Thread: roller cam vs hydralic
-
06-02-2007 04:29 PM #1
roller cam vs hydralic
finally getting to the stage in my build up. it's time to pick a cam I have 400 block and it is preparing to be bored +40 I have KB flat top pistons 7cc dish 10:1 with the 76cc 441s heads block has been zero decked. I guess i'll have to run premium or race gas till i can offord aluminum heads this is the question i was thinking on going with the comp Xtreme energy 268 or 274 hydralic cam but i put off the build up long enough to have money for a roller cam my cousin switched to a roller in his 350 and he's says it's a 30-70 hp out the box his 1st cam wore out without a whole lot of use and i hear rollers last longer do to the less friction i already have 1.5 roller rockers and so on and i have to get springs and retainers either way it goes so is a roller cam worth the extra cash and what size still want it streetable
-
Advertising
- Google Adsense
- REGISTERED USERS DO NOT SEE THIS AD
-
06-02-2007 05:05 PM #2
Roller cam hands down ,just on the fact it will not fail in the first 20 mins,like a flat tappet cam on break in.Theres no break in on a roller cam to possibly destroy the whle engine.
Anything I ever build is going to have a roller cam from now on,I got lucky on my flat tappet cam soo far,about 1hr + of run time.
Theres just too much worry on a flat tappet on break in.
You can knock about 50 bucks off the price of the roller cam,because you will not need the 50 dollars in special oil to break it in ,like a flat tappet.
2 bottles gm eos 20 bucks and then the oil and filter that gets replaced right away ,meaning you have to replace the oil and filter after break in,might be more than 50 dollars in oil and filters and additives for a flat tappet,plus none of that means theres no chance for it to fail.
I have seen roller cams where the spider broke and the roller was sideways on the cam and had eatin most of the roller away,it was almost square,all that was needed was a new lifter on that same cam ,because a few wear marks are irrelevant on a roller because the is virtually no friction .
Beyond the fact it will not fail on start up,it will produce more power and idle better than a flat tappet.
A flat tappet is taking the rest of the motor out with it when it goes,I have never heard of a roller cam failure ever.........they may fail I just have never heard of it.The roller in my 200000 mile 5.0 motor looked brand new when it was inspected......Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)
-
06-02-2007 05:30 PM #3
Roller. Not even a contest....Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
Carroll Shelby
Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!
-
06-02-2007 05:47 PM #4
What Dave said . . . No more flat tappet cams for me - ever.Jack
Gone to Texas
-
06-02-2007 06:11 PM #5
There not more expensive, if you ever have i failure with a flat tappet. "FLAT" tappet does that tell you anything
-
06-02-2007 08:43 PM #6
-
06-02-2007 08:50 PM #7
So there is no break in regiment with a roller cam? Very interesting, this Vortec is the first roller cam I've had, and was planning on doing the usual 2000 rpm break in ritual. Not needed, huh?
Don
-
06-02-2007 09:05 PM #8
Nope. No need to break in the cam.Jack
Gone to Texas
-
06-02-2007 09:14 PM #9
on soild roller we run over 300lbs at the seat just start them up on idle . well they idle around 1200 rpm check for leaks i brake in the valves springs and its ready
-
06-02-2007 09:16 PM #10
roller it is
what size roller should i get for the 408 compression is supposed to be around 10:1 i want it to be a street ride rarely ever going to see 6000 rpm hopefully never
-
06-02-2007 09:18 PM #11
i would look at a cam with a lsa of 107 or less
-
06-05-2007 12:41 AM #12
Originally Posted by maineevent
-
06-05-2007 09:22 AM #13
For driving on the street, think HYDRAULIC roller, not SOLID roller.Jack
Gone to Texas
Merry Christmas ya'll
Merry Christmas