Welcome to Club Hot Rod!  The premier site for everything to do with Hot Rod, Customs, Low Riders, Rat Rods, and more. 

  •  » Members from all over the US and the world!
  •  » Help from all over the world for your questions
  •  » Build logs for you and all members
  •  » Blogs
  •  » Image Gallery
  •  » Many thousands of members and hundreds of thousands of posts! 

YES! I want to register an account for free right now!  p.s.: For registered members this ad will NOT show

 

Thread: Trying for better milage
          
   
   

Reply To Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Langan's Avatar
    Langan is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Sequim
    Car Year, Make, Model: 34 Ford pickup, 65 Ranchero,35 ford
    Posts
    39

    Come on someone has had to have tried this..........Jim

  2. #2
    JeffB2's Avatar
    JeffB2 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Phoenix
    Car Year, Make, Model: 1954 Ford Customline 5.0 & AOD
    Posts
    443

    Another way to go

     



    Quote Originally Posted by Langan
    Come on someone has had to have tried this..........Jim
    You will probably be OK with the 500,back in the Jimmy Carter "gas crisis" days Holley came out with the 450 CFM Economaster.This was a spreadbore replacement for the Quadrajet,the key is to run either carb with an intake with smaller runners for more velocity like the Edelbrock SP2P or the Streetmaster or Offenhauser Dual-Port,with the right matching Cam 22-25 MPG was attainable.

  3. #3
    techinspector1's Avatar
    techinspector1 is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Zephyrhills, Florida, USA
    Car Year, Make, Model: '32 Henway
    Posts
    12,423

    I think it's gonna be tough to beat a Quadrajet for mileage. In my opinion, the tiny little primaries are the best it's gonna get and the huge secondaries will provide all the CFM you can handle with a street motor. Most 2-bbl throttle bores are larger than the primaries on mid-sized 4-bbl carbs. I've been gathering all the info I can find on Quadrajets and will share it with you.....

    Click on the links posted in this thread for additional info....
    http://www.montecarloss.com/communit...547#Post572547

    http://www.florida4x4.com/tech/quadrajet/index.php

    http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache...lnk&cd=2&gl=us

    http://www.highperformancepontiac.co...cuum_hose.html

    http://www.geocities.com/gtopercy/Pi...rajetTech.html

    http://www.buickpartsdirectory.com/carbs.htm

    http://www.73-87.com/7387garage/drivetrain/myqjet.htm

    http://www.highperformancepontiac.co...ing/index.html

    http://www.mako.com.au/buick/html/qjet_tips.htm
    Last edited by techinspector1; 06-04-2008 at 01:13 AM.
    PLANET EARTH, INSANE ASYLUM FOR THE UNIVERSE.

  4. #4
    R Pope is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Eston
    Posts
    2,270

    If your carb is dialed in right, it doesn't make much difference what the CFM rating is. That's at wide open, and you aren't cruising at WOT. For the around-town stop and go driving you do, a smaller carb might be more driveable just because you won't have to deliberately "feather"the throttle at every start to avoid dumping a bucketfull of expensive fun juice down the tubes. For highway use in the real world, I get much better economy with a well set up AFB than even a two barrel, Ford, Chev, Dodge, all have AFB's, all work better than the stock ones did.
    i have a 318 pickup with an ancient SP-2P intake, and it does make a noticeable difference to mileage by keeping the velocity up, but the power just isn't there.

  5. #5
    65ny's Avatar
    65ny is offline CHR Member Visit my Photo Gallery
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Mustang
    Car Year, Make, Model: '65 New Yorker, '67 Newport
    Posts
    271

    I recently removed the 2bbl from my son's car and replaced it with a rebuilt edelbrock 1406. (Chevy 350/350) I also tuned and tweaked my timing. The MPG improved dramatically. I can get 21+ mpg on the highway now in a big heavy mid '70's Monte Carlo. With your tranny, gears, and tall tires, you will probably be able to get considerably better than that. I am inclined to believe that my timing adjustments did more for my gas mileage than the carb swap. Dig around on this forum for the "HEI Recurve" post. Some here said B.S. to my results, but that happens from time to time.

    BTW: I totally agree with Tech on the Quadrajet, I used the edelbrock because the intake I had was a square bore. A QJ would have been my first choice.
    Last edited by 65ny; 06-04-2008 at 06:47 AM.

Reply To Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Links monetized by VigLink