Thread: 350 build up
-
04-04-2007 03:27 PM #16
Focus on parts that put the rpm peak and the torque peak specs very close together and focus on good port velocity and low rpm torque production on a street based car and you have all you want.
Matching the components to all the same specs will insure you have a very responsive motor.....substitute on part for a mismatched high rpm part thinking this will get that little extra and it will cost you ........with the right parts you can wind it up in the rpms and still have a good street motor ,you just will not be makin any power or going any faster at higher rpms unless you use non street oriented parts ,which is what you do not want.Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
04-04-2007 07:37 PM #17
Originally Posted by #1firebird
Cubic inches and rpm's.
I am sure you have heard an engine is an "air pump".
You can only use so much fuel and air.
To build a 500 hp 383 you need around 195 cc's in port volume or around 280 cfm.
Look at hyd. roller cams that are around 240 degree's of duration at .050 and .550 lift.
You also need to keep your comp. ratio at 10.5 to 1.
-
04-04-2007 07:52 PM #18
Build for low and mid RPM torque and leave the big horsepower numbers for the drag strip high revvers. As Eric suggested, that 500 horse stroker is probably well over 500 ft lbs. torque, and I would imagine it's making peak torque somewhere between 4500 to 6000 RPM!!!! Built right and maintained properly it will perform excellent and last a long time!!!!Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
04-05-2007 11:19 AM #19
Originally Posted by 69elkoNo body messes with the Night Rider
-
04-05-2007 11:24 AM #20
do you think a stock 350 bottom end with a set of world 58cc heads torker 2 intake with matching cam and 750 edelbrock would work fine? if so how do you think it would run, bottom end torque and top end?No body messes with the Night Rider
-
04-05-2007 05:32 PM #21
Why do you want such small combustion chambers? Even with large dished pistons, it's difficult to get under 9.5:1 with 64cc heads. You want to stay under 10:1 or 10.5:1 even if you run a big cam if you have any aspirations of running pump gas. 64cc heads are the way to go, not smaller.
-
04-05-2007 09:26 PM #22
Originally Posted by 76GMC1500
-
04-05-2007 10:24 PM #23
Originally Posted by #1firebird
The engine build I posted earlier would give you a good all around engine, one that would be good on the street or strip, on pump gas, and would do 12 second quarters in a medium sized car with good traction and the right gearing and stall converter.
-
04-09-2007 11:07 AM #24
because i dont want a good all around everyday engineNo body messes with the Night Rider
I wanted to complain about this NZ slang business, but I see it was resolved before it mattered. LOL..
the Official CHR joke page duel