Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: MS or VS carb for me?
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    staleg's Avatar
    staleg is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford Roadster High Boy
    Posts
    154

    MS or VS carb for me?

     



    I have a CSB 350 stock, one piece rear main seal, Air gap square bore intake, headers, T56 manual trans, Car is a '34 Roadster, Jaguar rear 3,54:1. Tires are 295/50-16.

    Planned upgrades for the engine will be Vortec heads modified for higher lift and a new cam of course.

    Would like to have a carb that can be used both on the near stock engine of today and later when it is modified.

    I've heard that mechanical secondary carburetors are recommended when the car is not too heavy and has a manual trans. Why is that?

  2. #2
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    I think your set up 350 T5 3.54 rear Light street rod . You could go with a 700 CFM Holley D/P . If you wanted to run the car at the track alot . But for a good street Holley carb I would run the 670 CFM V/S Avenger . But my first carburetor pick would be . The Edelbrock Thunder series AVS 650 CFM adj V/S carb . I have always had good Luck with the Carter AFB-AVS Remake carburetors . I do think what ever Brand you go with the V/S under 750 CFM is the way to go .

  3. #3
    staleg's Avatar
    staleg is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford Roadster High Boy
    Posts
    154

    Thanks.
    But why do most recommend mechanical secondary carb for engines with manual transmissions?

  4. #4
    Dave Severson is offline CHR Member/Contributor Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Madison
    Car Year, Make, Model: '67 Ranchero, '57 Chevy, '82 Camaro,
    Posts
    21,160

    I use mechanical secondaries with a 4 speed light car cuz I like the secondaries to come on when I want them and don't want to have to wait for the vacuum signal to open them.... Just the old circle burner/throttle control stuff coming out in me, I guess..

    Carb selection would also depend on your driving style, I like going fast and good handling. Both seem to be easier to achieve with the manual trans/mechanical secondary combination.... If your just going cruisin' and travelling, the vacuum secondary will do just fine....
    Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, Live for Today!
    Carroll Shelby

    Learning must be difficult for those who already know it all!!!!

  5. #5
    tango's Avatar
    tango is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,354

    Quote Originally Posted by staleg
    Thanks.
    But why do most recommend mechanical secondary carb for engines with manual transmissions?
    It's not your manual trans . It's the 355 gear and the street driving . You will have a smoother throttle response . And better MPG with the V/S carb . But yes for all out racing the D/P will be better .

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink