Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: A solid roller in a '70 400 small block???
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 37
  1. #16
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidedraft Deuce
    Then He should run a Mechnical and save $400.00
    No,I would like to see him run a hyd. roller cam.

  2. #17
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    The mechanical is for high rpms...........................
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

  3. #18
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by shawnlee28
    The mechanical is for high rpms...........................
    Yes,I know.
    He has already said he does not want a 7,000 rpm engine.

  4. #19
    billlsbird is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Pahrump
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Ford 3 Window Coupe w/ 392 Hemi
    Posts
    916

    .....although my engine was blueprinted & balanced & built by a professional, it is built with cast parts; stock cast crank, stock 5.56 stock rods {but all ARP bolts, studs & forged pistons}. This is why I don't want to spin it to high. I think it would blow up with cast parts, wouldn't it? Plus it's a street car & I feel a 3000 true stall {3000 RPM is where it quits gaining RPM's when I punch it with the Trans Brake on} is already pushing the edge of 'street-able' for cruising around. 30" tall rear tires, 4:11 rear end with a Turbo 400 Trans & I'm at around 3000 RPM @ 65 MPH....
    The only reason I want to go with a Solid roller is I heard they sound better than Hydraulics!!! {you know, the sound 'bling' thing ... Is this true??? If not, I'll go with the Hyd. roller.... THANKS Bill

  5. #20
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by billlsbird
    .....although my engine was blueprinted & balanced & built by a professional, it is built with cast parts; stock cast crank, stock 5.56 stock rods {but all ARP bolts, studs & forged pistons}. This is why I don't want to spin it to high. I think it would blow up with cast parts, wouldn't it? Plus it's a street car & I feel a 3000 true stall {3000 RPM is where it quits gaining RPM's when I punch it with the Trans Brake on} is already pushing the edge of 'street-able' for cruising around. 30" tall rear tires, 4:11 rear end with a Turbo 400 Trans & I'm at around 3000 RPM @ 65 MPH....
    The only reason I want to go with a Solid roller is I heard they sound better than Hydraulics!!! {you know, the sound 'bling' thing ... Is this true??? If not, I'll go with the Hyd. roller.... THANKS Bill
    The mech. roller is less money than the hyd. roller cam.
    I would run a cam that lets you run a steel gear rather than the bronze gear.
    I have customers that get 10,000 miles out of the bronze gear and some will only get 3,000 miles before it becomes razor sharp and puts all the metal down in the pan.

  6. #21
    Sidedraft Deuce's Avatar
    Sidedraft Deuce is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    MotorCity
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Ford Hi Boy
    Posts
    22

    I have a Solid Street Roller they don't require a bronze gear and have a wider lobe separation than a drag racing grind. The wide lobe separation lowers the Rev rage and makes a lot of low end torque. The cast gear for the distributor is pressed on the billet cam. The cam I have In my 415 makes 14Inches of vacuum and Idles at 800 rpm.

    To your original post : the reason I said to run more duration than you have currently is that will bleed off some low speed cylinder pressure witch will help with your detonation problem.
    Yes they sound a lot better than a Hyd.
    Yes they cost less.
    Yes they make more power.
    No you don't have to spin the motor past 6000 RPM that's why its called a street roller.

  7. #22
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidedraft Deuce
    I have a Solid Street Roller they don't require a bronze gear and have a wider lobe separation than a drag racing grind. The wide lobe separation lowers the Rev rage and makes a lot of low end torque. The cast gear for the distributor is pressed on the billet cam. The cam I have In my 415 makes 14Inches of vacuum and Idles at 800 rpm.

    To your original post : the reason I said to run more duration than you have currently is that will bleed off some low speed cylinder pressure witch will help with your detonation problem.
    Yes they sound a lot better than a Hyd.
    Yes they cost less.
    Yes they make more power.
    No you don't have to spin the motor past 6000 RPM that's why its called a street roller.
    The wider L/S will actually make more cylinder pressure causing more of a chance of detonation.
    Not all street rollers are made from a billet some are made from cast iron.

  8. #23
    nitrowarrior's Avatar
    nitrowarrior is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Mesa
    Posts
    1,385

    GM supplies the "Melonized" gear for around 43 bucks. It works on steel and cast cams. Have three Steel roller cam engines running for over three years with this gear in them and no failures or strange behaviors from them.
    What if the "Hokey Pokey" is what it's really all about?

  9. #24
    Sidedraft Deuce's Avatar
    Sidedraft Deuce is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    MotorCity
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Ford Hi Boy
    Posts
    22

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    The wider L/S will actually make more cylinder pressure causing more of a chance of detonation.
    Not all street rollers are made from a billet some are made from cast iron.


    The cam that I suggested will not make more low speed cylinder pressure than the cam he has now. Your nit picking what I am saying and just confusing the facts. I am just trying to help him make the right decision and your trying to prove that you know more than I. Later
    Last edited by Sidedraft Deuce; 08-07-2007 at 10:31 PM.

  10. #25
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidedraft Deuce
    The cam that I suggested will not make more low speed cylinder pressure than the cam he has now. Your nit picking what I am saying and just confusing the facts. I am just trying to help him make the right decision and your trying to prove that you know more than I. Later
    Hey,Bud I do this for a living.
    Why don't you stop making posts when you are cluless about certain things.
    Anyone that builds engines knows that a wide L/S cam will build more cylinder pressure.
    Why not sit back and learn a thing or two.

  11. #26
    pat mccarthy's Avatar
    pat mccarthy is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    bay city
    Posts
    10,546

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    Hey,Bud I do this for a living.
    Why don't you stop making posts when you are cluless about certain things.
    Anyone that builds engines knows that a wide L/S cam will build more cylinder pressure.
    Why not sit back and learn a thing or two.
    Irish Diplomacy ..the ability to tell someone to go to Hell ,,So that they will look forward to to the trip

  12. #27
    Sidedraft Deuce's Avatar
    Sidedraft Deuce is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    MotorCity
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Ford Hi Boy
    Posts
    22

    Quote Originally Posted by erik erikson
    Hey,Bud I do this for a living.
    Why don't you stop making posts when you are cluless about certain things.
    Anyone that builds engines knows that a wide L/S cam will build more cylinder pressure.
    Why not sit back and learn a thing or two.


    Well you must be starving because you can't even read.

    The cam he has now is: "Cam now is 230/236 @ .050 duration, .522 lift {w/ 1.6 rockers}"

    The cam I recommended: "With 10:1 Compression and pump gas you will want a cam with at least 250* at .050 "

    Now tell me who is the "clueless"(can't even spell) one.

    Even the rookie bench/keyboard racers like you should know this one.
    Last edited by Sidedraft Deuce; 08-09-2007 at 12:02 AM.

  13. #28
    skids72's Avatar
    skids72 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Lafayette
    Car Year, Make, Model: 68 Firebird 439 BBC
    Posts
    745

    Where's my popcorn?


  14. #29
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidedraft Deuce
    Well you must be starving because you can't even read.

    The cam he has now is: "Cam now is 230/236 @ .050 duration, .522 lift {w/ 1.6 rockers}"

    The cam I recommended: "With 10:1 Compression and pump gas you will want a cam with at least 250* at .050 "

    Now tell me who is the "clueless"(can't even spell) one.

    Even the rookie bench/keyboard racers like you should know this one.
    My engine did not have to have a cam of that duration........................nor did I have to resort to derogitory school room name callin to get the right cam for it either..............
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

  15. #30
    Sidedraft Deuce's Avatar
    Sidedraft Deuce is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    MotorCity
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32 Ford Hi Boy
    Posts
    22

    Quote Originally Posted by shawnlee28
    My engine did not have to have a cam of that duration........................nor did I have to resort to derogitory school room name callin to get the right cam for it either..............

    I thought the same thing when he called me clueless!!
    You can fool some of the people some of the time.

    But you can't fool all of the people all of the time.

Reply To Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink