Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: 305 - (again)
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Charlyg is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Fallbrook
    Car Year, Make, Model: 46" Ford 2dr Sedan
    Posts
    146

    305 - (again)

     



    Sorry guys - hate to beat this to death but is there ANYTHING good about the 85' 305 TPI engine? No way to make it into at least a decent cruiser? It's going into a 46' Ford 2 dr. If not than should I go with a crate motor or go the YARD route and build one. Doing the work is no problem. Many thanks.

  2. #2
    Charlyg is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Fallbrook
    Car Year, Make, Model: 46" Ford 2dr Sedan
    Posts
    146

    Just trying to find the most economical way to go -

  3. #3
    Bob Parmenter's Avatar
    Bob Parmenter is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Salado
    Car Year, Make, Model: 32, 40 Fords,
    Posts
    10,876

    Charly, 305's don't lift anyone's skirt, but independent of people with a negative outlook on the world, and judged on their own they were "functional". The TPI system functioned well, and has been used in millions of cars. If you're not going for outright performance, and don't intend to drive the car any more aggressively than the Camaros, Firebirds, and whatever else these engines came in you shouldn't be too disappointed. After all, your car weighs less than either of those mentioned above.

    The negative comes in the image department. Nearly everyone who sees a Chev small block is conditioned to think 350, and of course there MUST be something wrong with an engine that's smaller. This is the good old US of A and more is better. Rodding mentality just multiplies that line of reasoning. So, you lose points by having a smaller engine, and some day when you go to sell it the marketplace will "punish" you by not valuing the car as highly for not having the larger engine.

    If some time in the future you wanted to boost power, the built in limitations that you've (hopefully) read about in other threads archived here will come to roost. If the engine will require rebuilding now or in the not too distant future, then getting a fresh 350 (or larger if you want) would be a better way to go.
    Your Uncle Bob, Senior Geezer Curmudgeon

    It's much easier to promise someone a "free" ride on the wagon than to urge them to pull it.

    Luck occurs when preparation and opportunity converge.

  4. #4
    Charlyg is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Fallbrook
    Car Year, Make, Model: 46" Ford 2dr Sedan
    Posts
    146

    thanks Uncle Bob - appreciate your knowledge!

  5. #5
    Matt167's Avatar
    Matt167 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Prattsville
    Car Year, Make, Model: '51 Chevy Fleetline and a Ratrod project
    Posts
    4,990

    I would say get a 350 and fit it with dual quad intake running 650 cfm carbs or get a tri power intake with rodchester 2gc carbs.
    You don't know what you've got til it's gone

    Matt's 1951 Chevy Fleetline- Driver

    1967 Ford Falcon- Sold

    1930's styled hand built ratrod project

    1974 Volkswagen Super Beetle Wolfsburg Edition- sold

  6. #6
    Charlyg is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Fallbrook
    Car Year, Make, Model: 46" Ford 2dr Sedan
    Posts
    146

    Thanks Matt - maybe I will

  7. #7
    fordnutz is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    MooseJaw
    Car Year, Make, Model: 49 chev P/U, 46 ford convert project.
    Posts
    41

    Charley, if you want gas mileage and ok performance use the 305 and a 700-R auto. If you want tire blistering action use a 350. I am tired of paying for fuel as I use my cars for long haul cruizin. I'm using a junkyard low mile (60,000) 305-700R unit in my 57 Pontiac sedan delivery. I will use the money I save on a used 305 engine/tranny and fuel savings on air conditioning. 305=Cheap and economical. My 28 A on the other hand has a 327 and tri-power. No hood or fenders so has to be a looker. Fordnutz.
    website: http://groups.msn.com/goldenoldiesvintagetin
    Last edited by fordnutz; 01-18-2004 at 11:17 PM.
    website http://groups.msn.com/goldenoldiesvintagetin

  8. #8
    awsum34's Avatar
    awsum34 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Overland Park
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1935 Chevy standard
    Posts
    97

    I put a 305 TPI in my S10 Blazer. Didn't have any problems. If i had to do it again and had the 305 laying around. I'd put it in again. When people hear 305 i guess the compare it to a 6 banger.
    If you already have the 305 and your going to just cruise, then go with it. You can always go 350 TPI later
    The only dumb question is the one you don't ask..

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink