Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Max torque, small CID?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Wild Turkey is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Elizabethtown
    Car Year, Make, Model: 49 Willys Overland
    Posts
    19

    Max torque, small CID?

     



    I'm wanting to build a SBC for max low-end torque for trailer towing. (Grew up driving John Deere's and a 292).

    So how would it work to put a 400 crank in a 305 or 307? Would one work better than other?

    Since I'm only looking for low rpm would the heads be a limiting factor?

    The other option is a 366 TD BB

    Thanks for any help.

  2. #2
    gschuld is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wilmington
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 firebird, 66 Amc Rebel convertible
    Posts
    69

    If it's low end torque your after, why not just put a 400 crank in a 400 block. As far as I'm concerned, in general and especially for a low end torque motor it would be most convenient and economical to start with as many cubes as possible. Good 400 blocks/engines are not that hard to find, and if you are not planning to spin a grunt motor past 5500 rpm or so, the complete stock internals(short rods and all) minus a good set of pistons would hold up just fine. Lots of low end fun! I run a 406 and love it. Big block grunt, small block weight!

    Just a thought

  3. #3
    76GMC1500 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,176

    Torque is more a function of displacement than stroke, this is a major misunderstanding. The bigger engine will always make more torque.

  4. #4
    chevydrivin is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    mccomb
    Car Year, Make, Model: 55 belair: 68 Camaro: 69 F100: 51 M37's
    Posts
    287

    What are you towing and what is the vehicle? A small cube engine with a lot of torque might tow well but get crapie fuel mileage.

  5. #5
    southerner's Avatar
    southerner is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Auckland
    Car Year, Make, Model: 69 Holden HT
    Posts
    818

    forget about the smal bore small block chevies, stick with the 4.00 inch bore or bigger 4.128. Or as you said you could go for a 366 tall deck truck block, BUT...... they are heavy and good for keeping your front wheels on the ground.
    "aerodynamics are for people who cant build engines"

    Enzo Ferrari

  6. #6
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    i see you say a 366 but you can find a 427 tall deck ?you can get it out to 525 easy with some work but it may not fit in to what you have easy or a 454 /496 with low buck parts

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink