Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Air gap manifold question
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    Hotrod46's Avatar
    Hotrod46 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Vidalia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1946 Ford Coupe, 1962 Austin Healey 3000
    Posts
    1,500

    Air gap manifold question

     



    Has anyone had driveability problems with an air gap manifold?

    I'm thinking about running dual quads on my T and the manifold is available in both air gap and non air gap. I've never run an air gap.

    I know that the air gap manifold helps build horsepower by allowing the A/F mixture to stay cooler(and denser). All the dyno data I've looked at bears this out, but dyno pulls don't always tell the whole story.

    My question is about low speed driveability. Most of the stock engines I've seen that had manifolds raised above the block had some means of heating the runners(water or exhaust). I know that engines I've had with blocked off heat risers were very cold natured.

  2. #2
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by Hotrod46
    Has anyone had driveability problems with an air gap manifold?

    I'm thinking about running dual quads on my T and the manifold is available in both air gap and non air gap. I've never run an air gap.

    I know that the air gap manifold helps build horsepower by allowing the A/F mixture to stay cooler(and denser). All the dyno data I've looked at bears this out, but dyno pulls don't always tell the whole story.

    My question is about low speed driveability. Most of the stock engines I've seen that had manifolds raised above the block had some means of heating the runners(water or exhaust). I know that engines I've had with blocked off heat risers were very cold natured.
    With dual carbs. the manifold will be the least of your worries.

  3. #3
    Hotrod46's Avatar
    Hotrod46 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Vidalia
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1946 Ford Coupe, 1962 Austin Healey 3000
    Posts
    1,500

    Eric

    Yeah, I know they're not the easiest things to sort out, but I'm hoping I can tune them where they will run.

    Sometimes I'm too stuborn for my own good, though!

    Mike

  4. #4
    speedy55779's Avatar
    speedy55779 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    saginaw
    Car Year, Make, Model: 41 plymouth, 48 dodge truck
    Posts
    195

    go with the smallest cfm 4bbl carbs you can get. maybe holley 300cfm or 350cfm? they were made for puttin a 4bbl on inline 6's. this guy i knew had 2 450cfm holleys with a weind duel tunnel ram an a points ignition with a stock coil its always ran rich an like crap an on top of it the dummy had a monster circle track cam in it with a 3000 - 7000 rpm range. but i had ran a victor jr with a single 600cfm edelbrock carb on a stock motor an it worked great no heat problems ran a 160 t-stat also
    Derek Doble

  5. #5
    BigTruckDriver is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    TX
    Car Year, Make, Model: hotrod
    Posts
    1,830

    Quote Originally Posted by speedy55779
    go with the smallest cfm 4bbl carbs you can get. maybe holley 300cfm or 350cfm? they were made for puttin a 4bbl on inline 6's. this guy i knew had 2 450cfm holleys with a weind duel tunnel ram an a points ignition with a stock coil its always ran rich an like crap an on top of it the dummy had a monster circle track cam in it with a 3000 - 7000 rpm range. but i had ran a victor jr with a single 600cfm edelbrock carb on a stock motor an it worked great no heat problems ran a 160 t-stat also
    Things could run a little different, he lives in LA. and you live in MN.
    Friends dont let friends drive fords!

  6. #6
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    Go with the non air gap..........
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

  7. #7
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    Before the Air Gap intakes were around . We would just block off the heat ports . And run a Lifter valley tray . By do so the intake would stay much cooler . But when driving the car on below 50deg days . It would be like a car with no choke . And after say 50 min of driving with the under hood temp higher . Then the car was more drivable . The Air Gap will do the same thing in below 50deg days . If you take out your rod on the more warmer days then it will work great . Because on the hot days with are old set up . Or with the new Air Gap . Your manifold will be at a much cooler temp . The chance of Vapor Locking is next to none . Or you can run the non-Air Gap intake with the heat ports open . And just the valley tray that keeps the hot oil off the bottom of the intake . I do it this way on a car that is more street then strip .
    Attached Images

  8. #8
    selmorides's Avatar
    selmorides is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    La Salle
    Car Year, Make, Model: 65 Pontiac Tempest Custom 2 door hardtop
    Posts
    32

    Run the air gap. Run Holley 600's; 1850 vacuum secondaries. You should be able to get them cheap on eBay if you know how to rebuild them with a Holley, repeat HOLLEY kit. Run the vacuum balance kit on the vacuum secondaries. Don't forget the power valves, especially if you run an automatic. Holley 'tuners' change jets all the time but ignore the power valve. Use a vacuum guage for tuning if you don't know already. Have fun with those quads. It takes alot of nerve to run them.

  9. #9
    gassersgarage is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Torrance
    Car Year, Make, Model: 31 Ford Model A
    Posts
    84

    If your running a small block, they usually just run off of the rear carb till half throttle. Big block, on the other hand, need to run one to one linkage, otherwise the front cylinders run hot. Edelbrock uses 500 carbs for small blocks and 600 carbs for big blocks.

    I run 600 carbs on my 454 with one to one linkage.

  10. #10
    erik erikson's Avatar
    erik erikson is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    clive
    Car Year, Make, Model: BLOWN 540 57 CHEVY
    Posts
    2,878

    Quote Originally Posted by gassersgarage
    If your running a small block, they usually just run off of the rear carb till half throttle. Big block, on the other hand, need to run one to one linkage, otherwise the front cylinders run hot. Edelbrock uses 500 carbs for small blocks and 600 carbs for big blocks.

    I run 600 carbs on my 454 with one to one linkage.
    I don't think he needs a 1,000 cfm for a 5,000 rpm engine.

  11. #11
    IC2
    IC2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UPSTATE New York
    Posts
    4,336

    A street driven car needs heat and small carbs. Two 600 cfm carbs even with a progressive type linkage is way too much. A single 500 CFM on a 350 is just about right for 90% of driving, with a 600 as a nice choice when you want to kick it in the butt:

    Size = (Engine CI x RPM) /3456 X Volumetric efficiancy

    = (350 x 6000) / 3456 x .85

    = 516 CFM TOTAL !!!!

    Most engines without major mods wont have a VE (Volumetric Efficiency) much greater then 85 - 90%. Seldom will you be running at 6000 RPM. Choose your carbs accordingly - but a FI setup would be a better choice.
    Dave W
    I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug

  12. #12
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942


    He definatly does not need 1200 cfm either........

    I know I will get flac over this suggestion ,but its a good one ,just not as impressive.......I would use the adapters and run 2 big 2 barrels on that manifold ,under the aircleaner they will be mostly hidden anyway.A couple of 350 cfm 2 barrels or in that range ,maybe a pair of 300s.........Then use non progressive linkage,both open and close at the same time.
    Some thing like this......Holley 0-807871 High Performance Race 350 CFM 2-Barrel Carburetor.
    Amazon.com: Holley 0-807871 High Performance Race 350 CFM 2-Barrel Carburetor: Automotive
    Last edited by shawnlee28; 02-19-2008 at 11:18 AM.
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

  13. #13
    IC2
    IC2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UPSTATE New York
    Posts
    4,336

    This is a list from the Holley web site:

    Holley Performance Street Performance – Traditional Products

    Look at p/n 0-8007. It's a 390 CFM !!!!
    * Vacuum Secondaries
    * Power Valve Blow-out Protection
    * 100% Wet-Flow Tested
    * Model 4160 W/Side Hung Floats
    * Calibrated for Small V8 or 6-cyl Engines
    * 2x4 Street Tunnel Ram Carb
    * Ford A/T Kickdown
    * Electric Choke
    * Includes Single Inlet Banjo Fitting
    Dave W
    I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug

  14. #14
    shawnlee28's Avatar
    shawnlee28 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    so.cal
    Car Year, Make, Model: 66 c 10 fleetside longbed
    Posts
    1,942

    WOW,I never knew you could get a 4 barrel that small......
    You could run those non progressive too!!!!!!!!
    I think those are perfect for your engine...........
    With the non tunnel ram intake and those carbs ,it should be a walk in the park.....
    Its gunna take longer than u thought and its gunna cost more too(plan ahead!)

  15. #15
    IC2
    IC2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    UPSTATE New York
    Posts
    4,336

    Quote Originally Posted by shawnlee28
    WOW,I never knew you could get a 4 barrel that small......
    You could run those non progressive too!!!!!!!!
    I think those are perfect for your engine...........
    With the non tunnel ram intake and those carbs ,it should be a walk in the park.....


    At $347 EACH from Summit .

    Oh well it's only money. I used to run 750CFM 3310's and they are $270 ea and the good ol' 600 cfm 0-1850s are $250 ea
    Dave W
    I am now gone from this forum for now - finally have pulled the plug

Reply To Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink