Thread: 383 Stroker Build
-
05-02-2007 06:10 PM #1
383 Stroker Build-desktop dyno????
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Last edited by FFM; 09-25-2008 at 12:15 AM.
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
05-02-2007 07:44 PM #2
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Last edited by FFM; 09-25-2008 at 12:14 AM.
-
05-02-2007 08:26 PM #3
if you can gain techinspector's attention, he has a link to a killer car page that has hundreds of proven engine combinations. I used to have it but I misplaced it somewhere in my harddrive and now i can't find it.
-
05-02-2007 08:41 PM #4
Originally Posted by FFM
I would say you are right on the edge for going to a single plane intake like a Victor intake.
To cross over to the 500 hp area.
I would run a hyd. roller cam.
I would try a Comp. cam XR288HR or a Crane part number 118571.
With those heads and either one of the cams listed above I would try and run 10.5 to 1 comp. ratio.
If you can't run that much comp. ratio take about five degree's of duration off the cam at .050.
Yes the engine will run on 92 pump gas and about 36 degree's total timing.
-
05-03-2007 12:21 AM #5
I didn't have anything on your intake, I used the Performer RPM instead - should be close.
I think you are going to have to 'give' somewhere. With a sub 500 lift hydraulic camshaft and dual plane intake, you will be very hard pressed to get the 450 to 500 hp range.
Depending upon how you plan on using the car, the combo as is has a tremendous amount of torque. If you see more street driving than track time, thats what you are looking for anyways.
-
05-03-2007 07:50 AM #6
On the screen above - curious about the deck height of 9.000????
Unless the program units are actually factions of an inch?Last edited by SBC; 05-03-2007 at 07:53 AM.
There is no limit to what a man can do . . . if he doesn't mind who gets the credit. (Ronald Reagan)
-
05-03-2007 08:54 AM #7
Originally Posted by FFMLast edited by rumrumm; 05-03-2007 at 08:57 AM.
Lynn
'32 3W
There's no 12 step program for stupid!
http://photo.net/photos/Lynn%20Johanson
-
05-03-2007 09:31 AM #8
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Last edited by FFM; 09-25-2008 at 12:14 AM.
-
05-03-2007 09:06 PM #9
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Last edited by FFM; 09-25-2008 at 12:14 AM.
-
05-04-2007 12:37 PM #10
In my opinion, you're starting with the best heads money can buy and they're the correct size (cubic inches times 1/2 for intake runner size, street motor).
AFR shows five builds on their dyno website. Check 'em out.......
http://www.airflowresearch.com/chevy_dyno.phpPLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.
-
05-04-2007 03:31 PM #11
Originally Posted by techinspector1
Over 450 lbs. of torque at 2,500 rpm's.
Over 500 hp at 5,500 rpm's.
All this on pump gas and less than 10 to 1 for a comp. ratio.
This is what ever sbc guy needs.
This is as close to perfect for a street rod or muscle as you will ever get I.M.O.
-
05-04-2007 09:01 PM #12
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Last edited by FFM; 09-25-2008 at 12:14 AM.
-
05-05-2007 06:38 AM #13
Originally Posted by FFM
To be safe I would say it would add about $550 to the build price if you figure the other hyd. cam and lifters at $140 and you would need a better valve springs also.
I run a small or reduced base circle cam in any of the 383's I build.
The 280 would be the largest hyd. cam I would run in a sbc. with the removal of zinc from todays oils.
I have customers that run 7.00's in the 1/8 mile out of a sbc. with a hyd. roller cam and some even drive them to the track.
If I am building a max. effort 383 sbc. for the streets the most hp out of a hyd. cam I would even try for is around 1.1 to 1.2 hp per cubic inch.
After that I would look at hyd. roller's or mech. rollers.
I wanted to complain about this NZ slang business, but I see it was resolved before it mattered. LOL..
the Official CHR joke page duel