers with a good pair of heads.

    Also thinking of selling this motor to pay for my books and tuition for my college classes. What would be a fair price for this motor? (I have everything except carburetor, distributor, and cylinder heads. The valve train and shortblock are complete)
    Last edited by Hopper111; 02-07-2007 at 06:40 PM.

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink