Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: What's with my compression test???
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    billlsbird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3 Window Coupe w/ 392 Hemi
    Posts
    916

    What's with my compression test???

     



    ....Hi All, I pulled all my spark plugs, pulled the coil wire & wired the carb wide open. Although I DIDN'T warn the engine up to operating temperature. My compression readings were as follows; 185, 190, 210, 180, 190, 182, 180, & 180.... I cranked the engine over 7 times for each plug. On the one that measured 210 I re-did it & got 190 by just cranking it 5 times..... So what's up with the 210??? Why this high??? And isn't 180 to 190 high on my others??? I have a 413 small block Chev, 10 to 1 compression, AFR 195 street heads with 74 cc chambers, cam is 230/236 @ .050. w/ .512 lift {don't know if you need all this}..... Oh, even though I didn't warm the engine up to operating temperatures the directions said if you have aluminum heads to let the car cool for 10 minutes before pulling plugs. Why is this??? Thanks, Bill

  2. #2
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    Don't know why the variation in pressures, or why that one is so high. The warning about pulling plugs is because a hot aluminum head expands, grabbing the plug hard enough to damage the threads if you attempt to remove them.

  3. #3
    SMOKSHO98926's Avatar
    SMOKSHO98926 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Car Year, Make, Model: 67 Camaro
    Posts
    13

    Could be excess fuel in that cylinder and on the second test it was starting to disipate. Have you tried testing it again?
    I ain't never had to much fun but I keep trying.

  4. #4
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Hey Bill, it's a chebbie!!!! Looks like you have one good cylinder!!!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  5. #5
    billlsbird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3 Window Coupe w/ 392 Hemi
    Posts
    916

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Severson
    Hey Bill, it's a chebbie!!!! Looks like you have one good cylinder!!!!!!
    ....LOL, good one Dave!

    ....No, haven't tried it again but I will later today.... ok, it damages the head if you try to take a plug out when the engine is hot. That makes sense.... THANKS Bill

  6. #6
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Hey Denny, I thought them chebbie cams were made that way!!!! You mean they're all supposed to be the same size?????
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  7. #7
    billlsbird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3 Window Coupe w/ 392 Hemi
    Posts
    916

    ....THANKS! .... well I am considering going to a roller cam so this makes it easier!!! {should have used on to start with .... Ok, it's within 10% so that's ok...... As soon as I get my carb issues worked out I'm going to have my car dyno'ed on a rear wheel dyno. This will give me an idea {& a base line} of how my motor is running..... Bill

  8. #8
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    I really like using the chassis dyno. A friend of mine has one in his shop and he is a very sharp operator and print out analyzer... By far the best tune up tool I've ever used. We usually rent it for a couple hours, run a base line, make our changes, run again and see if we are going the right way. Beats the heck out of going to the track and guessing wrong and missing your dial in by a tenth!!! We've even hung out there all day, made runs with different ambient temperatures to note how the weather effects our tune up. The data is all there and once you understand the information getting the most improvement for the money becomes easy... Hate to ever be without access to one again, even given some thought to going partners with a guy and buying our own. Market isn't bad on some of the used ones.....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  9. #9
    383 chev's Avatar
    383 chev is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    MI
    Car Year, Make, Model: 93 tbird sc, daily atm
    Posts
    299

    when u get that dyno done. get a vid and post it on street fire and put up the link

  10. #10
    billlsbird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3 Window Coupe w/ 392 Hemi
    Posts
    916

    .....Dave, the local chassis dyno doesn't tune your car, they just run it 3 times on the dyno for $150. I know it put out 497 TQ & 460 HP on a flywheel dyno but I don't think it's running right now. So I was thinking if it put out 390 or so HP & 425 or so TQ on the chassis dyno then that's pretty much as good as it's going to get.....

    383Chev, If I can get my scanner working I will. Is that www.streetfire.net that your talking about???? Bill

  11. #11
    383 chev's Avatar
    383 chev is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    MI
    Car Year, Make, Model: 93 tbird sc, daily atm
    Posts
    299

    this is correct

  12. #12
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Quote Originally Posted by billlsbird
    .....Dave, the local chassis dyno doesn't tune your car, they just run it 3 times on the dyno for $150. I know it put out 497 TQ & 460 HP on a flywheel dyno but I don't think it's running right now. So I was thinking if it put out 390 or so HP & 425 or so TQ on the chassis dyno then that's pretty much as good as it's going to get.....
    Bill

    I doubt it will be that high. Horsepower loss through the drivetrain is typically around 20% with an automatic trans....

    Most dyno operators don't do any tuning, Andy is a friend and just pitches in cuz he's a nice guy!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  13. #13
    billlsbird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3 Window Coupe w/ 392 Hemi
    Posts
    916

    .... Dave, 20% loss? Then I'd want to see TQ in the 390 ish range & HP in the 360 ish range.... But then now that I think about it the engine was dyno'ed without the altenator & a/c set up on so would it be even more than a 20% loss? My flywheel HP/TQ of 460/499 was GROSS not net! No wonder my car doesn't seem that fast! THANKS a bunch! Bill

  14. #14
    billlsbird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3 Window Coupe w/ 392 Hemi
    Posts
    916

    ....VERY interesting Denny! Thank you! ;0 Bill

  15. #15
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    Some are not that high on parasitic loss. The transmission eats up a lot of it, automatics are worse then manuals, and so does the ring and pinion. The horsepower used to spin all the components before the rear wheels is not measured at the rear wheels. This is also one of the reasons I prefer a chassis dyno, more accurate real world numbers of the power that is actually making it to the ground where it counts!!!!
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink